Stories and commentary about the most evil court in the country. A system designed to inflict pain and suffering while enriching players, lawyers, vendors and judges with family savings. Protecting the paedophile monsters of society and trafficking their toys being the primary function.
As Justice Brennan says:
Speech concerning public affairs is more than self-expression; it is the essence of self- government. The First and Fourteenth Amendments embody our “profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 74 (1964).
As Justice Clark of SCOTUS writes:
The principle that justice cannot survive behind walls of silence has long been reflected in the “Anglo-American distrust for secret trials.” A responsible press has always been regarded as the handmaiden of effective judicial administration, especially in the criminal field. Its function in this regard is documented by an impressive record of service over several centuries. The press does not simply publish information about trials but guards against the miscarriage of justice by subjecting the police, prosecutors, and judicial processes to extensive public scrutiny and criticism. This Court has, therefore, been unwilling to place any direct limitations on the freedom traditionally exercised by the news media for “what transpires in the courtroom is public property.” The “unqualified prohibitions laid down by the framers were intended to give to liberty of the press . . . the broadest scope that could be countenanced in an orderly society.” …we have consistently required that the press have a free hand, even though we sometimes deplored its sensationalism. Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 US 333; 350 (1966)
Since when have we Americans been expected to bow submissively to authority and speak with awe and reverence to those who represent us? Justice W.O. Douglas
You want some speech?
A function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purposes when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger. Speech is often provocative and challenging. It may strike at prejudices and preconceptions and have profound unsettling effects as it presses for acceptance of an idea. Justice W.O. Douglas Terminiello v. Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949).
Fuck Family Court DISCRETION
Absolute discretion is a ruthless master. It is more destructive of freedom than any of man’s other inventions. Justice W.O. Douglas United States v. Wunderlich, 342 U.S. 98, 101 (1951).
Kiss my fucking ass…..
Free speech is not to be regulated like diseased cattle and impure butter. The audience … that hissed yesterday may applaud today, even for the same performance. Justice W. O. Douglas, Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436, 447 (1957).
Fuck Family Court’s Jewish Agenda
In MATAL v. TAM a.k.a Slants:
The Government has an interest in preventing speech expressing ideas that offend. And, as we have explained, that idea strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.” United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U. S. 644, 655 (1929).