Family Court’s Billion-Dollar Bias Exposed—Truth Scorches Through Feminist Fantasy.
By Richard Luthmann
“Dear Mr. Luthmann”: A Chant Meets Cold Facts
Some self‑styled “Witches” came swinging with charm and statistics about Family Court funding and the Violence Against Women Act. On October 14, they left this comment to the article Family Court Free Press Showdown: Wall Street Dad and Firebrand Journo Expose “Treason” in the System:
Dear Mr. Luthmann,
What the witches would like is more than a sliver of the truth. The attack on the violence against women’s act. Despite the name also protects men who are victims. VAWA covers services for victims of domestic violence , dating violence ,sexual assault, stalking , including housing protection , legal protections, and funding for victims assistance programs.
Provide funding for services like rape crisis centers and hotlines.
Support community based violence prevention programs
Campus initiatives
under served populations
Offer legal aid to survivors$690 Million dollars in the United states in2024 . Vawa a gender neutral law. According to on line data 15.5 million children witness domestic violence . 4.4 million referrals to Cps in 2023. 52.2% were screened out without a full investigation. 546,159 were identified as victims 2,000 children fatalities . undetermined is unknown. Since 1993 to 2023 67 % of sexual abuse substantiations have declined . Physical abuse substantiations declined 63% . The number of deaths due to maltreatment and neglect has increased. Attributed to change in investigation methods and reporting. There is an increase in parental alienation claims through out the court house particularly in custody deputes. Attacking funding only creating a lack of resources to domestic abuse victims.
Parental Alienation claims disproportionately target women/mothers reflecting deeply ingrained bias about women, motherhood and caregiving roles. Battered Women’s support services Jan 31,2025. Mother’s are more likely to report concerns in good faith, even if those concerns are later unsubstantiated due lack of evidence and reform groups wish to have them arrested for it . Despite 52.2% are not fully investigated. The Gals appear to be interfering in investigations. As well as obstructions in investigations. Parental Alienation is now being recoined as Parent- Child contact problems . Once again forces reunification under any condition. Causing years of court ordered services and insisting on contact even in abusive conditions. These are 30 percent of cases and “high conflict ” is just the gateway for these “alienation ” industry professionals to latch onto a cases.
The court professionals are what Mr. Weigel is complaining about , but he and his associates from the shared parenting and alienation community continue to go after funding that helps women and some men with less financial resources to escape. Promote laws and punishments that will stop some parents and children from getting out of abusive situations.
Surviving comes at a cost. It’s not all monetary. Taking away funding from one group and giving advantage to another doesn’t seem to fix the problem. Unhealthy power dynamics don’t fix the problem and is not the same as exposing the real problems. Telling the truth and not knowing things can happen all at the same time .
Let’s strip the spin.
VAWA’s intentions are noble. It funds crisis lines, shelters, and prosecutions.
But the implementation is broken. The funding architecture warps outcomes. The grants reward findings, training, and process, not truth.
In that world, allegations become currency. And courts become cash registers with gavels.
My beefs are disciplined and specific. VAWA has been co‑opted by a gendered narrative and a hungry bureaucracy. The facts back me up.
VAWA Witches Brew: Follow the Money Feeding the Court Machine
First, the money. DOJ announced “more than $690 million in Violence Against Women Act funding” in 2024. Senate appropriators peacocked “$713 million, the highest funding level ever” for the Office on Violence Against Women that year. This is not chump change. It is a river. The witches’ $690 million boast is real. The tap is wide open.
Second, where it goes. One marquee program is STOP. The DOJ says each state “must allocate … 5 percent to state and local courts.” In 2024, OVW reported 56 STOP awards totaling $171.2 million. That is a carved slice for courts on top of law enforcement, prosecutors, and victim services. Another program, the ICJR grant, explicitly “assists state, local, and Tribal governments, and courts to improve the criminal justice response.” You can argue over outcomes. You cannot deny the architecture: VAWA funds the courts.
Third, how courts use it. The National Center for State Courts surveyed how VAWA STOP money gets spent. After Congress changed the law in 2013 from funds “for” courts to funds “to” courts, most states reported they now receive the full five‑percent set‑aside. The most common use is training judges and court staff on domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. The structure is deliberate. It feeds court systems and their vendors. It grows a professional class that thrives on continuing controversy. Luthmann’s jab lands: “Every ‘custody decision’ comes with a ledger entry.” Incentives shape outcomes.
If you want to see the bias bleed through, look at who gets served. The official VAWA report to Congress says “about 1 in 10” victims served was male: 9% in discretionary programs, 13% in STOP, 11% in SASP. The law reads gender‑neutral. The implementation tilts. That is not a culture war. That is the government’s own chart.
VAWA Witches Brew: The Narrative Weapon – How Allegations Become Leverage
The witches say reformers are cruel to mothers. They claim “parental alienation” is a cudgel against women. They cite advocates who argue it “punish[es] survivors and endanger[s] children.” They note professionals now rebrand it as “parent‑child contact problems.” There is truth here. Abusers sometimes flip the script. Bad actors cry “alienation” to bury violence. No serious reformer denies that tactic.
But the opposite tactic exists and thrives. Family lawyers call it the “Silver Bullet.” One legal analysis puts it plainly: false abuse allegations have become a strategic litigation tool. In high‑conflict cases, a single claim triggers protective orders, excludes a parent from home and children, and flips leverage overnight. Psychiatric Times found estimates of false allegations in cases involving children range from 2% to 35%. Even a small percentage in a huge system is devastating. These are not fringe blogs. They are mainstream observers describing courtroom reality.
Add process to narrative. Many states issue temporary restraining orders ex parte on short timelines. Scholars have warned for years that easing access can ease abuse of the process. Texas reviewed protective orders in 2024 and underscored the low, fast threshold for temporary relief. None of this says don’t protect victims. It says protect due process too. Because in family court, process decides where a child sleeps tonight. The witches gloss over that risk. Reformers do not. They live it.
Here is the link to VAWA. The more training, lingo, and grant‑funded “services,” the more value a case has when framed as domestic violence. That does not mean survivors lie. It means a system pays premiums for a specific narrative. In that system, good people get help. And bad actors get leverage. VAWA’s implementation makes both outcomes more likely.
VAWA Witches Brew: Fix Courts, Not People – Two Jobs, Then Go Home
The prescription is blunt. Keep family courts to two tasks: property determinations and custody determinations. Don’t try to fix people. I see court‑ordered “services” for what they often are: revenue lines for insiders.
The machine doesn’t care about your child’s stability—it cares that your case stays open and that the revolving door of ‘services’ keeps spinning. That should chill every parent. It sure chills me.
VAWA’s noble goals cannot mask ugly results. Even after reauthorization, tragedies forced Congress to tack on Kayden’s Law to clamp down on lethal custody errors. The Biden White House celebrated the 2022 reauthorization. Advocates explain Kayden’s Law “incentivizes” states to overhaul custody laws to protect at‑risk kids.
It took a murder to get reform language. That is not victory. That is an indictment. More rules and more money came after courts failed a little girl. A federal act cannot save children if courtrooms stay unaccountable.
So here is my rebuttal, straight. VAWA is well‑intentioned. Its implementation is terrible. It has been co‑opted by a gendered lens and a bureaucracy with bills to pay. DOJ sprays hundreds of millions every year. STOP sets aside cash “to” courts. Consultants, GALs, evaluators, and training mills thrive. Families do not.
Judges aren’t Solomon. They’re accountants with gavels. That line stings because it rings true. The fix is not more therapy orders and forced reunifications. The fix is less court social engineering.
Decide property. Decide custody. Then let families heal without a meter running.
The Family Court system doesn’t need more civility. It needs fire. Burn the perverse incentives. Leave the truth.
To the Witches: You love victims. But love demands accountability. Funding without guardrails buys mythology and mission creep. The witches offered a spell. The numbers broke it. Now let’s fix the courts and stop pretending the machine is mercy.
Please define toxic feminist? Failure to be seen as equal value despite their contributions. Engaged in the work force. Declined employment after covid due to the elimination of jobs. The government and men’s rights groups demand they work yet are receiving a lesser income. Women often perform child care role and when they file for divorce they are being stripped of their roles. While the sexist judge in New York insists on keeping the status in communities of a religion. This is all BS and I am going to continue to point it out for what it is. I’ve listened to the conversation on parental alienation and it relentless targeting women. The state of Connecticut is the hot bed. Millions in donations from men to universities to continue to dominate the convention. Pushing for 50/50 legislation and I don’t want to pay child support. Toxic feminist is all the rage and more ” buzz words” . From a group of men who 64% of the time run out and grab a new appliances. Then engage them in custody disputes. Round social media to profess themselves as bonus Mom. Who is the new and improved dishwasher. ” Bringing awareness of toxic women” to the public. Meanwhile 70 percent of batters are gaining access to children. The state promotes them as a ” health care crisis”. Gaining federal funding to keep them out of jail. While triangulation of laws are promoted. This has absolutely nothing to do with children welfare. It’s all about targeting women who are bringing awareness of the on going domestic batters and the legal playbook they engage in. . If you want to expose the family court system it’s time to expose the players in the game. Many of the equal and shared parenting leaders and their flying monkey. These are men’s rights groups trying to silence women. Never have a kind word to say about them. Unless they promote parental alienation and splitting custody. Best interest standards should be applied to an individual case not on over fudged facts and questionable psychology. Alienation industry expert claim when a child rejects a parent they have been alienated their children have been alienated. Ruby Frank children ran away, 11 year old Jacqueline was reported to run away twice. How many times did the Ambrose children run away? 6 children high tailed it to Florida. Connecticut is ground zero for a bunch of wizards controlling the court system. It’ s not the witches. The system doesn’t want reunification. It’s the parents and the industry making money off it.
Ok. So you’re saying this Nutmeg bunch all grew dicks:
With all do respect, these types of comments are why no one get’s any where. These are women who happen to work in the state of Connecticut legal system, and placed on the bench by elected individuals. Let’s not forget they are employees of a judicial branch who’s funding is attached to the gender bias agreement. Criminal justice reform, a program based overwhelmingly for individuals with an extra appendage. The court system should not be held responsible for fixing relationships destroyed by bad behavior. Neither should the other parent. The problem is what came first the cart or the horse? I can feel for parents who have lost their children. Some of these situations are unjustified and some are not. Here is where the problem lies. These court professionals. The political are driving the bus , who puts the gas in the bus. Is the bus being driven for the benefit for the people? Children are people too. Has the definition of malicious alienator been defined by a group of people who rails against abuse? The GAL forced to retire had nothing to do with a father and daughter. It had everything to do with a protective mother and her son. Some of us know better. Re-writing history doesn’t add sunlight or clean up family court.
With all due respect, this is exactly the kind of institutional gaslighting that keeps family court corruption buried under a mountain of polite excuses. You say these judges “happen to be women,” as if gender shields them from criticism. It doesn’t. When they wield the gavel to destroy families under the banner of “judicial discretion,” it’s not feminism—it’s tyranny in heels.
The “gender bias agreement” isn’t a shield, it’s a subsidy for bias. The judiciary isn’t fixing relationships; it’s monetizing their destruction. You ask who fuels the bus? It’s taxpayers. You ask who’s driving it? Bureaucrats, lawyers, and lobbyists whose careers depend on the chaos.
You talk about rewriting history. I’m talking about reading the record—thousands of cases where due process was optional, children were trafficked through court orders, and parents were financially bled dry. Family court isn’t misunderstood; it’s malfunctioning by design.
If sunlight is the best disinfectant, then let’s stop handing out sunglasses to the guilty.
You posted all female judges. You haven’t posted anything males under this article. When I spoke about rewriting history it was based on the statement made by a self proclaimed professional who made the statement. Paul Boyne already wrote about the case in another blog. What is gas lighting? Gas lighting is hidding funding that is being abused. Using fudged facts and statistics to get a leg up in the system. No one is fudging dv funding. The number of substanctated cases of it. What is gas lighting is having a GaL call the prosecutor office to have charges dropped. Avoiding an investigation into the facts. What is gaslighting is not allowing due process in criminal court to drop crime statistics. What is gaslighting is coming up with strategic planning to prioritize fatherhood over criminal matters. What is gaslighting is telling mothers they are alienated and then promoting the children are better off with their fathers. If you are attempting to disinfect the court it should be based on all the facts of cases. Either you want to shed sunlight or place valuable facts in the shade. It’s gaslighting when a 503c nonprofit organization based on the gender of a parent as an employee of the judicial branch. Pretend is a minority community problem. Selling to the middle class they are targeted for child support when many well off fathers are not paying it. Promting amoungust a group that ” gifts and prizes” are the reason women file for divorce. And use men who abuse the system for DV restraining order and food stamps. While many who need them are starved into abusive relationships. These are complex social issues. We can agree that there are serious curruption in the government and court house. Gaslighting is when you only report on what you want people to know. Vowa is abused you say. But the fatherhood initiative employing several HHS employees is above board and not being misused? Equal and shared parenting at Uconn and Uconn kids is running studies that capture the high conflict co parenting problems? Assistance for DV is not the problem it’s the state employees and government running a complete lack of investigation. Placing sun light on one side and pulling a window shade down on another is not fixing family court. The fatherhood is funded by the government and donations. It’s run by men’s rights groups. It’s a significant part of the problem. People are continuing to hide it. Despite evidence something is not right with it. The people who keep twisting it.
You just wrote 500 words accusing me of gaslighting while performing the rhetorical equivalent of a hostage video for the Fatherhood Initiative.
Let’s clear a few things up.
First, I didn’t “post all female judges” because of gender. I posted corruption, and those judges just happened to come with ovaries attached. I’ll gladly post any male judge caught doing the same thing—send me names. Here’s a good place to start:
https://familycourtfraudwarrior.com/judicial-wall-of-shame
Second, your definition of gaslighting sounds like something between a Facebook rant and a grant proposal. Gaslighting isn’t “hiding funding” or “not liking my blog.” It’s when institutions make you question observable reality—like saying due process exists while prosecutors and GALs play phone tag to make cases vanish.
Third, dragging Paul Boyne into this as cover is weak. Quoting him doesn’t make your logic stronger—it just makes your argument look outsourced.
You accuse me of “placing sunlight on one side.” Wrong. I’m shining it everywhere—on VAWA abuse, fatherhood funding fraud, judicial misconduct, and anyone who cashes a government check to pretend they’re fixing families. The problem isn’t that I’m selective; it’s that too many of you are allergic to full-spectrum light.
If you want to debate corruption, fine. But don’t cloak ideological spin in moral outrage. You don’t disinfect a system by whining about the gender ratio of who gets exposed. You fix it by dragging every roach—male or female—into the light and letting the public watch them scurry.
Now that’s how sunlight works.
For the record the gender bias agreement was never inacted to fix bias. The fatherhood initiative was started to get father’s to take responsibility for their children. Financially, instead of burdening the tax payer. It’s was meant to teach them to engage with their children in a healthy way. Engage with the mothers in a responsible way. The fatherhood initiative was never meant to get father’s out of criminal charges. It was not meant to gender profile mothers as gatekeeper, malicious alienator or gold diggers. This is the abusive use of the fatherhood initiative to that equal and shared parenting groups have done with it. Using fudged facts and statistics to dominate the family court house. It’s manipulated judicial education. Hijacked legislation, the perception of women in family court. If we are to discuss accountability I’m going to hold the leader of family court responsible as well as the ” Alienation industry expert” for their actions and conduct that has lead to the abuse of the fatherhood initiative. First enacted in the state of Connecticut. The judiciary committee who refuses to ensure that it’s not being abused for further federal funding to the health and human services departments through out the state. As well as the head of family services married to the woman who runs the fatherhood initiative at Uconn. The abuse of the program labeling ministry women as welfare queens apon it’s enactments. White women as privileged. Allowing unbroken down statistics to be used as a weapon in their judicial branch. If woman have been so unsuccessful at raising their children it’s in part because of the misuse of the initiative. The judgeical branches failure to govern their employees and discipline according. Allowing the state to fall to properly the psychologist who they force the people to use. Stop the local expert from misuse of referrals and information to weaponize the court house and legislation surrounding it. A full investigation into her conduct is long overdue.
Retort all you like. If the truth is what you are after then a witch/ bitch will school you. For years the same gentleman have been screaming women are the problem. They have all the solutions. Family court should not be designed for a gender. Nobody ever said men weren’t victims. Either you want women working and sharing child care or you want them as an appliance? I’m guessing you choose a Maytag .
You are fundamentally dishonest if you say that the human world is not constrained by biological fact.
That said, I never intimated that “women” were the problem. Only women who seek to redefine and legislate contrary to natural law, physical reality, and common sense.
And my personal observation is that most of them ride broomsticks.
Riding for the right not to be abused and have your children taken is a human right. There are biological and gender roles people would like to retain. It should not depend on your wages. Court reform has very little women. They are justifiable and unjustified having them exposed. I don’t see anyone looking at the men doing it excecept ones who are pictured on brooms. Hiding behind fudged facts and experimental psychology is unfair. Trying to keep overwhelmed funding under wraps while going after domestic violence funding is classic. Controller 101 rendering them penniless and unable to fight for their life or their children. If Mr. Weigel and his associates want to fix family court their not leading to a fair fight. Witches and bitches are not born they are created. Children are a hot button. All women have a bitch button. Especially with children. The button works just like a door bell. Keep pushing the button and eventually the bitch is going to answer the door. If you don’t want to hear what bitches have to say they should keep their fingers off the button. Claiming abuse doesn’t exist, blaming women for it, taking their children and leaving them in poverty is a trigger. Mr. Weigel and some of his associates keep the fingers on the button. Not for kids, but the control of them. All the means of assistance to survive. Up lifting men should not come at the cost of women.
“Witches and bitches are not born they are created … All women have a bitch button.”
Which one is it?
Created by the relentless pushing of the narrative they are all lying and threatening to put children in harms way. Relentless attacking their character. These situations drive people into a corner. Self defense instinct are engrained. Most are not born bitchy or witchy. It’s the creation of the situation that brings the situation to a head. Women were not born to have to keep defending themselves. When they do they are suddenly bitchy and witchy. It would appear that the warriors are up late nights calling and harassing family court victims that are women. Women number are given out. When some loose their children they receive harassing texts asking them how they feel. This is cruel and inhumane. Would drive anyone in witchy bitchy mode. Or would these people rather these mothers harm themselves?
The honest truth is you support domestic violence perpitors. To say that all these men and some of these women are not guilty of domestic violence if fundamentally false. It’s all silver bullets? ” These are not domestic violence issues, these are disagreements.” Please define what your interpretation of domestic violence. Please explain why you and all the other family court journalist have not addressed all of the fundamentals mistrust of your friend? Tossing blankets over family court cases and the promotion of parental alienation. You attack other family court journalist for betraying the journalist oath. Yet, you ignore the continued ranting of the* expert ” who has been implementing Alienation bullets at women for several decades. I have seen the internet comment calling you a pedophile. I don’t believe you are. This is no different than being called a malicious alienator because you go to court and tell the truth. In all of your blogs you claim not to be bias. You place article up about women who have lost their children unjustly to abusive men and some women. Do you believe their should be no protection for them? While you go on to blame the violence against women act for increasing cases. The expert know that their are many more victims who don’t come forward. While hidding even more money in the father’s rights programs. This is not balanced journalism. This is a bias based on your friendships. For the last several years women have been sending information to you and other gentleman in the family court fights to fix the system. The information has been ignored. You tell them to get their own blog. Aren’t you guilty of the same thing You accuse Susan Bassi of? Despite the individual article you write for women the flip side is what are you really doing to help them? What is David Weigel doing to help them? Your attacking women baised funding and ignoring the discriminating funding placing fatherhood above everything else. These are 30 percent of cases. In which there are real problems. Which you have decided that prodomity women are lying because now they have funding. Perhaps they are coming out of the woodwork because Domestic violence actually exists. Some of your friends are actually perpitors of it. It would appear that your friends are actually engaging in it by proxy. It’s not bad enough that victims continue to have to fight in family court. You want to take valuable service away from them. Valuable service away from children caught up in it. Forced to go to services by ” Alienation industry” professionals who are ultimately failing to provide ethical services. In stead of attacking vowa funding, perhaps you should actually investigate the the failed government agencies task to investigate them. You have become part of the problem and not the solution. You bring your sword to the fight and I bring the broom stick. I’m about telling the truth and not just the version your friends want to pass legislation that is completely in their favor to do dominate the court house. Let’s be honest that is exactly what the warrior project is all about. It’s not about gathering facts. It’s about gathering numbers to go to the public officials and pass legislation and take away funding from the most vulnerable people in society. Children, victims and the less monitized parents. These are not warriors these are bullies who will do anything to control, manipulate and dominate family court procedures. Please disclose how much money you are being paid to promote the project and cherry picked article. The public has the right to know.
I appreciate your message and the opportunity to clarify a few things.
First, I am not paid by anyone—not the Warrior Project, not any political group, not any legal network. I write because I believe sunlight is the only disinfectant strong enough to reach the rot inside America’s family courts.
Second, I disavow and expose all abusers—male or female, appointed or non-appointed, judicial or civilian. Abuse is abuse. There are women who abuse, men who abuse, and systems that enable both. My reporting has consistently shown that corruption and control, not gender, drive most of what happens in these courts.
When I report on “silver bullet” domestic violence claims, I don’t deny real abuse exists. I’ve interviewed real victims. But I also document when false or weaponized claims are used to destroy innocent parents—because that, too, is a form of abuse.
Domestic violence, in my view, includes physical harm, coercive control, psychological intimidation, and institutional retaliation—when courts, lawyers, or therapists use their power to harm vulnerable people.
You mention bias. My work speaks for itself. I have published stories defending protective mothers, exposing abusive fathers, and confronting unethical judges and lawyers of both sexes. The Family Court Circus, FL Gulf News, and NY News Press have all run pieces showing how state and federal funding mechanisms—like parts of the Violence Against Women Act and the fatherhood initiative—are being exploited for political and financial gain. That’s not an attack on victims; it’s an attack on corruption.
You also ask what I’m “doing to help.” I help by telling the truth—without funding, without protection, and often at personal risk. My only loyalty is to transparency. If anyone in my circle is proven to be an abuser, I’ll expose them too. No exceptions.
I cover the “warrior” movement. It isn’t about control; it’s about accountability. Legislators respond to numbers and documentation. Gathering victims and evidence isn’t domination—it’s reform.
You said you bring the broomstick. Fair enough. But if we’re cleaning the same house, then let’s sweep in the same direction. The fight isn’t man versus woman—it’s honest journalism versus a system that profits from both sides’ pain.
— Richard Luthmann
Fair enough
P. S. Mr. Luthmann, I circle the blog on my broom stick not because I love victims. I love the truth and not just the version some people are telling. You are entitled to your opinions. The public is entitled to all the facts. A full examination of the funding streams. Not just cancelling because people are upset about paying child support. Canceling critical services. Ensuring the service is helping people and not just being placed in the States hands to make payroll. Ate the courts trained on domestic violence? Or just parental alienation claims? Following the AFCC and you will get your answers.
You ladies have been around a long time:
https://thefamilycourtcircus.com/2017/04/24/lifes-a-bitch/
Dear Mr Luthmann,
While Mr. Weigel and his friends have decided that the government has funded a cauldron of witches to make money off child support. Some of us have been attempting to find out the facts. According to father’s for change 70 percent of children have contact with their fathers who after police and state intervention for father’s who have inflicted family violence. The is true regardless of whether anything has been done to address their behavior. Children’s exposure to DV is prevalent, 1 in 6 children impacted in the United States. Most of these children also experience direct forms of child maltreatment, including physical abuse, emotional and neglect. ” Go to criminal court ” While Domestic Violence charges are plea bargained and nullified so fathers can remain out of jail and qualify for state run programs. Alienation claims are filed. The batterer obstructs services other than reunification. Engaging in coercive control. Which is the core essence of domestic violence. ” In my 35 years and thousands of cases I have dealt with Domestic Violence and parental alienation 99 % of all my cases contain false allegations. Joan Kloth Zanard. December 2021.” Murder suicide and false allegations at the hands of female perpetrators. The statistics don’t lie. February 2024 ” Scientifically unsound theories that treat mother’s abuse allegations are likely to attempt to undermine the father are frequently applied. ” Calling all Parental Alienation Warriors “. Last year in Mr. Luthmann’s substack, Is this for real. Joan Kloth Zanard. November 11,2021 Go fund me Joan is married with one child. What happened to the other child in the divorce paperwork? Joan and her associates have been attacking women for years and the cauldron is sick of it. Have been treated unjustly because as a result of it.
The Federally Funded Fudging of facts. The One hundred Billion Dollar Man. The national fatherhood Initiative the federal government spends $99.8 billion dollars every year on programs. Such as child support enforcement or lack of $113 billion dollars in arrearages and anti-poverty efforts- to support fathers-absent homes. False facts. “Fatherless epidemic” an oversimplification exaggerated based on flawed facts. Failing to count fathers who are still involved. Unwed fathers involved by not on the birth certificate, unwed but living in the household. Outdated data on single mother households. Single mother’s households are made up of widows, incarcerated fathers, deployed fathers, and other factors. Divorce and child rearing are not just for gifts and prizes. Men remarry 64% percent between 1 and 3 years where women do not. While men complain about toxic feminist, while women are viewed as modern convinces cooking, cleaning among other things. If they stop doing those things they are replaced like appliances. Single mothers and their children are stigmatized, while single fathers and their children are glorified. Fathers without child custody are victims and women with custody are liars’ gold diggers and malicious alienators.
Both Parents are at risk of higher rates of suicide during divorce process. The highest number of suicides for both genders is the same age as divorces are filed. Men make up 80 % of the suicides in America.
Despite claims linking school shootings to single mother households, there is no definitive evidence of causal relationship. Again, oversimplifying and blaming mothers. What is real? Is parental alienation real? It’s a blanket tossed on top of a family court case to oversimplify a complex family issue, often rooted in the inability of an abusive parent to take responsibility for their own actions. Parental Alienation claims have done nothing to stop corruption, systematic failures and fixed the family court system. Is at the core of the one-sided warrior project selling the notion to women they will receive custody back at least 50% of the time. If they promote the project and alienation. There are claims that the majority of members in the warrior project are women. Obviously, the judges are not being biased by Domestic violence funding or under the spell of witchcraft.
Best regards Glinda and The Northern Witch Society of survivors
Allow me to retort: