Skip to content

Fake Family Court Police: Meet the Justice Pretenders

    Meet the Justice Pretenders—the so-called “Family Court Police” that operate with zero oversight and questionable authority. These part-time enforcers don badges from Party City, show up in mismatched uniforms, and terrify families with threats of child abduction. They operate only during business hours, moonlight as clowns by night, and claim to follow “court orders” that rarely exist. With no trauma training and six-figure taxpayer-funded salaries, they rip kids from homes under the guise of child safety. Who are they? What are their qualifications? And how do they get away with it? Let’s expose this system’s worst-kept secret.

    The Paralegal Pretenders Return: Christy Black denies Julie Holburn's claims on The Unknown Podcast. Evidence reveals Orange County questions.

    The Paralegal Pretenders Return: “Angel Law” Breaks Her Silence on Podcast, Defends Orange County Lawyer, Attacks Reporter

      Christy Black, known as “Angel Law,” broke her silence on The Unknown Podcast, defending Orange County attorney David Monarch and dismissing allegations that she posed as a paralegal. Records and messages suggest a pattern of coaching and interference in family court cases, including over 120 text messages and phone calls to a reporter during a heated custody battle. Black mocked the allegations on-air but admitted close ties with Monarch, who used the reporter’s articles against her in court. Her repeated denials, despite overwhelming evidence, fuel questions about deeper misconduct within the Orange County family court system.

      Georgia Family Court Whistleblower: Maureen Meadows reveals racial bias, GAL fraud, and a “star chamber” of secret lawyer discipline.

      Georgia Family Court Whistleblower Blows the Lid Off Secret Discipline System

        Maureen Meadows, a family law attorney turned whistleblower, says Georgia’s family court system is “rigged” to protect big law partners and crush parents. Her divorce exposed fake reports, false statements, and a “star chamber” of secret lawyer discipline. “They lied and got away with it,” she said. David Weigel, founder of the Family Court Fraud Warrior Project, says legal fiduciaries get a free pass while Wall Street fiduciaries face constant scrutiny. “It’s astounding,” Weigel said. Meadows wants federal oversight, warning: “If they can do this to me, imagine what they’re doing to parents who can’t fight back.”

        Post Malone’s Legal Encore: How Filing First in Utah Could Swing the Custody Battle

          Post Malone’s custody battle has shifted to Utah, giving him an early advantage. Malone filed for primary custody in Utah just before his ex-fiancée, Hee Sung “Jamie” Park, filed in California. Under the UCCJEA, the child’s home state usually dictates jurisdiction. Malone argues that Utah is the child’s home state, leveraging his property and the child’s alleged primary residence there. Park claims California is home now. For Malone, winning jurisdiction in Utah could mean lower child support payments and better odds for primary custody. Filing first may prove decisive as this legal showdown unfolds.

          My Three Minutes Campaign: Parents post powerful 3-minute videos exposing family court abuse in viral campaign aimed at DOJ and DOGE.

          MY THREE MINUTES CAMPAIGN BLOWS THE ROOF OFF FAMILY COURT CORRUPTION

            The “My Three Minutes” campaign is exploding across social media, led by the Family Court Fraud Warrior Project. Parents from coast to coast are picking up their phones and posting short, powerful videos exposing corruption, abuse, and retaliation inside America’s family courts. From forced gag orders to unlawful child removals, these raw testimonies are building a blockchain-style archive of systemic fraud. Project founder David Weigel says the goal is simple: collect 1,000 verified stories and blast them in front of DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s office. This isn’t protest—it’s data. And it’s becoming impossible to ignore.

            Joseph A. Scallan III

            ROBOT DOG DADDY: DHS Official Joseph Scallan Defends Sex with Machines, Dodges Family Court Truths

              In a case that sounds more like science fiction than family law, DHS official Joseph A. Scallan III—who once argued that sex with robot dogs isn’t bestiality—is now being handed custody of his traumatized children by the D.C. Family Court. Despite medical proof of traumatic brain injury and abuse verified by renowned neurologist Dr. S. Gregory Hipskind, the court slashed Scallan’s child support to $75 and ordered “reunification.” Behind him are rookie guardians ad litem from Jones Day LLP. Advocates say the court is ignoring science, enabling abuse, and punishing the protective mother. This isn’t justice. It’s a federal disgrace.

              Arizona's Family Court Scandal: Gov. Hobbs vetoes HB 2256, sparking outrage over family court-ordered abuse. Critics call it "sadism."

              ARIZONA’S FAMILY COURT SCANDAL

                Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs is under fire for vetoing a bill that aimed to protect children from court-ordered abuse disguised as “therapy.” HB 2256, amended by Senator Mark Finchem and sponsored by Representative Rachel Keshel, would have barred courts from forcing families to pay for controversial reunification programs without consent. Critics accuse Hobbs of siding with court-connected profiteers over traumatized children. “This decision protects the profit motive and self-dealing,” said Finchem. Advocates say the veto enables financial extortion and shields unlicensed actors preying on broken families. Jill Jones Soderman called Hobbs “a sadist” for enabling abuse under the guise of justice.

                PAYWALL OF JUSTICE: ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

                  After stonewalling for nearly a year, the Orange County Superior Court (OCSC) has hit investigative journalist Julie M. Anderson Holburn with a stunning $4,240 fee for a single public records report. The court’s months-long delays, bogus legal excuses, false retention claims, and personal attacks reveal a disturbing pattern: deny, deflect, retaliate. Holburn’s requests—clearly protected under California Rule of Court 10.500—seek basic family court administrative data already available on courthouse terminals. But instead of compliance, OCSC has chosen obfuscation. At stake is not just transparency, but the constitutional right of every Californian to know what their courts are doing.

                  Boyne Strikes Back: Accuses CT of censorship, illegal raids, ADA abuse, and jurisdiction fraud in a landmark First Amendment battle.

                  BOYNE STRIKES BACK: IS JACK ON CRACK OR JUST PLAIN WHACK?

                    Paul Boyne is no longer just defending himself—he’s going to war. After 18 months in jail for incendiary blog posts targeting Connecticut judges, the controversial former FamilyCourtCircus.com publisher appeared on The Unknown Podcast to lay out what he calls “a federal case against the State of Connecticut.” From unconstitutional speech charges to illegal property seizures, from ADA violations to extradition fraud, Boyne names names: Jack Doyle, Joette Katz, Samantha McCord, and even Gov. Ned Lamont. Boyne demands justice. “This isn’t law,” he said. “It’s control. And it’s time for them to pay.”

                    Ding Dong Dead Moskowitz: Her death reignites debate over GAL immunity, judicial overreach, and Connecticut’s broken family court system.

                    Ding Dong Dead Moskowitz

                      The death of Emily J. Moskowitz has reignited fierce debate over Connecticut’s family court system. Known both as a veteran attorney and a controversial guardian ad litem, Moskowitz was praised by the judiciary for her service and simultaneously condemned by critics as a symbol of unchecked power and judicial overreach. Central to this storm is the landmark Carrubba v. Moskowitz decision, which granted GALs absolute immunity—a legal shield that many argue enables abuse, corruption, and financial exploitation of families in crisis. As praise and scorn pour in, the battle over Moskowitz’s legacy continues to stir outrage and reflection across Connecticut.

                      Arizona Family Court Under Fire: Arizona parents expose family court corruption. HB 2256 targets forced therapy and judicial abuse.

                      ARIZONA FAMILY COURT UNDER FIRE

                        Arizona’s family court system is facing unprecedented scrutiny after more than 400 parents, grandparents, and advocates testified before a legislative committee on April 14, 2025. The hearing exposed a disturbing pattern of judicial overreach, financial exploitation, and the forced use of costly therapeutic interventions—often imposed without evidence or due process. Testimonies revealed families bankrupted, children traumatized, and a court system enabling profiteering under the guise of therapy. Lawmakers responded with HB 2256, aiming to rein in these abuses and restore parental rights. With more hearings ahead, Arizona may become the first state to blow the lid off court-ordered “therapy trafficking.”

                        CENSORED FOR SPEAKING OUT: OCDA Deleted Public Comments During Its Own Crime Victims Rights Ceremony

                          Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer hosted a livestreamed Crime Victims Rights Week ceremony on April 29, 2025, promising a platform for survivors. But when a journalist submitted peaceful, on-topic comments demanding accountability for CPS, family court, and law enforcement failures, moderators deleted the posts mid-broadcast. The event—billed as a public forum for victim voices—became a textbook case of viewpoint discrimination. The censorship violated First Amendment protections affirmed in Lindke v. Freed and sparked public outcry. A CPRA request and formal media inquiry are now pending. Over 13,000 have signed a petition demanding full investigation of Orange County family courts.

                          Parental Religious Opt-Outs: Mahmoud v. Taylor and the Battle Over Books, Rights, and Belief in America’s Schools

                            A legal firestorm is brewing in Mahmoud v. Taylor, now before the U.S. Supreme Court. At stake: the right of parents to shield their children from public school lessons that clash with religious beliefs. What began as a dispute over LGBTQ+ storybooks in Maryland has exploded into a national fight over the First Amendment, diversity in education, and parental control. As the Court weighs whether public schools can deny opt-out requests, the decision could ripple across classrooms from coast to coast. It’s a defining moment in the clash between faith and curriculum—and the next landmark in America’s culture war.

                            The New Jersey Devil: Diane Womer blames journalist Richard Luthmann for exposing corruption in NJ Family Court.

                            THE NEW JERSEY DEVIL IN THE COURTROOM?

                              In a fiery moment inside Sussex County Family Court, Diane Womer, head of Family Matters of Morris County, branded journalist Richard Luthmann “the devil.” Her accusation came not in defense of a child’s safety—but in frustration over Luthmann’s growing exposés targeting the shady underside of New Jersey’s family court. From TheFamilyCourtCircus.com to The Unknown Podcast, Luthmann and co-host Michael Volpe are ripping the lid off corruption, favoritism, and profiteering in court-appointed supervision schemes. As public outrage builds and reform efforts mount, insiders like Womer—who wine and dine judges while cashing in on forced visitation—are seeing their empire threatened.

                              Judge Michael L. Ravin

                              THE COURTROOM CON: MONICA CIARDI’S SENTENCING EXPOSES NJ’S CORRUPT MACHINE

                                Protective mother Monica Ciardi faces sentencing today in Essex County, NJ, despite no confirmed indictment, no allocution of rights, and no proof she knowingly waived her parental and First Amendment rights. Her felony plea deal—negotiated under pressure, without due process—includes a gag order and opens the door for permanent separation from her children. Critics call it a state-sanctioned shakedown led by corrupt Morris and Essex County officials. With federal eyes now on the case, pressure mounts on Judge Michael L. Ravin to stop what legal advocates say is a court-run extortion racket against a protective mom who refused to stay quiet.

                                Brain Scans Reveal Abuse: Oregon DHS ignores scientific evidence, punishing protective mother Martina Flanigan while endangering her children.

                                Brain Scans Reveal Abuse—Oregon DHS Turns Blind Eye

                                  What may be a flashpoint case has gripped Oregon. The Amen Clinic’s SPECT imaging revealed traumatic brain injuries in Martina Flanigan’s children—evidence pointing to severe abuse. Despite this, Oregon’s Department of Human Services (DHS) and Family Court have dismissed the scientific findings, targeting Flanigan for her advocacy. Protective mothers and their families face retaliation, while abusers remain shielded. This case underscores a systemic failure where science is sidelined, and children’s safety is compromised. The question remains: when will Oregon prioritize the well-being of its most vulnerable over bureaucratic denial and institutional inertia?

                                  Family Court Civil War: A Guns N’ Roses anthem, a father’s custody fight, revealing the emotional wreckage of America’s family court system.

                                  Family Court Civil War: How One Guns N’ Roses Song Became the Soundtrack to My Fight for Fatherhood

                                    When Michael R. Phillips heard Guns N’ Roses’ Civil War, it didn’t just echo in his ears—it echoed his life. In the lyrics, he found a haunting mirror of his custody battle: the confusion, the emotional wreckage, and the systemic injustice. Family court, he says, isn’t a place of resolution—it’s a war zone dressed in robes. His battle isn’t over territory, but over time with his son. This isn’t just his war. It’s a national tragedy played out in courtrooms every day. And for him, Civil War isn’t a song—it’s a siren screaming for justice.

                                    Family Court Injustice: One father’s heartbreaking journey from six-figure success to food stamps, his child, rights, and future robbed.

                                    Family Court Injustice: Robbing Peter to Pay Paul

                                      Michael Phillips is the founder of Father & Co., a parental rights advocate, and a self-represented father fighting through the American family court system. With firsthand experience of parental alienation, legal injustice, and financial devastation, Michael writes to expose the truth, empower erased parents, and demand systemic reform. His work blends legal insight with raw emotional truth, giving voice to those silenced by a broken system.