Skip to content

Tammy!

Blog famous TAMMY!, family court judge in Hartford, Connecticut proves once again that no law will restrict the assumed absolute discretion of a monster in a black robe. TAMMY! willfully violated the civil rights protection of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), ignoring an accommodation order issued by her boss, Presiding Judge Leo Diana, which provides for half-day trial sessions for father with circulatory disability. TAMMY! acts to induce a stroke on a litigant by protracted litigation.

The family case is Sakon v Sakon, which has dragged on relentlessly for six years without a final custody determination for little Odin. The case is fueled by dark money, where a penniless, unemployed mother has expended $400k to the firm of FreedMarcroft to litigate a claim of sole custody on recommendation of quack custody evaluator Linda Smith, PhD, whose expertise in child matters claims best interest for Odin to have no more than one hour a month with his son under supervision for unstated reasons, in direct violation of state law requiring active & consistent involvement of both parents. The parents have enjoyed joint custody of the child for the last four years, with seven hours a week with Dad. The court’s entertainment of the protracted dispute lacks legal foundation, nor can the court find rational basis for cause to modify the existing arrangement, other than to keep the gravy train rolling for the vultures at FreedMarcroft. Family court not driven on best interests, only cold hard cash. Simply Money.

The issues debated before TAMMY! include mother Francelia’s demand that little Odin not play little league, where TAMMY! rendered judgement barring playing ball, where Manchester Little League promptly cut the kid from his team, against the child’s wishes.

TAMMY! is now a defendant in a federal civil rights case filed in D. Connecticut, before Judge Alvin W. Thompson for deprivation of rights in violation of federal ADA law. The incompetence of Connecticut judiciary is remarkable, proving again that CJ Richard Robinson cannot run a court system, cannot train judges, cannot supervise judicial performance, hates children, and defrauds a sovereign people of honest services. The elected representatives who sit on the Judiciary Committee are blind to the impropriety of Robinson’s Branch. The sovereign people are betrayed by all.

A judge who denies a child the right to play baseball, while denying a father federal civil rights protections is a domestic terrorist.

Odin Sakon at Red Sox game with dad, denied right to play little league by order of Connecticut Superior Court
CJ Robinson hates children and baseball.