Skip to content

Free Speech

I'll Sue You: “Federal bill” author Francesca Amato loses IRS status, threatens journalists, and faces backlash for alleged self-enrichment.

I’LL SUE YOU!: Francesca Amato’s Legal Lesson

    Francesca Amato, the self-proclaimed “author” of a federal bill, is under fire for threatening journalist Michael Volpe with a defamation suit after he fact-checked her Family Justice & Accountability Act — a “bill” that doesn’t exist in Congress. Her nonprofit lost tax-exempt status, she once paid herself 80% of donations, and her cease-and-desist letters read more like tantrums than legal threats. Critics say she’s misleading desperate parents for fame, not reform. Is Amato a fearless advocate—or just another back-biter capitalizing on chaos? Richard Luthmann’s scorching inquiry and IRS revelations demand answers she refuses to give.

    FYGA Paul Boyne: A polite email to a Connecticut judge sparks outrage, exposing the Nutmeg State’s deep contempt for the First Amendment.

    FYGA Paul Boyne

      Paul Boyne, founder of The Family Court Circus and champion of the constitutional republic, is once again under judicial fire in Connecticut’s “Nutmeg” courts. His crime? Sending an email. Boyne’s polite but pointed message to Judges John Newson and Gerald Harmon sparked outrage among the black-robed elite, who responded not with reason—but with rage. “INAPPROPRIATE,” Newson thundered. In a state where “FYGA” (“F*** You Go Away”) is the unofficial judicial motto, Boyne’s message was treated not as a plea for justice, but as heresy against the sacred cult of Connecticut law.

      SHAKA CHEKA

      Shaka Cheka

        Connecticut’s court system faces renewed scrutiny after reports surfaced of an internal “judicial intelligence” network operating beyond public oversight. Critics claim the system shields misconduct and suppresses constitutional rights under the guise of confidentiality. Judge Peter Brown’s recent protective order, sealing a 96-page report tied to a high-profile political commentator, has sparked outcry among legal observers and civil libertarians. They argue the order expands state secrecy at the expense of public accountability. The controversy underscores a broader concern: that Connecticut’s judiciary has evolved into a self-policing institution immune from the transparency it demands of others.

        Arizona Family Court Revolt: Rep. Lisa Fink leads against racketeering, DCS failures, and mourns Charlie Kirk while defending free speech.

        Arizona Family Court Revolt: Rep Lisa Fink Takes on Power Brokers and Defends Free Speech

          Arizona Rep. Lisa Fink never planned to lead a family-court revolt. A desperate father’s call about “reunification camps” pushed her into battle. “This is not America. This is North Korea,” she said. Fink drafted SB 1372 banning camps, exposing what she calls systemic racketeering in Arizona’s courts. Judges ignore best-interest laws, order costly “therapeutic interventionists,” and silence children’s voices. She’s pushing bills to stop runaway custody orders, fix DCS failures, and support kinship care. Fink also mourns the assassination of Charlie Kirk, vowing to defend free speech. Her crusade now challenges power brokers in law, politics, and culture.

          Judge Boots Black Journalist, Admits Race Was Reason?

            An Oregon administrative hearing exploded into a constitutional fight when OAH Judge Jennifer H. Rackstraw booted Black investigative reporter Rick LaRivière. According to an unofficial transcript, Rackstraw answered “Yes” when asked if she was excluding him for being Black and a journalist, then claimed Oregon law required secrecy. LaRivière refused to leave. He demanded a written order to “file an emergency petition with the Federal District Court.” The state moved to delay. Rackstraw shut it down and reset it in person—promising LaRivière “will not be allowed in.” DOJ counsel Rachel E. Bertoni stayed silent on the record as the Star Chamber vibe spread.

            Pretend Justice Exposed

              Connecticut’s so-called “justice system” is rotting from within, and Jack Doyle is Exhibit A. Paid $215,000 a year, the New Haven State’s Attorney pretends to be a prosecutor, pretends to be a lawyer, pretends to honor the Constitution—but in reality, he’s a puppet for political bosses and outside agendas. Critics say Doyle has weaponized the courts to muzzle speech, crush dissent, and protect the powerful. From illegal warrants to gag orders, from family court tyranny to free press crackdowns, Doyle plays the role of sovereign protector while trampling the very rights he swore to uphold.

              First Amendment Allergic Reaction: Judges in the Mist

                In Connecticut’s twisted judicial theater, Judge Peter L. Brown nearly choked on the First Amendment—triggered by blog posts and Joette Katz’s authoritarian musings. The blog that drives judges mad, The Family Court Circus, has long skewered Katz, a former justice turned censor-in-chief. Her 2022 op-ed, “When Is Enough Enough?”, drew fire for labeling satire as criminal “threats.” Now, a courtroom transcript reveals Judge Brown’s allergic meltdown over the blog’s political speech, exposing the fragile egos and coordinated efforts of Katz, Gold, Bozzuto, and their DEI-infused judicial gang to weaponize the courts against free expression. The First Amendment’s enemies wear robes.

                Black Chief Justice Raheem Mullins

                Judicial Speech Police

                  In the People’s Republic of Connecticut, free speech now comes with a security review. A shadowy branch within the judiciary—led by DEI apparatchiks like Chief Justice Raheem Mullins and Marshal Services Director O’Donovan Murphy—has redefined citizen dissent as “threats” against judges. Under the guise of “judicial security,” the state now spies on political speech, targeting bloggers and critics with an unaccountable Office of Protective Intelligence. But where are the arrests, prosecutions, or public threat definitions? Nowhere. The speech police are here, cloaked in robes and race-baiting rhetoric, declaring war on the First Amendment—because the judiciary can’t take the heat.

                  Cinderella's Balls Get Busted: Connecticut officials target citizens for free speech under false “unauthorized practice” claims.

                  CINDERELLA’S BALLS GET BUSTED

                    Cinderella’s Balls Get Busted: Connecticut officials target citizens for free speech under false “unauthorized practice” claims.

                    Under New Management

                    UNDER NEW MANAGEMENT

                      Under New Management: World-Famous The Family Court Circus Blog! Richard Luthmann leads a bold fight: free speech and exposing corruption.

                      The Inadequate Judge Green

                        Judge Ernest Green, Jr. is a pathetically inadequate excuse for a judge.  Another faggot friend of Gov. Dannel Malloy, nominated to the bench for his expertise in homosexual activities, deviant conduct and of course for being black.  Not a brain in this boy’s head that has not been fucked out his ass by fellow sodomites of the Connecticut deviant elites. Draping a black sodomite with a judicial robe does not bring forth justice; just the opposite.  Green is a puppet of the white jewish overlords of the Connecticut Judiciary.  Judge Elliot Solomon pulls the stings on the indebted judges of the trial courts to promote talmudic edicts in support of… Read More »The Inadequate Judge Green