The now-famous worst blog calls out Ed Mahoney of the nation’s oldest continuously published newspaper for being a hapless shill to the jewdicial mafia of Connecticut, spinning a judicial corruption story into a heinous anti-semtic drama to shame the goy. Oi vey, only executive editor Helen Bennett could be proud of such journalistic hypocrisy, fictional writing played on the goy as ‘reporting’. Blog elders frown upon a newspaper dating to 1764 which today advocates censorship by ridiculing citizens for exercising First Amendment rights. Ed Mahoney plays the jew game of ‘hate speech’ being speech the jews hate. Poor Ed, a demented old man, detached from reality, promoting trickery on his fellow citizen, undermining the Constitution at the direction of his jewish masters, rewarded with shekels to feed himself. Newsflash: Criticism of jew whores in the Connecticut Jewdiciary is a First Amendment right of the goy.
Ed reports on the tyranny of Judge Thomas Moukawsher in the disbarment of a zealous advocate who states FACT that the family court is a cesspool of talmudic jewery played out on goy with money in disregard for due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment. Instead of stating the obvious, Moukawsher lacks statutory authority to summary disbar an advocate for disliked speech, Ed goes off into a large bowl of jewish word salad to twist reality into holocaustic anti-semitic furor. Ed reports that the Superior Court of Corrupticut disbarred a lawyer for free speech which Judge Moukawsher found to be ‘anti-semitic’. Well fuck the jews! Anti-semitic speech is free speech! Do these jews hold some chosen place in society that they are immune from criticism? Jews are so hated around the world that they have been formally expelled from over a hundred countries in the recent millennium. Emperors expelled them twice from ancient Rome before birth of the little kid in Bethlehem. Jews are just nasty, filthy, parasites, who control family court for personal profit, to detriment of parents and childhood. Poor Ed, can’t grasp reality, he thinks six million were gassed in showers with a mild insecticide. Gullible? Or just fucking stupid?
Ed colors a simple, administrative, no-fault divorce proceeding as ‘exceptionally bitter divorce and custody fight’, wanting the reader to believe ‘fights’ are part of divorce, when they are simply scams orchestrated by jews to generate huge legal fees for totally incompetent lawyers. The state has no interest, only jewish love of money, as every divorce is ninety minutes of work; mostly typing. He wants readers to believe that a sovereign people hold cause to make parents fight over kids, when it is a jewish construct created by jews to assault humanity, undermine Church teachings, destroy families, and feed family bar jews; kickbacks to jew judges who ignore due process protections of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Ed claims ‘bizarre judicial conspiracies’. What is bizarre about a gaggle of jews conspiring to scam the goy? Jews are hucksters, what jews have done for millennia, history proves the essence of the jew has no benefit to an enlightened society, why does Ed suggest otherwise?
Ed’s reporting lacks any specifics. Next he claims that the ‘court system’, whoever the fuck that is, and ‘law enforcement agencies’ have been attracted to the story. Nice allusion to something sinister, but court administrators like Bozzuto and Carroll cannot even ensure judges to come to work on time, hardly a concern, but ‘law enforcement’? Does Ed suggest there is criminal conduct at hand or is he just throwing a hot chili pepper in his word salad to deflect the reader’s attention away from jewish corruption in the simple administration of no-fault divorce? Like who in the state cares if you are married or not?
Ed spews more yellow journalism where he claims ‘unofficially’ court officials and cops are watching the case. Ed cites no reference for this statement of intrigue. How does he know what is official and unofficial in the cesspool of the jewdiciary? The chief nigger tells him what is going on in chambers? Because he has been told ‘unofficially’ what to write to malign the goy? Why are the cops concerned? Certainly not to protect rights of the goy. Ed outdoes himself in making lies where only jewish court corruption exists. Proving himself a domestic enemy of the Constitution, Ed attacks the evil internet and free citizens who may express themselves. Jews hate the internet, hate criticism, hate publicity of their jewness, where Ed is going to drive the point home under the masthead of the HARTFORD COURANT that the goy are bad!
Ed opines ‘pernicious screeds’ and conspiracies result from the jewish scam of family court, claiming divorce proceedings are becoming more bitter and costly! Poor Ed does no research for his pathetic prose, the same jewish scam has been the hallmark of Connecticut family court going back to the early eighties. All major court opinions in family law have been issued by jews. The Tauck case ran up a bill of over $10M in an 86 day trial back in 2007, orchestrated by jew Judge Holly Wetstone. It is all about jews and money, Simply Money. Poor folk never have long trials, private pay vendors, therapy, expert testimony, GALs, AMCs, evaluations, such luxury of protracted expensive litigation is the divorce due process reserved for the rich. Poor folks have no issues. More money a family has, the more COSTLY the due process of divorce … jewish law.
Ed rambles about public expression that family court needs to be burned to the ground, judges eliminated, children protected. Ed cites a Blog post having pictures of jew judges as vile, anti-semitic, but is nonetheless protected speech. Really hard to find meaning in Ed’s blither, does he not realize there are some people who would like to see family court burn along with the jew judges? Is it not the essence of self-governance to purge corruption from the government? Why does Ed use HC masthead to opine the will of a sovereign people be thwarted? Does Ed claim that a sovereign people cannot suggest violence against a gaggle of jews to protect children, uphold rule of law, and eliminate jewdicial discretion from due process? Is Ed a jew? Sounds like one, probably smells like one too.
Ed fails to properly report that in 2015, Judge Elizabeth Bozzuto, a public figure on a public stage, head of the family court, complains to the FBI that someone copied family photos from her public facebook page, IZZA ZUTTO, without her permission. FBI Special Agent Lisa Tutty of the New Haven Field Office pursued the public use of public photos, where Deidre Daly, US Attorney for D. Connecticut convened TWO grand juries, failing to obtain an indictment. The ham sandwich was not even a suspect! A jew’s idea of criminal conduct did not match the elements of law. Deidre and Elizabeth are dyke pals, along with Anastasia King . Bozzuto’s criminal complaint resulted in the FBI creating large binders of memes scoured from the internet, in the name of cyber stalking; merely free expression. The State Police even presented a binder of memes to the Speaker of the General Assembly. There was no crime, no probable cause, no indictment, just the jews of Connecticut abusing goy who speak ill of the cesspool of family court. Boo, hoo!!! Jews of Connecticut conspire with federal jews to hunt free speech across state lines; how un-American. Too bad Ed is promoting the jewish agenda rather than reporting facts. Any jew can twist free speech into cyber stalking to scare goy into silence, but Democracy Dies In Darkness.
Ed is so stupid that he quotes Moukawsher’s lie that the attorney was GUILTY of turning the case into an un-triable mess. Yet there is no jury, no guilty verdict, no complaint, no state prosecution, just a jew opinion from retard nut in a black robe executing orders from his jewish masters. The goy made the mess, the jews had nothing to do with it!!! The un-triable mess resulted in a no-fault divorce, a destroyed family, drained bank, and the wish of Judge Adelman to reunite the mother with the kids, who jew Judge Grossman previously tore apart based on psychological recommendation of pet jew, Dr. Jessica Caverly, an ‘expert’ kike opinion to malign the goy, designed to inflame conflict generating more shekels for jew pockets. It is all about money, the true god of the jew.
Ed quotes Moukawsher’s descriptor that calling out the jew family court for being jewish is ‘monstrous’. Pretty lame, as Moukawsher is better known for his love of the helicopter door gunner in ‘Full Metal Jacket’, mowing down rice paddy farmers in Vietnam. Perhaps family court needs a fly over? A .50 cal to all heads? Moukawsher has a life long mental retardation issue which is quite evident in the lack of focus in his so called written decisions. He is not judge material, which is why he is in family court, the dumping grounds for the incompetent and the infirm; a jewish playground.
The now-famous worst Blog is saddened that the Hartford Courant will name a pissant internet blog FRANKREPORT, but will not name this fine blog; discriminatory conduct of the Courant could not be more pronounced. Perhaps pathetic reporters just commiserate by association. In the end, Ed Mahoney doing the jew thing, smoke and mirrors, a putrid defense of the jew scam of family court, focusing on shooting the messenger, obscuring facts, ignoring required due process, sacrificing children for lawyer feed. Jewdicial corruption begs its own destruction, the more a judge like Moukawsher works to malign the critics, the greater the effort to eliminate him, his overlords, and propagandists like Ed, just a matter of time until karma catches up with the jewdiciary.
What is so fucking PUZZLING about the jews of family court? All the players in the Dulos case were jews: Donna Heller, Reuben Midler, Steven Herman … just a fact, jews will fuck up a family with money, same with the Ambrose case.
Editor’s Note: Assholes like Ed Mahoney will denounce a free citizen for owning too many guns, just because jews hate the Second Amendment. Oi vey, jewmerica, where rights go to die.
The puzzling story of disbarred Connecticut attorney Nickola Cunha
By Ed Mahoney Hartford Courant
Nickola Cunha, a divorce lawyer who was disbarred after making antisemitic allegations in court about state judges and then made the target of an arrest order, will have eluded authorities for two weeks as of this weekend.
Cunha was disbarred in January during an exceptionally bitter divorce and custody fight after trying to derail the case with claims of bizarre judicial conspiracies — racist conspiracy theories that have attracted the attention of both the court system and law enforcement agencies. She was disbarred after failing to produce any substantiation of her claims in spite of being given repeated opportunities to do so.
Unofficially, court officials and law enforcement are watching the case unfold, along with the postings of what amounts to a cadre of supporters on the internet. As contested divorces with prolonged custody battles drag on longer and become more bitter — often at ruinous cost — allegations of conspiracies and pernicious screeds about the state’s family court system are appearing online regularly.
Family court judges have been threatened, and photos of their spouses posted online. A Cromwell man was convicted of threatening one judge and urging followers in antisemitic internet postings to harm others.
A particularly vile and antisemitic internet posting last week featured photographs of several judges and a reference to violence posed as question.
The U.S. Attorney’s office empaneled a grand jury in 2016 to investigate whether a long string of postings about an administrative judge in the state family court system amounted to the federal crime of cyber stalking.
Judge Thomas Moukawsher disbarred Cunha on Jan. 25 for making sweeping antisemitic pronouncements and “empty and malicious” claims that certain judges are protecting criminals, are biased against the disabled and are making decisions in divorce cases that steer fees to favored lawyers and experts. By leveling her allegations in court and on the record in an effort to disqualify the judge assigned to her client’s case, Moukawsher said Cunha was guilty of “snarling the case into an un-triable mess.”
In a written decision, Moukawsher said it is “monstrous” to make a conspiracy claim such as Cunha’s “without thought, without evidence, without restraint, repeatedly, on the record, in court, with a specific claim about a list that proves not to exist.”
But on May 21, an internet site called Frank Report published what it reports to be a statement from Cunha in which she portrays herself as a victim of a corrupt judiciary.
