The best interests standard of talmudic law in family court is a fallacy created by jews to traffic children and loot family savings. What is best interest? Who decides the interest? How has this word-salad created the standard of family law that the world recognizes is totally jewish? Because it is totally jewish.
The protection of infants came under the power of the King, who ruled over his kingdom for the benefit of subjects to the Crown. The King ruled from divine powers passed from God, thru the Church, for the benefit of all, nice story, worked well for many centuries. When the King exercises his powers over children, it is done in the context of Church law, where at the inception of the Court of Chancery is Roman Catholic. In the early 1300’s it is not best interests to take children away from mothers. In 2022, Connecticut jews in black robes think momectomies are wonderful. In historical context family court judges Grossman, Wetstone, Adelman, Bozzuto, Ficeto, Schofield, Solomon, Emons, Munro, and Moukawsher would all suffer a royal beheading at the Tower for their barbaric abuse of the Crown’s infants. Perhaps today they just get a .50cal to the head from a crowd of disgruntled litigants. The power of the Crown is now held by ‘we the people‘ in modern context.
The jews of America have twisted the concept of parens partiae to be unrecognizable in its present form. A power of the Crown, set in context of Church Law, transferred to the sovereign people of the State of Connecticut at the founding, is now vested in black robed paedophiles, Church law usurped by talmudic edicts. The power actually rests in the people at the founding, meaning that no action can be taken against a parent but by petition of the state, acting thru the Attorney General on behalf of the sovereign. Jews of Connecticut simply ignore that little detail, pitting mother against father to the delight of lawyer invoices. The Crown had power to strip a mother of custody for the protection of the infant. The State of Connecticut holds such power, solely exercised by neglect petition brought by the AG. So where did this ‘discretion’ come from in family court? THE JEWS.
Only the jews can turn a simple administrative no-fault divorce action in a secular society into an excuse to loot family savings and initiate a fight over children by the whim of a black robed jew and fellow kikes of the Bar. A fallacy of Talmudic proportions. Keep powder dry, plenty of shot on hand, a few canisters of Zyklon B, these assholes will not leave the bench willingly, nor admit they wield usurped power for which a free people must remedy.
Another history lesson brought to you by the now-famous Blog and its non-jewish corporate sponsors.
