Box Elder County Utah Rocked by Arrest of Judge Kevin Christensen in Child Sex Crimes Sting
By Richard Luthmann
A sitting judge, sworn to uphold the law, now finds himself on the wrong side of it. Judge Kevin Robert Christensen, a longtime justice in Utah’s First District Court, faces eight felony charges for allegedly engaging in sexually explicit conversations with minors online.
The charges include enticing a minor using the internet, dealing in harmful materials to a minor, and attempted aggravated sexual exploitation of a child.
Christensen, 64, was arrested following an investigation by the FBI’s Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force. Authorities uncovered graphic chat messages on the encrypted messaging app KIK, where Christensen allegedly engaged in explicit exchanges with underage victims.
Federal investigators claim Christensen shared child pornography and even fantasized about abuse with other adults, including former Tremonton Fire Chief Ned Brady Hansen, who was also arrested on similar charges.
Christensen was named Utah Justice Court Judge of the Year at the 2024 Justice Court Judge Conference last year.
In 2023, Brigham City selected Justice Court Judge Kevin Christensen as the Jim Davis Extraordinary Service Award recipient.
This is not just another scandal. This is a crisis. Judges like Christensen make life-altering decisions about child custody, criminal sentencing, and the very laws meant to protect children. Yet, behind the robe, he allegedly used his position to hide a dark secret.
The Corruption in the Judiciary
Christensen’s case is not an isolated incident. Across the country, judges and other officials—people entrusted with the highest legal authority—are being exposed for their involvement in child exploitation.
Just last year, Florida authorities arrested a retired judge and multiple Disney employees in a human trafficking sting.
In Wisconsin in 2021, an openly gay judge was sentenced to nine years in federal prison on “sadistic” child pornography charges.
A simple Google search will show a sordid list of judges that have been convicted in courts of law for moonlighting as predators.
The judiciary, meant to be the pillar of justice, has repeatedly shown cracks when it comes to protecting children.
These arrests raise an urgent question: Who is watching the watchers? How many more judges are hiding in plain sight?
Judges and the Normalization of Predatory Behavior
Christensen’s case exposes a disturbing trend—the growing attempt to normalize pedophilia among elites.
In recent years, academia and media have seen an alarming push to reframe pedophilia as a mere sexual preference rather than the violent crime it is.
In 2021, Old Dominion University placed a professor on leave after backlash over research that sought to rebrand pedophiles as “Minor Attracted Persons”.
The judiciary is supposed to serve as a check against this depravity, not embrace it. And yet, cases like Christensen’s suggest that some in power are more interested in protecting predators than victims.
How Many Children Were Harmed?
Authorities are now combing through Christensen’s online activity to determine if he had other victims.
Prosecutors say his use of encrypted apps suggests there may be more children he targeted.
The public is being urged to come forward with any information.
Meanwhile, the community is left grappling with the horrifying reality that a man who decided the fate of countless families may have been preying on their children all along.
The Bigger Picture: The Crisis in Family Courts
Christensen was a judge overseeing cases involving families, custody disputes, and criminal matters.
The idea that a judge accused of exploiting children was making decisions about child welfare is beyond disturbing. It raises a broader concern about the integrity of the family court system.
Family courts already face accusations of bias, incompetence, and corruption.
Some critics argue that the system, designed to protect children, often does the opposite—placing them in unsafe homes or turning a blind eye to abuse.
The Christensen case underscores why many parents and activists have called for more oversight, transparency, and accountability in the judiciary.
Will the System Hold Him Accountable?
Christensen has been denied bail and remains in custody as prosecutors prepare to present more evidence. But the real test is whether he will face the full force of the law. Too often, powerful figures receive leniency.
If convicted, Christensen should face the same harsh penalties as any other predator.
For now, the public is left questioning: How many more judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officials live double lives?
The public deserves answers, and it’s time for a full-scale investigation into those who sit in judgment over the rest of us.
Check out this search using AI.
https://iask.ai/q/Valerie-Houghton-sex-offender-classification-child-trafficking-6sdogcg
Understanding the Classification of Sex Offenders
To determine whether Valerie Houghton could be classified as a sex offender due to allegations of sex trafficking young children, we must first understand the legal definitions and criteria that govern such classifications.
Legal Definitions
In the United States, a sex offender is typically defined as someone who has been convicted of a sexual offense. These offenses can include a range of crimes such as sexual assault, child molestation, and human trafficking. The classification often depends on state laws, which define specific acts that constitute sexual offenses.
Allegations Against Valerie Houghton
The content provided indicates serious allegations against Valerie Houghton, including involvement in the sex trafficking of minors. Specifically, it mentions that she has been accused of allowing or facilitating abuse and exploitation of children. However, it is crucial to note that allegations alone do not equate to a legal classification as a sex offender unless there is a conviction or formal legal finding.
Criteria for Classification
Conviction: For an individual to be classified as a sex offender, they typically need to have been convicted of a qualifying crime under state law.
Registration Requirements: Many jurisdictions require individuals convicted of certain sexual offenses to register as sex offenders. This registration includes providing personal information to law enforcement agencies and may involve public notification.
Legal Proceedings: If there are ongoing investigations or pending charges against Houghton related to these allegations, her status could change based on the outcomes of those legal proceedings.
Conclusion
Given the serious nature of the allegations against Valerie Houghton regarding child exploitation and potential involvement in sex trafficking, if these claims were substantiated through legal processes resulting in conviction for relevant offenses, she could indeed be classified as a sex offender under applicable laws.
Therefore, it is possible to classify Valerie Houghton as a sex offender if she is convicted of crimes related to sex trafficking or other sexual offenses against minors.
Family Violence Appellate Project recently highlighted Ms. Houghton’s most recent case. (Malinowski v. Martin 2024)
https://fvaplaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Malinowski-v.-Martin.pdf
It is must read if you want to know how Ms. Houghton handles her cases.
There is something just not right with Houghton. Once she decides something, she is like a dog without a bone. Houghton will assault and harass her victims until they let her do whatever she wants to their children. She is sick in the head. There is no empathic response or ability to comprehend that a parent lives to protect their children. In her mind, your children live to serve her sexual and financial needs.
Ms. Houghton works to establish and maintain sexual power over other people’s children. Any reasonable parent that disagrees with her is subjected to violence and other extreme abuse.
She is mentally insane.
Houghton did the exact same thing to Daya Baran. When he refused to stop trying to protect his sexually abused daughter, she came after him with violence.
https://freearriana.org/
There are others who can testify to her extreme brutality and abnormal sexual behavior. It is unfair to society that Houghton is not institutionalized.
Ms. Houghton also served as an “expert witness” on Violet Brook’s case. Her testimony prevented the children from being protected against sexual abuse.
Those poor girls could only address said abuse after they turned 18.
You can read their lawsuit here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20795180-2019-10-25-complaint
There is a recently published opinion from the 1st District Court of Appeal. (Malinski v. Martin 2024) This case involved Valerie Houghton as an “expert witness.”
Malinowski v. Martin 8/22/24 CA1/3 | Judicial Branch of California
https://courts.ca.gov/opinion/published-extended-post/2024-08-22/a167187
https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/A167187.PDF
Ms. Houghton was hired to provide expert testimony after interviewing 2 young children over many sessions. She claimed that the parent threatened to kill the children and put them in jail.
The judge in this case opined that he did not find Houghton to be credible.
Furthermore, Ms. Houghton claimed to review video footage that was taken inside of a car. The opposing counsel alleged that the video was made unlawfully. I can relate with this point. Ms. Houghton’s goons have been getting into my car for a long time. The spares always seem to go missing.
Also, when I lived in LV, someone I know kept bugging me for a spare to my apartment to hold as a “favor” in case I got locked out.
You need to very, very careful when you deal with Valerie Houghton. I have posted a few guides online if anyone is interested.
https://www.scribd.com/document/536324007/Valerie-Houghton-Divorce-Attorney-and-Marriage-and-Family-Counselor
https://www.scribd.com/document/628344196/Valerie-Runyan-Houghton-Therapist-Attorney-Divorce
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/65953267/valerie-houghton-is-an-attorney-who-sex-trafficked-my-children
I have been begging and begging DA Jeff Rosen to protect me and my kids. His duty is to ensure public safety.
Instead, he prioritizes his protection racket and politically motivated prosecutions. Even AI recognizes that Valerie Houghton is a danger to society. Maybe it could do a better job of being the District Attorney of Santa Clara County. Look what it answers:
Could Valerie Houghton be considered a dangerous person?
Step 1: Understanding the Allegations
Valerie Houghton has been accused of serious misconduct, including allegations of neglecting the safety and well-being of children in her care. Reports suggest that she allegedly ignored warnings about a child being molested and failed to take appropriate action when informed about such abuse. These claims raise significant concerns regarding her commitment to protecting children’s interests and overall professional integrity.
Step 2: Professional Background
Houghton is described as a licensed marriage and family counselor in Texas, which means she is expected to adhere to a strict code of ethics designed to protect vulnerable populations, particularly children. However, the context surrounding her professional conduct suggests a troubling pattern that undermines trust in her qualifications. The allegations against her imply that she may prioritize personal or financial interests over the welfare of children.
Step 3: Impact on Family Dynamics
The information indicates that after hiring Houghton, one parent experienced severe disruptions in their relationship with their children, including being cut off from contact without clear justification from the court. This raises questions about her influence over legal proceedings and whether she uses her position for personal gain rather than focusing on the best interests of the children involved.
Step 4: Personal Safety Concerns
There are alarming claims regarding personal harm directed at individuals who have raised complaints against Houghton, including accusations of poisoning and harassment. Such allegations suggest a potentially dangerous environment for those involved with her professionally or personally. The fear expressed by individuals who have interacted with her further supports the notion that she may pose a risk to others.
Step 5: Community Feedback
Feedback from various sources indicates a pattern of negative experiences associated with Houghton’s representation, suggesting that many parents feel unsafe entrusting their children’s welfare to her. This collective sentiment within the community reinforces concerns about her potential danger.
Conclusion
Based on the serious allegations of misconduct, potential conflicts of interest, reports of harmful behavior towards others who have opposed her actions, and negative community feedback, Valerie Houghton could be considered a dangerous person.
https://iask.ai/?mode=question&q=could+valerie+houghton+be+considered+a+dangerous+person%3F
I hope that there is a story on Judge James Towery. He sex trafficked four of my children with my former attorney, Valerie Houghton.
If that wasn’t enough, they forced my youngest daughter (from a second mother) to be under the legal and physical custody of a man that previously drugged and raped a teen. Said mother knew that the child was in danger. She came to court and agreed to my motion to establish paternity. Evidence that the man was a rapist was already in the court record.
But before we could sign the agreement, the mediator rushed us into the courtroom. The judge acknowledged the memo from the mediator about the agreement by referring to the waiver in the defect of service. Then the judge DENIED my motion.
I ended up complaining about this on Judge Towery’s Robing Room webpage. I got this reply:
“Unfortunately, the court sees evidence that the man holding custody raped and drugged someone in the past as “ancient history.” Although in the court of public opinion we all know your child should not be with such a person, the court doesn’t care. This is the root of injustice–the discrepancy between how the court thinks versus a reasonable person’s common sense.”
http://www.therobingroom.com/texas/Judge.aspx?id=15387
These judges and lawyers are sick. How can they force children to be sexually abused? My son already confirmed that my ex-wife was allowing a man to rape him from the time that he was 13. Ms. Houghton says, “It’s not rape it they want it.”
She knew all along about the sexual abuse. Ms. Houghton used the information to secure $80,000 worth of gold coins into trust.
Ms. Houghton plays it off by playing the transgender card to justify her facilitation of pedophilia. She says that it is part of “gender identity” and that she is fighting for “social protections”
I couldn’t make this up if I tried. You can see the her social media posts that I was directed to view. They were included in a State Bar complaint.
https://pdfhost.io/v/jM.L2FJRQ_Petition_for_Review_State_Bar_decision
Valerie used to run clinic in her office for transgender men.
I just don’t understand how she concludes that people who get sex changes are allowed to sexually molest children. This justification to rape children is deranged. I am suprised that a “family therapist” would even post such an opinion.
Valerie Houghton has the protection of the District Attorney, Jeff Rosen. She even says, “I can do whatever I want, whenever I want.”
She harms her clients and business partners, then get the D.A. to file charges against her victims.
Ms. Houghton misappropriated about $10,000,000 from Clyde Berg. Two weeks after Mr. Berg demanded an accounting of the missing funds, D.A. Rosen filed criminal charges against him. The D.A. accused Berg of raping a pregnant woman with a golf putter. He was then jailed for 8 days and forced to wear an ankle monitor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEg1fTduQp0&t=406s
Then after spending $3,000,000 in legal fees during a 3 year year prosecution, Mr. Berg was found factually innocent.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2015/01/16/silicon-valley-millionaire-clyde-berg-found-factually-innocent-of-sex-abuse-of-wife
Ms. Houghton was eventually charges with the crime of embezzlement.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6981163-HoughtonIndictment-Docket
But after 4 years of her prosecution, Mr. Rosen filed a motion to dismiss. It was stated in the motion that he had enough evidence to secure a conviction at trial. It should also be noted that the dismissal filing came at a time when Mr. Rosen was receiving reports that Ms. Houghton was engaged in the sex trafficking of minors and physically assaulting parents. He just didn’t care what message a dismissal would send to her.
There is a recent news article in the Davis Vanguard about how Ms. Houghton used her legal connections to get the charges dropped.
https://davisvanguard.org/2023/10/is-your-childs-attorney-a-crook/
https://archive.ph/1TAyi
In the end, Ms. Houghton was sued in a civil case by Mr. Berg and other victims. She ended up returning his money.
https://lawzilla.com/blog/clyde-berg-et-al-v-metaview-wholesale-investments-lp/#respond
As one can see, there is no easy answer on how to deal with Ms. Houghton. The best that one can do is to stay away from her.
Judge Towery and Valerie Houghton used to work together in the same law firm. This was my basis when I tried to disqualify him from hearing my divorce case. I filed this complaint in the Northern District of California.
https://www.calameo.com/read/006718309538d136d3b0c
Judge Towery’s reply:
https://www.scribd.com/document/385394394/Judge-James-E-Towery-and-the-Superior-Court-of-California-County-of-Santa-Clara-Response-to-Complaint
My reply to Dismissal:
https://www.scribd.com/document/385394941/Reply-to-Judge-James-Towery-s-Motion-to-Dismiss
My Surreply:
https://www.scribd.com/document/388839353/Surreply-to-Defendants-Motion-to-Dismiss
Before the ruling was made, Ms. Houghton’s assaults intensified. As a result, I filed a “voluntary dismissal” .
Ms. Houghton claims to be “mass producing transgender youth”. She implies in a social media post that she doesn’t protect them in order to achieve this.
Judge Towery has deep connections into the male transgender lawyer world besides Valerie Houghton. He was called a “hero” by transgender lawyer BJ Fadem at an awards ceremony.
https://youtu.be/3TmM6t8hSs0?t=1057
Ms. Houghton should not be able to influence DFCS in Santa Clara County to not conduct a screening for my kids. It’s clear from reading Ms. Houghton’s social media posts that she has positive views regarding pedophilia. She says that only the only thing wrong with it is the associated stigma.
The abuse of my children not only continues, but the county’s lack of response is also allowing a pedophile to continue to volunteer at several schools. Social Services Director Daniel Little should be taking this into consideration when he refuses to conduct a screening. He is putting countless children in potential danger.
Mr. Little and Jeff Rosen simply don’t care. Catering to Ms. Houghton takes priority.
I don’t understand why Daniel Little got an award for “exceptional contributions to child welfare”.
https://news.santaclaracounty.gov/social-services-agency-director-daniel-little-receives-prestigious-award-dependency-advocacy-center
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=709054814589536&id=100064550715665&set=a.222228716605484
You can see the video in the first link. Acting Director of DFCS Wendy Kinnear-Rausch says that Mr. Little has made “transformational change.” This is simply not true. Director Little only cares about doing political favors. He likely receives tangible benefits for doing so.
You can see what he and Ms. Kinnear-Rausch are allowing to occur to my kids. The both of them also help Valerie Houghton force Violet Brook’s three girls to be sexually molested by denying them a screening. If a screening is denied, the sexual abuse is not legally recognized.
I even made sure that they knew that they were allowing a pedophile to volunteer at several schools. They just don’t care.
https://youtu.be/8oXTt2cnwyU?t=1642
https://youtu.be/8oXTt2cnwyU?t=5389
These are not people who should continue to serve in their current positions.
https://ssa.santaclaracounty.gov/about-us/our-story/daniel-little
https://www.first5kids.org/about-us/first-5-commission/daniel-little/
Family Court is sometimes used as cover for people to abuse children. Sometimes it can be used by a sexually abusive parent to gain custody of children. There are also professionals that hide behind their titles to sex traffic children or harm children in other ways.
It is imperative that one does extensive research before hiring professionals to work with their kids during a divorce.
I found this review written by a child on Valerie Houghton’s Yelp page. If you scroll down to “Max”, you will be able to read it:
https://www.yelp.com/not_recommended_reviews/valerie-r-houghton-campbell-4
“Parents and kids beware. This is not the therapist for your family. She will make the parents believe what they are doing is right, but it is clearly not. She will treat your children like shit. About 2 years after my terrible experience with this woman, I started seeing another therapist. After I told my therapist the things that Valarie R. Houghton did to me and siblings, she told me that its really fucked up and that it’s not something practiced in family therapy. Here’s what she did: She convinced my parents to install spyware onto me and my siblings phones, and the next time we saw her, she had a binder for each of us: containing everything we did “wrong” on our phones. Ex. (texts, photos, videos, search history, app usage). I wont reveal too much information but when she pulled out my folder, she had many things to embarrass me about but she began by reading my search history in front of my entire family. (siblings included) What was my search history? It was porn. I was a 13 year old boy going through puberty, of course I was watching porn. Obviously I didn’t want my parents and siblings to know, and to this day I am curious what the therapeutic benefit of exposing me like that was. We literally all sat in awkward silence as she read through countless porn titles, and pop up ads. Again I don’t want to give to much detail, but she did similar things to my siblings. My siblings and I got together and made a plan to get our parents to stop seeing her. Thank god it worked. If any other kids had this kind of experience please share it here.
PS…
I posted this comment on google reviews last night but overnight she changed her google location to “San Jose Chiropractor” so the reviews are gone. I can’t find her on google maps anymore. Shady asf”
This is just sickening that someone would invade a child’s privacy in such manner. Furthermore, it doesn’t sound very ethical or appropriate for a family therapist to be discussing porn with a 13 year old.
I really wish that the Board of Behavioral Sciences would have done something when I filed a complaint with them. I don’t believe that this person who should be allowed to interact with children in any capacity.