The now-famous Blog provides public warning about the ‘custody evaluation’ ordered in Connecticut family court. The evaluator is blessed by the jewdiciary with ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY to which unsuspecting parents and unrepresented children will fall victim. The dangers of family court are constructed by the jew of the judicial branch under the soul-less black leadership of Chief Justice Richard Robinson. Never in the history of the republic has the sovereign ever bestowed such immunity for a person to provide an opinion on constitutionally protected parent-child bonds. A construction so evil, so inhumane, so un-American that it can only be talmudic law enacted on the goy. Blog examines the wording of an appointment order of jew Dr. Jessica Biren Caverly, PhD, a state licensee in the practice of psychology as defined under law Chapter 383. To wit:
Dr. Caverly shall undertake a private forensic custody and psychological evaluation of the parties and their minor children to include psychological evaluations with custody and access recommendations and any other testing of the parties and/or child as deemed necessary and appropriate by the Evaluator, in accordance with all professional practices. Dr. Biren Caverly shall evaluate and examine the mental health of the parties and the minor children to prepare and provide the court with a comprehensive assessment and report to assist the court in determining the appropriate resolution of the custody and parental access pursuant to the statutory factors as set forth in GS §46b-56(c). The evaluation may include, but shall not be limited to, at the Evaluator’s discretion, psychological testing of the parties and/or the minor children, drug and/or alcohol evaluations and/or testing, home visits, interviews, records requests, court documents, interactions with collateral information sources; and interaction and discussion with the GAL. The parties shall pay for the evaluation, but shall not be provided a copy of the report.
Word Salad Analysis
Forensic
The use of funny legal beagle words by the jewdicial authority is designed to obscure the jewish intent of manipulating the rule of law to undermine constitutional protections in application of talmudic law in the rabbinical court. Dictionary definition of FORENSIC is: ‘relating to or denoting the application of scientific methods and techniques to the investigation of crime’. Blog aficionados know that psychology is not a science, it is merely the study of the human condition, there is no method contained in the study that is remotely scientific. Of course, there is no ‘crime’ before the court, other than the jewish agenda of familial destruction under the color of law.
Custody and Psychological Evaluation
A Christian society holds no standard of evaluating custody. In the eyes of God, parents are parents, the parents and the children make a family, the behavior of a typical dysfunctional American family lends itself to no evaluation, except where there is a rabbinical court who will impose unrecognized, non-statutory standards to destroy the goy. The added gem of ‘psychological’ evaluation is a wild card for the jew evaluator to create any opinion for maligning any individual subjected to what is a Fourth Amendment violation. The state has no cause disrupt parent-child bonds for fit parents where one merely seeks to dissolve the pointless bond of marriage under secular law. The term ‘evaluation’ just means ‘opinion’. The court of law, bound by due process, is ordering a jew to give an OPINION on a goy family … a clear violation of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Parties and Minor Children
The ‘parties’ are two parents, the only litigants in divorce court. Only the married individuals are under the jurisdiction of the court for the cause of dissolution of marriage by the ‘no-fault’ standard. The divorce cannot be denied, so why are the children being investigated? More jewery. An unnecessary invasion of privacy of unrepresented minors wielded in tyrannical wrath by the monsters in black robes promoting their private jewdicial agenda. Two parents in family court are fit by definition as the state has not charged them to be unfit. The family court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to challenge custody rights absent the interest of the state. An exercise of the ancient royal parens patriae power, a parent can only be stripped of custody in protection of the child, which under the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause requires the matter be taken to juvenile court by the Attorney General with counsel appointed for the child. Needless to say the jews running family court know this, but toss word salad so no one recognizes what they are really doing … destroying an enlightened society one family at a time.
Psychological Evaluations
What the fuck is this? Translate to English, psychological is a multi-syllable word referring to the mind. Evaluation means opinion. The judge uses ten syllables to say ‘mind opinion’. How in due process is the third party jewish opinion of one’s mind relevant to granting an administrative ‘no-fault’ divorce? What is the legal basis for the jewish opinion of the mind of a goy family?
Custody and Access Recommendations
The power of the state to grant a divorce is vested in the Superior Court. Why is this state entity asking a private jew for RECOMMENDATIONS as to the legal rights of the family? See the jewery? The jewdicial authority asks the private paid jew to make suggestions to fuck over the goy. The state is deferring judgement vested in the court to a jew with ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY of opinion, paid for by the victimized parents under the color of state law. The practice of the jew judges is to turn these ‘recommendations’ into orders of the court without question, as the court deems a jew psychologist to be an expert on goy families, such being the conversion of the Superior Court to the rabbinical court under law of the Talmud … in full public view, blessed by the legislature and protected by a black man in a black robe who heads the chosen Branch. Of great constitutional import is that jew Caverly recommends isolation of child from mother in derogation of the Fourteenth Amendment which recognizes the parent-child bond as fundamental liberty interest for which a jew’s opinion is irrelevant. In short, the jew judge orders free citizens (parents) to pay a jew to recommend violating the Constitution. Did not see that one coming did you?
Evaluator’s Necessary Testing
The Superior Court authorizes the jew evaluator to preform any tests on the goy victims. This is a violation of the Fourth Amendment regarding search warrants. The Court delegates all of its authority to the jew evaluator to conduct unreasonable searches. There are no ‘tests’ in the area of psychology relevant to the parent-child bond. It is just more jewish word salad to permit government intrusion to destroy families for the zionist agenda.
Professional Practices
Now the jew judge alludes to professional practices. The judge does not cite the practices, nor identify the professional approval authority, just tosses up an air sandwich, authorizing the jew evaluator to unleash holy hell on a family at whim and with chosen authority. The Superior Court enables child trafficking by improperly authorizing the chosen ‘evaluator’ to malign at will, in defiance of due process, while making goy parents pay for the abuse, with no recourse as the offender acts with ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY … only jews can construct such a defeat to protected rights, only retarded nutmegs of the legislature permit such.
Examine Mental Health
The judge orders an examination of mental health of the family, another meaningless string of words that suggest a standard to which the nefarious term ‘mental health’ is abused. How does a psychologist comply with this court order? Mom, Dad, sister, brother, dog need examinations in order for one parent to obtain an exit from a meaningless marriage in the eyes of the state? What is the standard of mental health implied by the court? How does the Court comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title II by discriminating against persons for perception of variations in the undefined realm of mental health? The parents are not unfit, the children are not victims of abuse/neglect, but the court disrupts fundamental liberty interests on the basis of the third party jewish opinion. If equal protection exists, then all divorces require mental health examinations, right? No!!! Only families with money get evaluations. Poor folk don’t have need for private pay jewish evaluations. It is the discretion of the court, upon reviewing the financial condition of the family that creates the need for such intrusion.
Comprehensive Assessment
Again the jew judge employs misleading language to obscure the jewdicial intent of goy familial destruction. Comprehensive means ‘complete’. Assessment means ‘estimation’. The judge orders parents to pay the jew to proved a ‘complete estimate’ of the family on which the court will rely to issue the administrative ‘no-fault’ divorce, while invading the privacy of a family for the singular purpose of fabricating evidence to strip a fit parent of custody, cut off visitation, undermine constitutional protections, for the sole purpose of advancing the jewish agenda of societal destruction, one family at a time.
Resolve Custody & Parental Access
The family court holds no jurisdiction to isolate a child from a parent. The family court is a court of equity, where parental rights cannot be abridged absent state petition. The Superior Court cannot take up a claim of one parent against the other that the child should be isolated. Two fit parents, a normal dysfunctional American family before the rabbinical court of Connecticut becomes financial fuck fest, feeding lawyers, therapists, evaluators, co-ordinators, supervisors, even an email system (OFW), all to benefit societal parasites known as jews. State statute §46b-56(b) requires active & consistent involvement of both parents in the lives of children, a requirement ignored by judges. Raping childhood and draining family savings is the true purpose of the judges of family court, don’t think it is anything else. Stripping a mother of custody, denying access to her child can only be done on petition of the state in protection of the child in juvenile court. The family court works outside of due process in full public view, in defiance of the will of the people, with the blessing of the legislature that treats children as creatures of the state in violation of the federal Constitution.
Statutory Factors
The jewdicial authority cites the word salad created by the legislature which enumerates sixteen pointless points for the court to consider as cause to disturb parental rights. State statute §46b-56(c) is the color of law that violates the Civil Rights Act of 1871, designed to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment. The state statute directs the judge to consider one or more of the sixteen or none of the sixteen or anything else the judge can think of, to traffic a child for a perverse agenda. A system of laws that is illegal under 18 USC §242, used everyday to inflict constitutionally proscribed pain and suffering at the hand of the rabbinical court of Connecticut.
Vendor Status
How is Dr. Caverly known to the court? She is not vetted by the state as an approved vendor to services related to dissolution action. On what does the court rely to appoint this stranger danger to invade the sanctity of a family? Well, the testimony of the GAL of course! A lawyer serving with ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY testifies to the court the acceptability of a un-vetted court whore with ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY to fuck over a family. See how word salad defeats any form of due process in the rabbinical court. The judge even cites “the court’s own previous experience” with Caverly, like she holds some undocumented approval within the cesspool of jewdicial powers, not enumerated nor disclosed to the public. The court forces parents into a commercial contract to a third party, no standard of service, no warranties, no guarantees, while the court conceals the blessing of ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY. So clever, so tricky, so illegal, so jewish!
Enuff?
Had enough of the constitutional deprivations inflicted by the Branch run by the dumb nigger in the black robe? Think Chief Justice Robinson is Free At Last!!! That perhaps he needs a good ole fashion lynching for child protection and to restore constitutional protections of ‘we the parents’? Does a well regulated militia need to bare arms, lock and load, hunt and dispatch vermin of family court? Assassinate the tyrannical judges, a .50cal to the head defeats the ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY of evaluators, shotgun blasts pierce the GAL immunity, sniper shots from concealed locations take out lecherous lawyers of the Bar’s family section, parenting co-ordinators, visitation supervisors, counselors go up in flames of a dumpster fire, then the court is cleansed of its jewish poison.
Editor’s Note: Connecticut law does not recognize discriminatory opinions of custody/visitation under the regulated practice of psychology, proving judges do not follow the law, nor does the legislature ensure it. Pretty much communism, the children are creatures of the State of Connecticut, parents mean nothing.
