Skip to content

Legislative Conspiracy

The now-famous Blog examines legislative conspiracy in criminal racketeering of Connecticut family court, where due process suspends, allowing jewish plunder in name of best interests. So subtle, so slippery, few people recognize the deceit wielded upon ‘we the people’ by the Jewdiciary Committee of the General Assembly; the goy swindled by their own representatives.

King’s Charter of 1662 establishes the Connecticut colony, courts resemble crown courts of merry ol’ England, by 1821 a nutmeg constitution came to be, courts still reflecting English roots. Power to appoint a guardian ad litem is inherent, dating to the sixteenth century. Courts posses inherent power to tax litigants for costs to the Crown, same practice applies in Connecticut. A guardian ad litem appointed under inherent powers works for the judge, is accountable to the judge, is paid by the court, from proceeds taxed upon the litigants or from state coffers, all is well, but then something suddenly changes in 1988! After more than two centuries, the legislature singularly blesses family court with a twisted statute delegating court authority to a private attorney for the sole purpose of collecting court tax directly from litigants! Why the change? Why the improper delegation of court authority, due process violation, private collection of tax from parents? The GAL works for the court, why the direct payment from parents/litigants? The answer is racketeering and money laundering, jewish delicacies to cheat the tax man and conceal plunder from a curious public.

The court must exercise its own powers, there is constitutional requirements under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibiting a judge from abandoning these duties by appointing a private third party to collect the litigant tax.  Jews of gulag Corrupticut do not want you to know this.

Prior to 1988, a GAL is paid upon invoice approved by the appointing judge, processed by judicial branch purchasing agents, the payment made by the state is properly reported on IRS 1099, all being transparent, all recorded under state procurement regulations, all subject to public scrutiny. Then something jewish happens. PA 88-41 becomes law, providing direct payment, no state tax reporting, no auditable paper trail, just a wink and a nod from a judge to a GAL to plunder family savings, without an invoice filed with the court … brilliant jewdicial money laundering.  Cheating the taxman leaves an extra chunk of change for kickbacks to the doting jewdicial authority who assigned the lucrative appointment to a less than honorable attorney. See how the legislature is instrumental in the architecture of family plunder? Funding kickbacks? How GAL plunder is concealed from public scrutiny? Concealment being a necessity of money laundering.

Blog’s piracy department points out PA 88-41 voids the American Rule of litigation costs, where each party pays its own freight. The racketeers give the court power to tax whomever has money, to pay the legal fees of anyone in the dispute, such trickery ensures family bar rascals have access to all available funds of all litigants, no matter the wallet of their own client. Post-judgement custody fights now have guaranteed funding. As long as one party has shekels, all the lawyers will get paid, such a wonderful construction to ensure lawyer feed is provided by the doting jewdicial authority, who pockets a commission for feeding the hungry. Pointless fighting over children is the sole money maker for jews of the family bar. For the technically inclined, the criminal racketeering design can be seen in the history of CGS §46b-62. More heavy duty discussion of improper delegation of family court authority can be read here.

GAL payments are elements of racketeering and felony tax evasion, created by the legislature for jewish benefit.  Given the number of lawyers on the jewdiciary committee it is no surprise that the criminal enterprise works its way into state law.

Editor’s Note:  The improper delegation of court authority is a constitutional violation, the statute is void on its face, any persons aggrieved by paying GALs directly has cause of action against the State.  Only jews will keep up this racket in full public view.

Ask Alex Cuda, head of family bar, why there is no IRS reporting on GAL fees ordered by the jewdiciary, no auditable paper trail, no contracts, no purchasing regulations, no transparency, just ask him!

Tags: