judicial misconduct

Colorado Records Rat: Rabbi Bellinsky says smoking gun email damns Colorado’s top court administrator in perjury records scandal.

Colorado Records Rat?: Steven Vasconcellos

Rabbi Jacob Bellinsky, fresh off a landmark Tenth Circuit victory, is now battling Colorado’s top judicial administrator over public records. In a Denver courtroom, Bellinsky accuses State Court Administrator Steven Vasconcellos of perjury for swearing “no records exist” about judicial misconduct complaints. Emails tell a different story. One August 2024 email assured Bellinsky complaints were “actively investigated.” Another November 2024 email admitted a misconduct memo was “completed back in August” but withheld for five months. Bellinsky says these contradictions prove a cover-up. He calls it “a constitutional emergency.” The case could force unprecedented transparency—or validate systemic concealment.

Costa Mesa Cops Stonewall: PD hiding public records tied to journalist Julie Holburn’s corruption probe into Orange County family courts.

Costa Mesa Cops Stonewall Reporter on Court Corruption Files

Costa Mesa Police are hiding something. Investigative journalist Julie M. Anderson-Holburn says they’re stonewalling her public records request in a case tied directly to her explosive reporting on Orange County family court corruption. Holburn requested police reports contradicting court claims made by high-powered attorney David Monarch. But the cops won’t release a word—citing “privacy” and ignoring their obligations under California law. Critics say it’s retaliation for Holburn’s journalism. CMPD’s excuses have sparked national outrage. “They’re using every loophole to keep those reports in the dark,” says Holburn. Now she’s going public—again. Costa Mesa may have picked the wrong journalist to cross.

Secret Custody Orders, Rogue GALs, and Corruption dominate Idaho Family Court Reform at the Child Custody and Domestic Relations Task Force.

Secret Custody Orders, ‘Rogue GALs’ Under Fire at Idaho Family Court Hearing

Idaho’s Child Custody and Domestic Relations Task Force heard explosive testimony on July 31 about family court failures that destroy families. Witnesses described secret custody orders, unaccountable “rogue GALs,” and a “cash-for-conflict” court system that enriches lawyers while bankrupting parents. Lawmakers, including Sen. Tammy Nichols and Rep. Heather Scott, vowed reform. Arizona Rep. Rachel Keshel demanded jury trials in custody cases and denounced judicial bias. Parents accused courts of weaponizing “parental alienation” and ignoring abuse. GAL Kacey Wall defended the system, while critics said she embodies the problem. Nichols pledged reform is coming: “If there’s a pattern, we’re going to act.”

Streeto’s Connecticut Judicial Candy Scandal

In a stunning collapse of judicial decorum, Judge Melissa Streeto of Connecticut’s Superior Court dropped more than just opinions — she delivered “bags of dicks” as gag gifts to her clerks. Literally. The Rockville-based judge, known for her rulings on habeas petitions, left x-rated candy shaped like male genitalia along with affectionate notes on subordinate desks, all while donning her latex beneath the black robe of justice. The Judicial Branch is spinning, with Chief Judge Elizabeth Bozzuto offering weak reassurances while Streeto “self-reports” to the Judicial Review Council.

Colorado Judicial Jungle: Rabbi Jacob Bellinsky exposes a shadow court system, demanding prosecution for constitutional violations and fraud.

Rabbi’s Landmark Court Win Exposes Colorado Family Court Corruption

A Colorado rabbi just made legal history. Rabbi Jacob Bellinsky won a stunning reversal at the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals after years of battling family court corruption. The appellate court revived his lawsuits, which accuse his ex-wife, her lawyer, state judges, and officials of orchestrating a fraudulent custody and criminal campaign to destroy his family and reputation. The ruling strikes a blow against the widespread abuse of judicial immunity and abstention doctrines that have long protected bad actors. Bellinsky’s fight is now the national symbol of resistance against lawless family court systems.

Idaho Senator Tammy Nichols exposes family court abuses—secret custody orders and rogue GALs weaponized to punish parents.

Idaho Senator Tammy Nichols Exposes Family Court’s Secret ‘Legal Weapons’

Idaho State Senator Tammy Nichols is blowing the whistle on what she calls the family court system’s “legal weapons.” In a fiery episode of The Unknown Podcast, Nichols joined journalists Michael Volpe and Richard Luthmann to expose how judges and attorneys use ex parte custody orders and unaccountable guardians ad litem (GALs) to steamroll parents—mostly mothers—without hearings, evidence, or appeal. These tools are used nationwide to silence and bankrupt the powerless. Nichols calls it a civil rights crisis and vows sweeping reform through her statewide task force. With media silent, the grassroots are rising—and Idaho just lit the fuse.

The New Guard

On September 11, 2025, Connecticut’s family court insiders will gather at the elite Elm City Club to celebrate their own. The Council for Non-Adversarial Divorce will honor psychologist Sidney S. Horowitz for his decades of influence on custody litigation. Critics say this is no celebration — it’s a coronation for the next generation of judges and court vendors who profit from prolonged custody fights. Families, especially mothers, allege a system rigged for profit, with entrenched actors using “the best interest of the child” to justify private pay appointments, unchecked discretion, and court-empowered trauma. Reformers call it legalized racketeering in plain sight.

First Amendment Allergic Reaction: Judges in the Mist

In Connecticut’s twisted judicial theater, Judge Peter L. Brown nearly choked on the First Amendment—triggered by blog posts and Joette Katz’s authoritarian musings. The blog that drives judges mad, The Family Court Circus, has long skewered Katz, a former justice turned censor-in-chief. Her 2022 op-ed, “When Is Enough Enough?”, drew fire for labeling satire as criminal “threats.” Now, a courtroom transcript reveals Judge Brown’s allergic meltdown over the blog’s political speech, exposing the fragile egos and coordinated efforts of Katz, Gold, Bozzuto, and their DEI-infused judicial gang to weaponize the courts against free expression. The First Amendment’s enemies wear robes.

Judicial Speech Police

In the People’s Republic of Connecticut, free speech now comes with a security review. A shadowy branch within the judiciary—led by DEI apparatchiks like Chief Justice Raheem Mullins and Marshal Services Director O’Donovan Murphy—has redefined citizen dissent as “threats” against judges. Under the guise of “judicial security,” the state now spies on political speech, targeting bloggers and critics with an unaccountable Office of Protective Intelligence. But where are the arrests, prosecutions, or public threat definitions? Nowhere. The speech police are here, cloaked in robes and race-baiting rhetoric, declaring war on the First Amendment—because the judiciary can’t take the heat.

COLORADO JUDICIAL JUNGLE

Rabbi Jacob Bellinsky dropped a bombshell on Colorado’s judiciary with his June 27 exposé, accusing the courts of operating a $2.3 million taxpayer-funded “shadow system” rife with corruption and constitutional abuse. The so-called “Senior Judge Program,” he claims, allows judges under investigation to issue unlawful orders and escape scrutiny. Bellinsky says this isn’t bureaucratic sloppiness—it’s a “coordinated institutional criminality.” With multiple federal cases, Supreme Court filings, and whistleblower documents, Bellinsky is calling on Congress and DOJ for immediate RICO prosecution. “Colorado’s judiciary has declared war on the Constitution,” he warns. “And I’m not going away.”

Thunder Strikes Back: Michael “Thunder” Phillips joins The Unknown Podcast to expose the truth about corrupt family courts.

THUNDER STRIKES BACK ON FAMILY COURT

Family court has become America’s most dangerous courtroom—and Maryland attorney Jeff Reichert is its latest casualty. On The Unknown Podcast, co-hosts Richard Luthmann and Michael Volpe are joined by Michael “Thunder” Phillips to expose how Reichert lost his son despite a solid custody order, damning evidence against the mother, and overwhelming judicial misconduct. Phillips draws eerie parallels to his own case and calls for family court reform. From Post Malone to Elon Musk, they expose how money shields celebrities, while everyday parents are destroyed. This isn’t justice—it’s a system fueled by power, politics, and profit.

Ned Lamont Under Pressure: Paul Boyne exposes illegal raids, unconstitutional laws, and judicial bias in a landmark free speech battle.

NED LAMONT UNDER PRESSURE: BOYNE DROPS BOMBSHELLS ON THE UNKNOWN PODCAST

On The Unknown Podcast, Paul Boyne delivered a thunderous rebuke of Connecticut’s political and judicial elite. With hosts Richard Luthmann and Michael Volpe, Boyne detailed his civil and criminal battles against Governor Ned Lamont, exposing illegal extradition, stolen evidence, and judicial corruption. He accused state actors of violating the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, breaching the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, and suppressing constitutionally protected speech through an unconstitutional “stalking speech” law. From the Silver Platter Doctrine to Joette Katz’s behind-the-scenes influence, this episode is a masterclass in how state power can be abused to silence political dissent.

Family Court's Star Chamber: Dr. Bandy Lee sues NJ Judge over unconstitutional gag orders and judicial abuse exposing systemic corruption.

FAMILY COURT’S STAR CHAMBER: BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Dr. Bandy X. Lee, a former Yale professor and Harvard-trained forensic psychiatrist, is taking on the heart of judicial darkness in Bergen County, New Jersey. In a blistering federal lawsuit, Dr. Lee accuses Chief Judge Jane Gallina-Mecca, GAL Evelyn Nissirios, and Judge Michael Antoniewicz of weaponizing gag orders to silence her First Amendment-protected speech. With over 2,500 signatures on an impeachment petition and constitutional scholar Bruce Fein representing her in federal court, Dr. Lee’s battle is drawing national attention. “They may have gagged me in court,” she said, “but they will never silence the truth.”

Fake Family Court Police: Meet the Justice Pretenders

Meet the Justice Pretenders—the so-called “Family Court Police” that operate with zero oversight and questionable authority. These part-time enforcers don badges from Party City, show up in mismatched uniforms, and terrify families with threats of child abduction. They operate only during business hours, moonlight as clowns by night, and claim to follow “court orders” that rarely exist. With no trauma training and six-figure taxpayer-funded salaries, they rip kids from homes under the guise of child safety. Who are they? What are their qualifications? And how do they get away with it? Let’s expose this system’s worst-kept secret.

Georgia Family Court Whistleblower: Maureen Meadows reveals racial bias, GAL fraud, and a “star chamber” of secret lawyer discipline.

Georgia Family Court Whistleblower Blows the Lid Off Secret Discipline System

Maureen Meadows, a family law attorney turned whistleblower, says Georgia’s family court system is “rigged” to protect big law partners and crush parents. Her divorce exposed fake reports, false statements, and a “star chamber” of secret lawyer discipline. “They lied and got away with it,” she said. David Weigel, founder of the Family Court Fraud Warrior Project, says legal fiduciaries get a free pass while Wall Street fiduciaries face constant scrutiny. “It’s astounding,” Weigel said. Meadows wants federal oversight, warning: “If they can do this to me, imagine what they’re doing to parents who can’t fight back.”

PAYWALL OF JUSTICE: ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

After stonewalling for nearly a year, the Orange County Superior Court (OCSC) has hit investigative journalist Julie M. Anderson Holburn with a stunning $4,240 fee for a single public records report. The court’s months-long delays, bogus legal excuses, false retention claims, and personal attacks reveal a disturbing pattern: deny, deflect, retaliate. Holburn’s requests—clearly protected under California Rule of Court 10.500—seek basic family court administrative data already available on courthouse terminals. But instead of compliance, OCSC has chosen obfuscation. At stake is not just transparency, but the constitutional right of every Californian to know what their courts are doing.

THE COURTROOM CON: MONICA CIARDI’S SENTENCING EXPOSES NJ’S CORRUPT MACHINE

Protective mother Monica Ciardi faces sentencing today in Essex County, NJ, despite no confirmed indictment, no allocution of rights, and no proof she knowingly waived her parental and First Amendment rights. Her felony plea deal—negotiated under pressure, without due process—includes a gag order and opens the door for permanent separation from her children. Critics call it a state-sanctioned shakedown led by corrupt Morris and Essex County officials. With federal eyes now on the case, pressure mounts on Judge Michael L. Ravin to stop what legal advocates say is a court-run extortion racket against a protective mom who refused to stay quiet.