In the bizzarro family court of the jewish cesspool of Connecticut, the application of chosen prior restraint is pointedly unconstitutional, but played upon the goy as jewdicial discretion. Forget the Bill of Rights, forget the parchment known as the Constitution, this is Connecticut where jews rule, the four legged barnyard goy animals exist only for kosher slaughter, their kids too.
The nutmeg goy enter the mis-named ‘family court’ to obtain a simple no-fault’ divorce, an administrative action of the state government, hijacked by jews to drain family savings. The now famous blog cites a strange order issued by blog famous jew judge Jane Kupson Grossman, a retarded dyke in a black robe devoid of any intellect or understanding of court function in the rapidly collapsing Republic. Jane orders that the parties notify her chosen GAL prior to a parent contacting law enforcement or state agency regarding the children. Prior restraint? Jewish restraint? Denial of parental rights?
What is the narrow state interest achieved by restraining citizens from free expression? Put in more technical terms, Jane Grossman acts in deprivation of rights under the color of state law … see 18 USC 242, criminal conduct. Any surprise that our girl Jane is breaking federal law in her courtroom, where she claims ownership and power to do whatever she wants? Jane is just a deviant, demented, retarded jew, who thinks she can beat constitutional karma. Judicial immunity does not stop .308 freedom seeds, nor does it apply to a jewdical act, outside judicial function.
What is the purpose of Jane’s order of restraint to notify her pet GAL before reporting a crime against the children? Does this give pet jew GAL Jocelyn Hurwitz time to notify the pedo ring that mom discovers dad is groping the kids? Put the jew fix in to the thin blue pedo line to ignore the cries of children? Call her pedo pals at DCF to ‘screen out’ a report of sexual abuse? The GAL is a court appointee, what is the court trying to do by restraining free exercise of expression collared to the court’s own foot soldier? Jewish restraint? Pedo control? Judicial misconduct?
The pedo purpose of this jew order is sinister. The order strips the parents of rights and duty of protection of their own children, making them subject to jewish reporting requirements to a jew court appointee. The timing sequence tells all. Can’t call the police without notification to the GAL first? Why not call the GAL after the police report is made? Full, fair, and frank disclosure is already a requirement of litigants in family court, what is so special about the Ambrose case that jew Jane had to issue this curiously sinister order?
The answer is obvious. Jew Jane is trafficking Mia, Matthew, and Sawyer. Daddy Christopher Ambrose has pedo protection, where Judge Grossman and GAL Jocelyn Hurwitz are paid to deliver. Having mother or counsel get outsiders involved before Jocelyn can put her foot down, just makes trafficking more difficult. The jews of pedoland don’t even try to hide it anymore, just flagrant unconstitutional orders issued in family court, having nothing to do with dissolving a marriage is the tell tale sign of child trafficking.
Doubtful that Grossman can outrun Karma or Jocelyn can dodge a .50 cal to the head.