The Connecticut Judiciary expends huge money paying for retarded idiots to masquerade as family relations counselors in the cesspool of family court. To embellish the jewish charade of custody fights for no state interest, the public is tricked into paying ridiculous salaries to clowns in pretense of providing SERVICES to people in family court. In reality, it is a social welfare program to employ the unemployable performing job functions with no measurable efficacy. For this, Deborah Fuller is paid over $178k/yr to prance around as DIRECTOR of a cash burning operation with no product, other than fat paychecks and fatter pensions.
Here is a listing of the SERVICES that are supposed to be provided to family court litigants by Fuller’s quack organization:
NEGOTIATIONS, MEDIATION, ISSUE FOCUSED CUSTODY EVALUATION, COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION, RECONCILIATION, RESTRAINING ORDERS, CLIENT INITIATED SERVICES, CASE REVIEW, INTAKE ASSIST, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, FAMILY INTAKE SCREEN, FAMILY VIOLENCE INTAKE SCREEN, FAMILY VIOLENCE ASSESSMENT, FAMILY VIOLENCE MANAGEMENT, ACCESS & VISITATION, GENERAL CASE MANAGEMENT, INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT, EARLY INTERVENTION.
The now-famous blog asks the obvious question: For the millions of tax dollars spent on these charlatan counselors, what is the benefit, the efficacy? As usual, in a jew run operation, there is no truthful answer to the question. The tax payer is bled to pay for an organization staffed with child predators that has no measurable value for society. The construction is so bizarre that the ‘counselors’ actually work for the judges themselves. The pay raises, performance evaluations, gold stars, all come from a jewish judge who does not want to hear opinions rooted in Christian context. The counselors are the foot soldiers of Zionism, wreaking havoc on the host society to the glee of the jewish parasite. The construction is alien to the American form of government, which does not allow the judicial branch to engage in social services. The judges cannot keep dockets flowing, why should the department be burdened with what are social services, normally administered through the executive branch of government … in a non-jewish world.
The public asks to see results for spending such money on family services supervision clowns like Deb Fuller ($178k/yr), Joe DiTunno ($145k/yr), Charles Forcier ($136k), Danielle Sanquedolce ($131k), Lisa Richard ($118k), Kathleen Montano ($128k), Aaron Dzamko ($116k), Roger Frigon ($130K), Andrew Spurrier ($126k), Robert Lamontagne ($128k), Michael Del Santo ($128k), Renee Saltzman ($120k), Dorye Jackson ($126k), Sharmaine Abrams ($111k), Christopher Hadad ($135k), Peter Barbone ($132k), Maurice Hill ($130k)? A private club of child predators working directly for jew judges spewing forth jewish venom on unsuspecting parents.
RESULTS? METRICS? EFFICACY? Look at all the cases where children are abused, but there are no services from the overpaid division. Where are all the expert services for the Ambrose kids: Mia, Matthew, Sawyer? Did the Dulos kids get ‘services’ … no! The now-famous blog notes that Baby Aaden’s parents were tossed out of jew court by jew Judge Pinkus, for being poor, referred to family services, then the kid went for a dive off the Middletown Bridge. Expert services or culpable negligence? Is this the standard of state SERVICE provided? Measure the results in dead kids, dead parents, unsolved murders? Curious to note that families ordered to pay for a jew GAL don’t get CSSD FAMILY SERVICES. Cases where the children are being trafficked by the jews simply don’t get state services. Why do private pay jew psychologists like Caverly, Smith, Horowitz, Freedman get appointed when there are state services? Are the state services incompetent? Negligent? It can be concluded that when the jews fleece a family, empty college funds, traffic children, rape childhood, there will be no SERVICES. Pretty telling scam … like it is a racket. Duh!
For the more technically inclined reader, a casual review of the so-called ‘procedures’ that define the ambiguous procedures, there are no references or source documents listed, no professional papers, just a splattering of words on paper making a fuss over definitions, schedules, filing of forms, notices, updating of data bases, lots of descriptions of meetings, but nothing of substance. Generally, all the documentation just outlines talking to litigants, then reviewing with the supervisor. Pretty much procedures for gossip.
