Legal Reform

“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well

By Michael Phillips | Originally posted on The Thunder Report When FITSNews published its bombshell 2023 investigation exposing corruption in South Carolina’s family courts, many readers were stunned by the scale of the rot: backroom deals, judicial favoritism, lawyer-legislator protectionism, and a Guardian ad Litem (GAL) system used not to protect children, but to punish the parents who dared to speak out. Now, nearly two years later, the case of William Sewell, a self-represented father from Summerville, South Carolina, confirms that the systemic abuse uncovered in “Mother Doe’s” case was not an anomaly. In fact, Sewell’s experience with Family Court Judge Mandy Kimmons, attorney Donnie Gamache, and GAL Jason Wheeler… Read More »“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well

COLORADO JUDICIAL JUNGLE

Rabbi Jacob Bellinsky dropped a bombshell on Colorado’s judiciary with his June 27 exposé, accusing the courts of operating a $2.3 million taxpayer-funded “shadow system” rife with corruption and constitutional abuse. The so-called “Senior Judge Program,” he claims, allows judges under investigation to issue unlawful orders and escape scrutiny. Bellinsky says this isn’t bureaucratic sloppiness—it’s a “coordinated institutional criminality.” With multiple federal cases, Supreme Court filings, and whistleblower documents, Bellinsky is calling on Congress and DOJ for immediate RICO prosecution. “Colorado’s judiciary has declared war on the Constitution,” he warns. “And I’m not going away.”

Brain Scans Reveal Abuse: Oregon DHS ignores scientific evidence, punishing protective mother Martina Flanigan while endangering her children.

Brain Scans Reveal Abuse—Oregon DHS Turns Blind Eye

What may be a flashpoint case has gripped Oregon. The Amen Clinic’s SPECT imaging revealed traumatic brain injuries in Martina Flanigan’s children—evidence pointing to severe abuse. Despite this, Oregon’s Department of Human Services (DHS) and Family Court have dismissed the scientific findings, targeting Flanigan for her advocacy. Protective mothers and their families face retaliation, while abusers remain shielded. This case underscores a systemic failure where science is sidelined, and children’s safety is compromised. The question remains: when will Oregon prioritize the well-being of its most vulnerable over bureaucratic denial and institutional inertia?