Skip to content

Rule 11 sanctions

Alleged Psycho Pedo Ambrose’s defamation suit against Frank Parlato stumbles as claims of a “sent” Rule 4(d) packet lack proof. Lies catch up.

Alleged Psycho Pedo Ambrose Continues His Lies

    Christopher Ambrose, the disgraced ex–TV writer branded by critics (including his own children) as an “alleged psycho pedo,” is suing investigative journalist Frank Parlato in federal court. Ambrose insists he already sent Parlato a Rule 4(d) waiver packet more than 30 days ago. Parlato checked his inboxes and archives—nothing. “Say it. Show it. Or fix it,” Parlato fired back, demanding proof of service or correction of the record. Ambrose, who has a history of lawsuits, now faces questions of perjury and honesty before the court. For now, the record shows crickets. Accuracy isn’t optional—it’s the law.

    Matt Grant's RICO Falters: Joshua Divine blasts his 170-page complaint against the Missouri Family Court and warns of sanctions.

    Matt Grant’s RICO Falters Against Missouri Family Court

      Matt Grant’s bold RICO lawsuit against Missouri’s family court system is now teetering on the brink. On September 3, U.S. District Judge Joshua M. Divine blasted Grant’s 170-page complaint, calling it “plainly deficient many times over” and warning that sanctions may follow. Grant, a veteran St. Louis lawyer, styled himself as a crusader against what he calls a “Family Court Mafia,” but his sprawling allegations and sweeping remedies have left the court skeptical. Critics say Grant aimed too high. Now, the question looms: is the federal courthouse a refuge for justice—or another fortress of the swamp?