The omnipotent great grey ponytail of New England is omnipotent! Norm Pattis knows what Connecticut judges know … all of them! The fallacy arguments of tossed word-salad passing for legal arguments in the cesspool of nutmeg courts is ludicrous. Hardly unexpected given the lack of intellect of the players who make up the inbred cadre of the professional practice of law. Connecticut may just be the receptacle for all the incompetent individuals who suffer from delusional psychosis of being a lawyer. The country may be the land of the free and the home of the brave, but New Haven is a magnet for the stupid.
Norm! files a ‘writ of error‘ on the insanity of a jewcdicial act to disbar a zealous advocate for being a zealous advocate in an adversarial system. Only jews, communists, terrorists, enemies of the Constitution act to assassinate an advocate pleading for rights in protection of a member of the public. Not a big deal to pen a writ to the appellate court that there is a rogue judge in family court assassinating advocates, undermining the integrity of the court, violating Canon, scaring the shit out of the public that the court is a rogue tyrant, something Blog readers have known for years. But Norm makes an ass of himself in the most twisted form of lawyer logic by using Blog as a free speech test. Norm argues at 16 in his writ:
“The claims of Semitic favoritism bore an uncanny similarity to claims routinely raised by a certain blog that routinely publishes hostile commentary about the Connecticut family courts, to wit: Family Court Circus. This blog is well known to members of the Connecticut judiciary, and it refers to particular judges using inflammatory racial and ethnic characterizations, even referring to the judges of the family courts as the “Jewdiciary”. As obnoxious and distasteful as the blog contents may be, the speech asserted there is protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.“
Blog editors find Norm’s prose of poor quality and lacking legal purpose. The now-famous Blog was not mentioned in Judge Moukawsher’s shredding of the Fourteenth Amendment under color of state licensing. Norm makes feeble connection between free expression of jewery in cyberspace to Judge Moukawsher’s assassination of an advocate in violation of the redress clause of the First Amendment; quite a stretch. Norm opines that Blog is protected speech, which is in opposition to Jewette Katz opinion published in Law Tribune that Blog is not protected speech. Oi Vey, the twisted arguments just expose jewism in Nutmeg jurisprudence. But the curious aspect of the twisted prose is how Norm can honestly state that BLOG IS WELL KNOWN TO MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY. How does Norm know this? Is he pals with all the judges, does he attend dinner parties to discuss what judges know? Ex parte communication? The statement is odd, but begs the question if Norm is completely delusional or only partially so. In reality, the judges hate Norm and his ponytail.
Time to call a spade a shovel. The writ of error seeks to reverse the misconduct of the wrath of Moukawsher who was directed by his jewish masters to assassinate the advocate for the sin of calling out the jewery in the Ambrose case. A simple statement of fact that the players raping the childhood of Mia, Matthew, and Sawyer are all jews brings down the wrath of the jewdicial overlords. The advocate is crushed in public example to all others who dare speak of the jewdicial mafia of family court. Rape of children and theft of savings is the realm of the jew, which will not be disturbed on complaint of the goy.
Norm should just focus on the jewdicial terrorism unleashed on a sovereign people.
