First Amendment

Bergen NJ Banana Republic: Dr. Bandy Lee challenges the family court cartel, backed by Lawyer Bruce Fein, Dave Weigel, and reform advocates.

Bergen NJ Banana Republic: Bandy Lee vs. the Family Court Cartel

In Hackensack, a courtroom erupted as Dr. Bandy X. Lee, Yale- and Harvard-trained forensic psychiatrist, stood pro se against Judge Jane Gallina-Mecca’s gag order. With Guardian ad Litem Evelyn Nissirios accused of running a “child slave trade,” the fight was no ordinary custody squabble. Legendary constitutional attorney Bruce Fein watched from the gallery, while activist Dave Weigel and his Family Court Fraud Warriors broadcast the spectacle. Dozens of reform advocates filled the room, demanding justice. Dr. Lee’s stand against judicial corruption isn’t just about Bergen County—it’s a battle for the Constitution, family integrity, and America’s soul.

Assassinations

The assassination of Charlie Kirk represents the ultimate form of lawless silencing. But political violence isn’t limited to a bullet from a rooftop sniper — it can also come cloaked in a judge’s robe. Judge David Gold’s arrest warrant against a political blogger shows the same contempt for the Constitution, using state power to muzzle dissent. Free speech, due process, and the rule of law fall victim to ideological zealotry. Whether enforced by rifle or gavel, the message is the same: speak against the establishment, and you’ll be punished. America faces an existential battle for its founding freedoms.

Timely Fashion

Connecticut’s criminal justice circus has collapsed into the absurd. Judge Peter Brown, instead of addressing constitutional violations, now demands legal arguments over the meaning of “timely fashion.” Prosecutor Jack Doyle, earning $215,000 a year, can’t even file charges in the correct district, yet insists due process rights simply “expire.” Brown, described by critics as a “trained ape for his masters,” repeatedly refuses to specify the supposed criminal speech at issue. Protected political expression is rebranded as “stalking,” and the judiciary plays along. The case now hinges on semantics, not law—proof of a judiciary independent of justice itself.

Boyne’s Connecticut Justice Fraud

Connecticut blogger and journalist Paul Boyne has become the unlikely face of America’s First Amendment fight. Prosecutor Jack Doyle’s two-page gag motion to muzzle Boyne ignited a firestorm, barring him from publishing his own discovery. On The Unknown Podcast, Richard Luthmann and Michael Volpe shredded the move as unconstitutional overreach. Boyne accused Governor Ned Lamont’s agents of staging an illegal raid and claimed ex-Justice Joette Katz secretly pulled strings. His lawyer, Todd Bussert, offered only a half-hearted fight. Boyne calls it “pretend justice” — a system that tramples speech and proves Connecticut no longer honors the First Amendment.

Pretend Justice Exposed

Connecticut’s so-called “justice system” is rotting from within, and Jack Doyle is Exhibit A. Paid $215,000 a year, the New Haven State’s Attorney pretends to be a prosecutor, pretends to be a lawyer, pretends to honor the Constitution—but in reality, he’s a puppet for political bosses and outside agendas. Critics say Doyle has weaponized the courts to muzzle speech, crush dissent, and protect the powerful. From illegal warrants to gag orders, from family court tyranny to free press crackdowns, Doyle plays the role of sovereign protector while trampling the very rights he swore to uphold.

Prosecutor Jackaz’s Gag Motion: CT prosecutor Jack Doyle seeks to gag journalist Paul Boyne in a shocking free speech case, igniting outrage.

Prosecutor Jackaz’s Gag Motion Ignites Constitutional Firestorm

State Attorney John “Jack” Doyle’s August 22 motion against journalist Paul Boyne has set off a constitutional firestorm. Doyle wants to ban Boyne from possessing or sharing discovery—even redacted—with the press. Critics call it an unprecedented gag that shreds the First Amendment. Boyne, once editor of The Family Court Circus, labels Doyle “Jackaz” and accuses him of covering up judicial corruption. Even Connecticut’s own constitution promises citizens the right to “freely speak, write and publish.” Now Doyle’s bid to silence Boyne has become a national litmus test: can America tolerate unpopular voices, or will Connecticut muzzle them?

Bigger Bitch Susan Bassi? Luthmann wonders whether the California Reporter is a bigger bitch than Kyle's mom on South Park after Holburn snub.

Bigger Bitch Susan Bassi? Bigger Than Kyle’s Mom?

A no-holds-barred media war has erupted between California’s Susan Bassi and Florida “tough guy” journalist Richard Luthmann. The flashpoint: Bassi’s refusal to cover Julie Holburn’s harrowing family court abuse case, despite years of following it and viewing raw evidence. Luthmann accuses Bassi of hypocrisy, DARVO tactics, and being compromised by Chinese Communist Party-linked TikTok funding. Bassi fired back, attacking Luthmann’s ethics and dismissing his journalism. Luthmann responded with a formal Florida Statute 770.01 litigation notice, daring her to set foot in Florida. The feud has gone public — and personal — with reputations, credibility, and serious corruption allegations all on the line.

Elmo Decries Jewish Conspiracy

Elmo’s latest outburst has PBS and the First Amendment under siege. After the federal government slashed public broadcasting funds, the beloved red muppet snapped—launching into a bizarre rant on “Elmo’s World” about censorship, corporate influence, and political corruption. Authorities responded with overwhelming force: a SWAT raid on Sesame Street, sealed warrants, and cries of “domestic muppet extremism.” Puppets were detained, trash cans overturned, and cookies confiscated. Critics say it’s a chilling escalation of free speech suppression. Muppet veterans Statler and Waldorf called it “the worst show we’ve ever seen.” Satire or serious overreach? You decide.

First Amendment Allergic Reaction: Judges in the Mist

In Connecticut’s twisted judicial theater, Judge Peter L. Brown nearly choked on the First Amendment—triggered by blog posts and Joette Katz’s authoritarian musings. The blog that drives judges mad, The Family Court Circus, has long skewered Katz, a former justice turned censor-in-chief. Her 2022 op-ed, “When Is Enough Enough?”, drew fire for labeling satire as criminal “threats.” Now, a courtroom transcript reveals Judge Brown’s allergic meltdown over the blog’s political speech, exposing the fragile egos and coordinated efforts of Katz, Gold, Bozzuto, and their DEI-infused judicial gang to weaponize the courts against free expression. The First Amendment’s enemies wear robes.

Crooked GAL Evelyn Nissirios tries to sanction Dr. Bandy X. Lee for exposing family court abuse — and triggers national backlash.

Crooked GAL Evelyn Nissirios: Who Does She Think She Is?

Crooked New Jersey guardian ad litem Evelyn Nissirios just made the mistake of picking a fight with world-renowned psychiatrist Dr. Bandy X. Lee—and it’s backfiring spectacularly. In an unhinged motion, Nissirios demanded federal sanctions against Dr. Lee and her legendary attorney Bruce Fein for exposing family court corruption. But Nissirios’s ignorance of constitutional law—and apparent unfamiliarity with both Kafka and Fein—only exposed the GAL racket she thrives in. Dr. Lee’s lawsuit has sparked national outrage, with activists calling for the impeachment of Judge Jane Gallina-Mecca and sweeping family court reform. “Who does she think she is?” America’s about to answer.

Judicial Speech Police

In the People’s Republic of Connecticut, free speech now comes with a security review. A shadowy branch within the judiciary—led by DEI apparatchiks like Chief Justice Raheem Mullins and Marshal Services Director O’Donovan Murphy—has redefined citizen dissent as “threats” against judges. Under the guise of “judicial security,” the state now spies on political speech, targeting bloggers and critics with an unaccountable Office of Protective Intelligence. But where are the arrests, prosecutions, or public threat definitions? Nowhere. The speech police are here, cloaked in robes and race-baiting rhetoric, declaring war on the First Amendment—because the judiciary can’t take the heat.

Ned Lamont Under Pressure: Paul Boyne exposes illegal raids, unconstitutional laws, and judicial bias in a landmark free speech battle.

NED LAMONT UNDER PRESSURE: BOYNE DROPS BOMBSHELLS ON THE UNKNOWN PODCAST

On The Unknown Podcast, Paul Boyne delivered a thunderous rebuke of Connecticut’s political and judicial elite. With hosts Richard Luthmann and Michael Volpe, Boyne detailed his civil and criminal battles against Governor Ned Lamont, exposing illegal extradition, stolen evidence, and judicial corruption. He accused state actors of violating the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, breaching the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, and suppressing constitutionally protected speech through an unconstitutional “stalking speech” law. From the Silver Platter Doctrine to Joette Katz’s behind-the-scenes influence, this episode is a masterclass in how state power can be abused to silence political dissent.

Family Court's Star Chamber: Dr. Bandy Lee sues NJ Judge over unconstitutional gag orders and judicial abuse exposing systemic corruption.

FAMILY COURT’S STAR CHAMBER: BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Dr. Bandy X. Lee, a former Yale professor and Harvard-trained forensic psychiatrist, is taking on the heart of judicial darkness in Bergen County, New Jersey. In a blistering federal lawsuit, Dr. Lee accuses Chief Judge Jane Gallina-Mecca, GAL Evelyn Nissirios, and Judge Michael Antoniewicz of weaponizing gag orders to silence her First Amendment-protected speech. With over 2,500 signatures on an impeachment petition and constitutional scholar Bruce Fein representing her in federal court, Dr. Lee’s battle is drawing national attention. “They may have gagged me in court,” she said, “but they will never silence the truth.”

Boyne Strikes Back: Accuses CT of censorship, illegal raids, ADA abuse, and jurisdiction fraud in a landmark First Amendment battle.

BOYNE STRIKES BACK: IS JACK ON CRACK OR JUST PLAIN WHACK?

Paul Boyne is no longer just defending himself—he’s going to war. After 18 months in jail for incendiary blog posts targeting Connecticut judges, the controversial former FamilyCourtCircus.com publisher appeared on The Unknown Podcast to lay out what he calls “a federal case against the State of Connecticut.” From unconstitutional speech charges to illegal property seizures, from ADA violations to extradition fraud, Boyne names names: Jack Doyle, Joette Katz, Samantha McCord, and even Gov. Ned Lamont. Boyne demands justice. “This isn’t law,” he said. “It’s control. And it’s time for them to pay.”

CENSORED FOR SPEAKING OUT: OCDA Deleted Public Comments During Its Own Crime Victims Rights Ceremony

Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer hosted a livestreamed Crime Victims Rights Week ceremony on April 29, 2025, promising a platform for survivors. But when a journalist submitted peaceful, on-topic comments demanding accountability for CPS, family court, and law enforcement failures, moderators deleted the posts mid-broadcast. The event—billed as a public forum for victim voices—became a textbook case of viewpoint discrimination. The censorship violated First Amendment protections affirmed in Lindke v. Freed and sparked public outcry. A CPRA request and formal media inquiry are now pending. Over 13,000 have signed a petition demanding full investigation of Orange County family courts.

The New Jersey Devil: Diane Womer blames journalist Richard Luthmann for exposing corruption in NJ Family Court.

THE NEW JERSEY DEVIL IN THE COURTROOM?

In a fiery moment inside Sussex County Family Court, Diane Womer, head of Family Matters of Morris County, branded journalist Richard Luthmann “the devil.” Her accusation came not in defense of a child’s safety—but in frustration over Luthmann’s growing exposés targeting the shady underside of New Jersey’s family court. From TheFamilyCourtCircus.com to The Unknown Podcast, Luthmann and co-host Michael Volpe are ripping the lid off corruption, favoritism, and profiteering in court-appointed supervision schemes. As public outrage builds and reform efforts mount, insiders like Womer—who wine and dine judges while cashing in on forced visitation—are seeing their empire threatened.

THE COURTROOM CON: MONICA CIARDI’S SENTENCING EXPOSES NJ’S CORRUPT MACHINE

Protective mother Monica Ciardi faces sentencing today in Essex County, NJ, despite no confirmed indictment, no allocution of rights, and no proof she knowingly waived her parental and First Amendment rights. Her felony plea deal—negotiated under pressure, without due process—includes a gag order and opens the door for permanent separation from her children. Critics call it a state-sanctioned shakedown led by corrupt Morris and Essex County officials. With federal eyes now on the case, pressure mounts on Judge Michael L. Ravin to stop what legal advocates say is a court-run extortion racket against a protective mom who refused to stay quiet.