Judge David Gold

Puppet Prosecutor Jack Doyle

A Connecticut prosecution once framed as routine law enforcement has become a test of constitutional restraint. The case of State v. Boyne targets political speech, not criminal conduct, through prolonged process, disputed searches, and delayed disclosure of exculpatory evidence. At issue are core protections: the First Amendment, due process, and limits on prosecutorial power. The controversy raises familiar questions about Brady obligations, cross-border law enforcement, and whether the justice system is being used to punish dissent rather than prove crimes. As discovery deadlines loom, the case now stands as a broader warning about how easily state power can be stretched—and how hard it is to rein it back.

The Hateful Eight: Connecticut case charges a blogger for speech without identifying the alleged threats. A new test for the First Amendment.

The Hateful Eight: Nutmeg Edition

After nearly a decade of Connecticut officials hunting for a speech crime, prosecutors have now charged a blogger with “true threats” based on eight online posts — but they refuse to say which words crossed the line. The case, led by Chief State’s Attorney Patrick Griffin and Judge Peter Brown, raises a chilling question: can the government criminalize political commentary it doesn’t like?
Critics say it’s the latest episode in Connecticut’s long campaign to silence dissent under the guise of “hate speech.” Supporters call it accountability. Either way, the state’s handling of the so-called Hateful Eight may redefine free expression in America’s courts.

JACK DOYLE’S TOOTHPASTE DEFENSE: WE CAN’T PUT IT BACK

Connecticut’s criminal justice system faces new scrutiny after claims that prosecutors bypassed rules of venue and ignored constitutional safeguards. State’s Attorney Jack Doyle has been accused of shifting cases between judicial districts without authority, undermining due process and raising alarms about prosecutorial discretion. Critics argue his reasoning—that errors cannot be undone because “you can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube”—is a dangerous precedent that excuses violations rather than correcting them. Now, questions are mounting about how deeply such practices have taken root in the Nutmeg State, and whether judicial oversight will step in to restore accountability.

Assassinations

The assassination of Charlie Kirk represents the ultimate form of lawless silencing. But political violence isn’t limited to a bullet from a rooftop sniper — it can also come cloaked in a judge’s robe. Judge David Gold’s arrest warrant against a political blogger shows the same contempt for the Constitution, using state power to muzzle dissent. Free speech, due process, and the rule of law fall victim to ideological zealotry. Whether enforced by rifle or gavel, the message is the same: speak against the establishment, and you’ll be punished. America faces an existential battle for its founding freedoms.

Pretend Justice Exposed

Connecticut’s so-called “justice system” is rotting from within, and Jack Doyle is Exhibit A. Paid $215,000 a year, the New Haven State’s Attorney pretends to be a prosecutor, pretends to be a lawyer, pretends to honor the Constitution—but in reality, he’s a puppet for political bosses and outside agendas. Critics say Doyle has weaponized the courts to muzzle speech, crush dissent, and protect the powerful. From illegal warrants to gag orders, from family court tyranny to free press crackdowns, Doyle plays the role of sovereign protector while trampling the very rights he swore to uphold.

First Amendment Allergic Reaction: Judges in the Mist

In Connecticut’s twisted judicial theater, Judge Peter L. Brown nearly choked on the First Amendment—triggered by blog posts and Joette Katz’s authoritarian musings. The blog that drives judges mad, The Family Court Circus, has long skewered Katz, a former justice turned censor-in-chief. Her 2022 op-ed, “When Is Enough Enough?”, drew fire for labeling satire as criminal “threats.” Now, a courtroom transcript reveals Judge Brown’s allergic meltdown over the blog’s political speech, exposing the fragile egos and coordinated efforts of Katz, Gold, Bozzuto, and their DEI-infused judicial gang to weaponize the courts against free expression. The First Amendment’s enemies wear robes.

Anti-Family Court Vigilantes

The Connecticut Speech Police have outdone themselves in traitorous conduct, warring against the Constitution, the First Amendment’s free speech part, whereupon orders of her masters, Detective Trooper Samantha McCord petitions Mickey Garland’s Department of Justice for federal international assistance hunting protected blog speech to demand Dutch authorities assist in the nutmeg witch hunt, as she swears in name of sovereign nutmegs, blog is a hotbed of ‘anti-family court vigilantes’. McCord had been harassing private Dutch citizens by trans-Atlantic email bombardment, demanding information about blog’s cyber server home in the tulip gardens of Amsterdam, but without response by wise Dutchmen, the annoyed trooper dyke conspired with U.S. Attorney Vanessa Roberts-Avery and… Read More »Anti-Family Court Vigilantes

True Threat?

The First Amendment scholars of now-famous Blog provide commentary on Connecticut’s claim of true threats, derived from the defective mind of Chief Justice Richard Robinson, the token jurist, ascended to the high bench on skin color rather than intellect, serving only to terrorize ‘we the people’. Blog provides moot court scenario to highlight dangers of nigger think on First Amendment. A speaker tells victim “I will take you out”. This is spoken word, at close distance, victim sprayed with saliva from the enraged speaker. Nigger Boy Robinson’s court sees “reckless disregard for substantial risk of fear” in the victim and bystanders, even an ordinary person understands ‘take out’ is not… Read More »True Threat?

Samantha & George

The now-famous Blog has identified two peas in a pod who cannot count to First Amendment, idiots in clown costumes, sporting funny hats, badges, guns, no brains, and attitudes to violate rule of law on dog whistle commands from Kernel Stavros Mellekas of the Connecticut State Storm Troopers, all under commie commissioner James Rovella. Meet Samantha McCord and George Jupin, two worthless state employees who double their salary every year by gobbling up overtime pay committing acts of terrorism against free citizens. Blog parenting department notes poor upbringings, probably both abandoned at birth for noted mental defects. The state gestapo employs these two nuts at Computer Crime Lab, a black… Read More »Samantha & George

Rough Equivalent

The now-famous Blog’s expression experts expound upon the federal court’s interpretation of a ‘.50 cal to the head‘ as opined by Justice Breyer of D. Northern California, relying on Ninth Circuit precedent. As always, the juris prudence of Connecticut is at odds with the First Amendment and federal case law. Blog gives a shout out to Judge David Gold who infamously defeated 1A in Footnote 18 of his decision of felony conviction for an email that the dyke on the byke Bozzuto never received. FN18 claims that a ‘rough equivalent’ is the State’s standard for a true threat, proving that Gulag Connecticut does not recognize the Bill of Rights. The… Read More »Rough Equivalent

Mohammad’s Children

Christian societies who insult Islam tend to lose their heads, attract gunfire, have churches burned, and other unfortunate occurrences. Such are the consequences of culture clash and differing beliefs. We Americans can make fun of any religious people, other than the Jews, they are our masters and cannot be criticized. Draw a cartoon of Mohammad, but don’t dare deny that Hitler’s Holohoax exterminated six-million chosen ones. See how the game is played? Take a hard look at the American ‘Family Court’ system. A division of the state judiciary focused on terminating religious marriages and dividing up kids, while looting family savings. There is a belief system behind this secular charade… Read More »Mohammad’s Children

Battle of the Titans

The titans have declared war on each other in the caring and compassionate venue of the land of ‘broken toys’….the cesspool known as Family Court of Connecticut. The Giant of the Profession, The Grey Ponytail, Attorney Norm Pattis has thrown the gauntlet at the hooves of the grand dame pedo battle axe retired judge and child trafficker Attorney Annie Dranginis. The center of this battle is of course children, two gifts from God, Gabriel and Sara. The great legal question is why Tanya Taupier, Aetna human resources vice president can isolate these kids from their father? Not even a phone call since August of last year. The state law of… Read More »Battle of the Titans

Jewdicial Efficieny

So you think that your constitutional right to access the court is a protected by judges in the State of Connecticut? Boy are you mistaken! The state constitution suggests in Article First, Section 10 that: All courts shall be open, and every person, for an injury done to him in his person, property or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law, and right and justice administered without sale, denial or delay. But like everything in Corrupticut, all is not what it appears. The Administrative Judges rule over the dockets before you ever get to court. Cases are decided before the first hearing as the chosen ones in black robes… Read More »Jewdicial Efficieny

Express Yourself

Are you American? Have an opinion? Hate family court? Hate the judges? Well, you have a right to express yourself; First Amendment. Here is an example of how a free citizen in the land of the free and the home of the brave can express himself under the protections framed in the First Amendment. First, identify a judge to hate, say Elizabeth Bozzuto of the Connecticut Family Court. A privileged dyke from a rich republican family whose appointment to the bench was purchased in the back room of political favouritism. It is quite American to hate an individual for ascending to a position of responsibility on privilege of being in… Read More »Express Yourself

Rough Equivalent

Connecticut uses public funds to attack the U.S. Constitution. First Amendment suspended by nutmeg court.