GAL Immunity Scam
For the more constitutionally inclined blog aficionados, here is the explanation on why the concept of immunity for the Connecticut guardian ad litem in a divorce proceeding is unconstitutional. Only the jews will twist application of jewdicial policy with legalistic argle bargle to produce the zionist decision of Carrubba v Moskowitz, which erroneously created immunity where none exists. Jews like Borden and Katz want the simple minded goy to believe that due process of divorce requires a GAL as a ‘judicial function integral to the process’, but like slippery jews, they do not identify the ‘function’ of law which the GAL performs. The jewdiciary feigns a claim that the GAL… Read More »GAL Immunity Scam