Pseudoscience & Corruption: The Custody Evaluator Con Job
By Elena Belogolovsky
Imagine a judge gambling your child’s future on a psychic’s hunch. Sounds insane? Welcome to family court, where custody evaluations—touted as expert science—decide who gets your kids. These reports, penned by mental health pros, guide judges on parenting plans, safety, and visitation.
The pitch: Judges need psychologists to decode family chaos. The truth? It’s a cesspool of pseudoscience, bias, and corruption that’s selling out kids—and you’ll be livid when you see how deep this scam runs.
Custody evaluations promise objectivity: interviews, psych tests, record reviews—sounds legit, right? Wrong. They’re a house of cards built on shaky methods and evaluator greed, not evidence. Picture designing a skyscraper with a Magic 8-Ball instead of blueprints—absurd, yet that’s the vibe. Courts lap up these reports like gospel, but they’re closer to tea-leaf readings than science, with kids paying the price.
The Fraud Hits Home
As a scientist and divorced mom, I lived this nightmare. My ex’s lawyer, Darren Holst, demanded an evaluator. I dove into research—peer-reviewed studies, not rumors—and found a sham. I emailed Dr. Evans, then-president of the American Psychological Association, begging for insight.
Here is the response that I received:
I pleaded with the judge: “This isn’t science!” His reply? He essentially said he skips these costly evaluations unless someone can pay—and since my ex could, we were getting one. Cash trumped reason.
Then it got worse. My ex and his lawyer picked Arnold Shienvold—red flags everywhere. Online, parents trashed him: biased, sloppy, a disaster. He’d been scrubbing those damning reviews like a pro, but I was faster—I’d screenshotted them before they vanished. And the mothers? They’re relentless, reposting their horror stories every time he wipes them out.
When I asked Shienvold about these reviews, he said happy clients don’t post reviews. I showed the reviews to the judge; he shrugged. Mothers who’d faced him shared their horror stories with me—reports so absurd I’d have laughed if they weren’t real.
Shienvold was under PA Department of State investigation yet still greenlit. Why? He’s a Judicial Conduct Board of PA insider and ex-AFCC (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts) president—a clique of lawyers, judges, and evaluators raking in cash while kids suffer. More on that racket later.
Family Court’s Biggest Scam: Pseudoscience, Not Protection
Custody evaluations should be rock-solid—data-driven, testable, valid, and reliable. Instead, they lean on junk like Rorschach tests, debunked for custody use by experts like Scott Lilienfeld and his colleagues in 2000. Bias runs rampant: evaluators favor whoever pays more.
Contrast a lab’s precision with this: a fortune-teller’s booth in a psych degree’s clothing. Courts don’t care—Shienvold’s conflicts screamed “rigged,” yet the judge waved it through. It’s not science; it’s a grift.
A Rigged Game
Family courts aren’t constitutional sanctuaries—they’re administrative meat grinders where evidence bends to power. Shienvold’s case proves it: a connected player, dodging scrutiny while parents bleed. The AFCC ties evaluators to judges and attorneys in a profit triangle—$80,000 evaluations aren’t cheap, and someone’s cashing in. My judge admitted cost usually stops these, but cash screamed louder.
Family Court’s Biggest Scam: The Stakes Are Deadly
This is a crisis. Kids are handed to abusers or ripped from safe homes because evaluators play god with zero evidence. The system’s a fraud, and 2025’s outrage is boiling over on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and even LinkedIn: “#CustodyFraud, #MeTooFamilyCourt, #FamilyCourtCorruption—judges ignore abuse, evaluators cash checks.”
Science? Nope. Corruption? Yes.
What’s Next?
This is Part 1—buckle up.
Part 2 rips apart the pseudoscience—think astrology with a PhD. Part 3 unmasks the profit machine. And Part 4 exposes the $80,000 evidentiary trainwreck. This isn’t just my fight—it’s yours if you’ve got kids in court.
Sign this petition to prosecute Arnold Shienvold for misconduct.
Got a story? Drop it below or tweet #CustodyFraud—let’s make this explode.
Family court’s dirty secret is out—share this now!
Custody evaluators should always be truthful and act in the best interests of children. Sadly, all too often this is not the case. Valerie Houghton says, “My child, my rules”… “It’s not rape if they want it.” ….. “[My daughter] She’ll have fun!”
How can she say such things? My youngest son was just two years old when he was first abused. And my youngest daughter was placed into the legal custody of a man that previously drugged and raped a teen.
If a custody evaluator forces children to be sexually abused, it needs to labeled as an act of pedophilia.
Valerie Houghton says that there is nothing wrong with pedophilia. It just has a bad stigma:
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/1100356121435576577/
She also says that it is not crime: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/pin-von-valerie-houghton-lawyer-therap-auf-valerie-houghton-lawyer–1100356121435576707/
and goes on to describe a sex act with a 13 year old. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/1100356121435576741/
It all started when I told her that my ex-wife was letting a man rape my 13 year old son, so I believe that she is mocking this.