Skip to content

Rule 4d waiver

Lights Camera Perjury: Judge Sarala Nagala exposes Christopher Ambrose’s false service claim against journalist Frank Parlato.

Lights Camera Perjury

    Christopher Ambrose’s latest legal stunt fell flat. The disgraced Hollywood writer-turned-litigator tried to convince a federal judge that he’d personally served investigative journalist Frank Parlato with a defamation lawsuit—but the proof didn’t match his claim. The deputy’s own notes showed no service was made. Judge Sarala Nagala swiftly denied Ambrose’s motion, keeping Parlato’s extended response deadline intact and refusing to make him pay Ambrose’s $40 “service fee.” For Ambrose—already infamous for plagiarizing a Bones script and losing his first lawsuit—it’s another credibility collapse in a saga defined by deceit, desperation, and bad process.

    Alleged Psycho Pedo Ambrose’s defamation suit against Frank Parlato stumbles as claims of a “sent” Rule 4(d) packet lack proof. Lies catch up.

    Alleged Psycho Pedo Ambrose Continues His Lies

      Christopher Ambrose, the disgraced ex–TV writer branded by critics (including his own children) as an “alleged psycho pedo,” is suing investigative journalist Frank Parlato in federal court. Ambrose insists he already sent Parlato a Rule 4(d) waiver packet more than 30 days ago. Parlato checked his inboxes and archives—nothing. “Say it. Show it. Or fix it,” Parlato fired back, demanding proof of service or correction of the record. Ambrose, who has a history of lawsuits, now faces questions of perjury and honesty before the court. For now, the record shows crickets. Accuracy isn’t optional—it’s the law.