By Richard Luthmann
TheFamilyCourtCircus.com, The World-Famous Blog known for its unfiltered critique of the family court system, has now opened its articles to reader comments. This change invites readers to engage directly with the blog’s contributors and content, fostering a more interactive community.
The blog has consistently provided candid opinions on various subjects, including judicial decisions and legislative actions. By enabling comments, it now offers readers a platform to share their perspectives, insights, and experiences related to these topics.
This move aligns with a broader trend in digital media, where audience engagement is key to building vibrant online communities. Allowing comments can enhance discussions, provide diverse viewpoints, and strengthen the connection between content creators and their audience.
This feature means readers can now participate in conversations sparked by the blog’s posts. Whether agreeing, disagreeing, or adding new information, readers have the opportunity to contribute to the discourse.
TheFamilyCourtCircus.com‘s decision to open articles to comments marks a significant step toward greater reader involvement. This change enriches the content and empowers readers to voice their opinions, making the blog a more dynamic and inclusive platform.
What do you think about The World-Famous Blog? Comment below.
No one should be able to jail a person for expressing their first amendment rights.
I was also jailed after complaining about my former attorney. Said attorney arranged my prosecution without me have even commited a crime. The whole goal was to have me declared mentally unfit for trial, and to absolve her of her violent acts and child sex trafficking.
You can read more here:
https://www.scribd.com/document/628344196/Valerie-Runyan-Houghton-Therapist-Attorney-Divorce
There is so much corruption in the courts. Valerie Houghton has taught me that most people have a price. People who claim to protect children will just ignore reports of child abuse if she is involved. And the District Attorney will allow Ms. Houghton to physically assault the person that he is prosecuting.
Even the State Bar of California will not act. They just don’t care about what these lawyers are doing.
You can read my complaint here and the response here:
https://pdfhost.io/v/jM.L2FJRQ_Petition_for_Review_State_Bar_decision
Valerie Houghton is a homicidal lawyer/therapist/nurse. She is absolutely unhinged to have POISONED me just because I don’t want my kids raped. This isn’t a one type deal. There are many other victims out there.
Daya Baran is another person. He caught his father in-law molesting his toddler daughter. When he tried to complain, he was stalked, prosecuted, given a restraining order, and POISONED.
As a result of the poisoning, the pigmentation in his face was damaged and he became a diabetic.
You can see the pictures here:
https://freearianna.org/story
https://archive.ph/qCjGd
Ms. Houghton refuses to deny any involvement.
Violent people like Valerie should not be allowed to freely assault people. I hope that more reporters can report on this.
Hi Richard, I wanted to follow up on the father facing jail time in Connecticut. It’s never a great way to deal with family court problem to jail someone. Upon a review of court documents his actions follow the pattern in CT. A request for child support is placed in family court. Due to the unwed couple material status a paternity test was ordered. He was the father. An emergency order for custody was requested from the dad. Denied. Now we want to save our ” family” money?
Mr. Luthmann,
Please stop your foolishness with this now World-Famous Blog. It is threatening to expose a great many “Inconvenient Truths” about the Nutmeg State.
Be a good boy and obey. Or else you will see my fangs.
JK (not Rowling)
Is that you, Justice Katz?
I have an important question about the First Amendment and Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/315us568
You said that case was good law for True Threat legal methodology and free speech analysis.
Many disagree. That case involved harassment of a Jehovah’s Witness (Hitler killed them en masse too).
The opinion was issued by the same court that issued the Korematsu decision, legalizing the internment of Japanese-Americans.
If Chaplinsky is still good, does that mean the government can still “round up” people they don’t like for things they say that we don’t like, no matter how absurd or “untrue” a threat may actually be?
I’m asking for a friend.
His name is Donald. If all that stuff is still on the table, he can have some real fun with the pink-haired garbage pail kids that are still clinging to their pronouns.
Let me know. You have a standing invitation to visit with Michael Volpe and myself on The Unknown Podcast and explain you views.
https://luthmann.substack.com/s/the-unknown-podcast
Richard Luthmann is dreamy. But not as dreamy as Mike Volpe. He’s my little stud muffin.