The Jewish Mafia of Corrupticut is hopping mad that the gentiles shit-canned their girl Jane Emons. The Jews are mad. The chosen ones do not take the will of the people lightly, they get their puppets at the New London Day newspaper to spew forth anti-gentile propaganda to strike back at a government of the people, for the people and by the people.
Five stooges of the Day’s self appointed ‘editorial board’ want the gentiles to believe that their government somehow ‘failed’ its duty by flushing Judge Jane Emons down the judicial toilet for being a bad judge. The Editorial clowns want ‘We The People’ to believe that their duly elected representatives somehow failed ‘due process’ in cleansing the bench of jewdicial trash. Let’s examine the zionist propaganda recently published by puppets of the elite.
In the opening line, The Day claims the House of Representatives ‘failed’ to act on reappointment of Emons. But they did act, they took the action of removing the vote from the House calendar. That was an act. No one, not even the jews of the House, moved to put the item back on the calendar, that was an act as well. If there was a majority in favor of the bitch, they acted by doing nothing. The editorial morons are spin doctors in claiming that Emons had some difficult challenge by being assigned to family court…..Oi vey, the bitch asked to be a judge, no one forced her, now the newspaper whines that family court is some terrible assignment….it is a gold mine for the jews of the Bar who bathe in money plundered from families before the court. Make no mistake, more money changes hands in family court than any other court in the country. Judges get kickbacks, lawyers get rich, children get trafficked, family assets plundered. The judges are the ring masters that make the money flow out of retirement accounts, trust funds, college savings and even home equity. Crying for a jew judge in family court is simply zionistic propaganda as the jews designed and operate the family court industry in this country for the sole profit of private agendas. The Jew gorges on the gentile.
The Day overlooks the fact that Judge Emons sold a child. She acted beyond the power of the court to take a child away from a father and assigned custody of the child to a non-family member, absent any interest by the state. She sold a kid. A jew who trades in the child flesh of the gentiles need not sit on the bench of the people’s court. Rule of law undermined by a zionist agenda is tyranny. All Christians, Muslims, Pagans, Hindus held cause to boot Emons off the bench; hats off to the Black and Hispanic Caucus for leading the charge.
Emons did NOT deserve a vote, she deserved nothing. The House held no duty to give her a vote. She is a failed public servant whom the people could no longer stomach on the state pay roll. Her demise was brought about by her own conduct; eight years of the merits were fully evaluated. Her service was terminated by the will of the people. The process of the people, for the people and by the people properly disposed of Emons; why is the Day whining about it? Jewish retaliation? Sour grapes? Judicial retaliation?
The five stooges of the Editorial Board advocate tyranny, treason being an affront to the gentiles’ form of government. They betray the puppet strings to their jewish masters who attempt to scold the people of Connecticut for giving one of the chosen the boot. The Day cites no process, statute, case law or constitutional clause where such a nasty, evil, zionist excuse of a judge ‘deserved’ anything but a kick in the ass and termination of her paycheck. More propaganda by the zionists.
Claiming the House was ‘cowardly’ in invoking the will of a sovereign people does betray the agenda behind the editorial. This does smell of jewdicial retaliation from the black robed mafia. If other family court judges are chilled that they too can suffer the will of the people, then it is a good thing. The ruling elite may realize the power of the people and that there is a rule of law to be upheld. The tree of liberty gets parched from time to time, where jewdicial blood is a thirst quencher.
The Day claims a ‘whisper campaign’ terminated Emons. There were no ‘whispers’. There was screaming, shouting, crying, spilling of the pain and suffering of ‘We the people’ at the hands of this jewish monster’s talmudic form of justice on the gentiles in a rabbinical court. The Day must be hard of hearing to characterize the criticism of Emons’ as whispers. The Day betrays its zionist agenda in its inartful prose, thinly veiled zionist retribution against a sovereign Christian people for taking out the jewdicial trash.
Shame on the Day. The process worked perfectly, as designed, as created by the founding fathers, as protected in the Constitution. Emons is gone.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Judge Emons did not uphold the rule of law, did not conduct herself under the requirements of judicial Canons, applied whimsical discretion based on zionism, deprived citizens of protected rights and sold a child outside the power of the court; the editorial of the Day is quite strange and does not support the American form of government, but acts to undermine the will of the people, the sovereign power of the state. Day Editor Paul Choiniere refused a request to disclose the author of the troubling editorial, but the Editorial Board membership is Publisher Gary Farrugia; Editorial Page Editor Paul Choiniere; Managing Editor Tim Cotter; Retired Deputy Managing Editor Lisa McGinley; and defense/military reporter Julia Bergman. It is of curious public observation that Lisa McGinley and Chief Family Court Judge Elizabeth Bozzuto are both alumnae of Manhattanville College; in this light the editorial lacks integrity.
Free Speech on a billboard, get rid of the bitch.
Judge Emons digging herself a hole before the committee.
Gary Farrugia, jewish puppet publisher of the New London Day.
Tim Cotter, member of Day Editorial Board.
Julia Bergman….jewish?
Paul Choiniere, prints what the jews tell him….zionist puppet.
Dyke Chief Family Destructor Judge Elizabeth Bozzuto and the ghost author of the zionist editorial Lisa McGinley are fellow alumn from this white privilege school. Go figure why the editorial is written against the will of the people. Simple propaganda.
Judge Elizabeth Bozzuto, friend of Lisa McGinley.
A chilling message to other judges…you are next.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
The troubling case of Judge Emons
Published May 15. 2018 5:33PM | Updated May 15. 2018 6:34PM
By The Day Editorial Board
The failure of the state House of Representatives to act on the reappointment of Superior Court Judge Jane B. Emons sends a chilling message to other judges who, like her, are assigned the difficult challenge of presiding in family court.
In no other area of the judicial system are more raw emotions played out and enemies made. It is personal. Typical cases include divorce, child custody, child support, protection from abuse (temporary restraining orders), child abuse, neglect, and termination of parental rights.
Critics of the system say it enriches family-practice lawyers and disenfranchises those who cannot afford quality— or any — legal representation. Those who feel betrayed by the system and its judges have effectively used social media to share their feelings of persecution and organize attacks.
Appointed eight years ago by Gov. M. Jodi Rell, and named for reappointment after her eight-year term by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, Emons confronted this criticism when testifying to the Judiciary Committee last February. Emons faced questions about her demeanor, about being abrupt and not showing proper respect to all those appearing in her court, particularly those without legal representation.
“There have been a couple of situations; no doubt, when I’m sure I did cross the line. I felt that it was important to maintain the decorum and order in the courtroom. Upon retrospect, I’m sure I could have done it differently,” Emons, 67, said during her testimony.
The Judiciary Committee endorsed her confirmation and reappointment by a vote of 30-3.
But the campaign against Emons continued, particularly from the legislature’s Black and Puerto Rican Caucus, which heard complaints that minorities in particular faced unfair treatment in Emons’ court.
The House took the cowardly course. It did nothing. When the session adjourned on May 4, the House had not acted on Judge Emons’ nomination, meaning she is no longer a judge. Stripping a judge of her position without a vote may have been a first for the state.
Emons deserved a vote. And unless the allegations of malfeasance were confirmed and found to be disqualifying, she deserved reappointment.
Other judges assigned to family court must be feeling vulnerable about now. Who will next face attacks in social media for decisions that offend one party or another, or because someone considers their courtroom performance inappropriate? Will they too face the prospects of a campaign to block their future reappointment?
One more factor has made this episode particularly ugly. Emons, who is Jewish, faced anti-Semitic attacks on social media that tried to tie her decisions to her heritage. She had been called in her home and yelled at. These unacceptable attacks provided more reason for the House to step up and decide the nomination on the merits. Quietly walking away from the matter can only embolden those who see their anti-Semitic tactics as successful.
Granted, we don’t know all the facts. Emons herself admitted there were times she should have acted differently. Perhaps a credible case could have been made against her reappointment. But that’s not what happened. Instead, a whisper campaign effectively killed a judge’s nomination. The Senate, which appeared ready to confirm if the House passed the nomination forward, had no ability to act.
The process failed.
The editorial board is composed of the publisher and four journalists of varied editing and reporting backgrounds. The board’s discussions and information gained from its meetings with political, civic, and business leaders drive the institutional voice of The Day, as expressed in its editorials. The editorial department operates separately from the newsroom.
