Skip to content

First Amendment

Christopher Ambrose is a Shitty Lawyer: Credibly accused pedophile seeks unprecedented lifetime gag order against journalist Frank Parlato.

Christopher Ambrose is a Shitty Lawyer

    Christopher A. Ambrose, a suspended New York attorney and disgraced TV writer, is now demanding something no American court has ever granted: a lifetime gag order muzzling journalist Frank Parlato Jr. Ambrose wants Parlato banned from ever mentioning his name again, forced to delete years of reporting, issue a public apology, and pay millions. Legal experts say Ambrose’s 109-page filing reads like a wish list for authoritarian censorship, not a federal lawsuit. His past failures, plagiarism scandal, and history of vexatious litigation only amplify the absurdity. Ambrose wants silence. Instead, he’s getting sunlight.

    Criminal Undertones: CT Judge and Cops Accused of Jailing Blogger for Opinions

      A Connecticut free-speech case is exploding into a full-blown constitutional controversy. Local blogger Robert Pabich was arrested after posting online criticisms of State Senator Matt Lesser, sparking outrage among civil-liberties advocates who say Rocky Hill police and Judge Jesse Giddings trampled the First Amendment. Officers used a “risk warrant” to seize Pabich’s firearms before charging him with stalking and disorderly conduct—based solely on political expression. Critics say this criminalizes dissent and weaponizes the justice system against unpopular viewpoints. The case has become a flashpoint in the national debate over hate-speech laws, judicial bias, and freedom of political speech.

      Stalking Zealots: Connecticut faces a free speech showdown as activism, online accountability, and government policy collide.

      Stalking Zealots

        A growing debate in Connecticut highlights the collision between online activism and the First Amendment. Critics say certain watchdog groups, including StopAntisemitism.org, blur the line between public accountability and digital harassment by naming and shaming individuals for controversial opinions. Supporters call it justified exposure; opponents call it censorship. With Governor Ned Lamont’s Hate Crimes Council expanding its reach, free-speech advocates warn of state-endorsed policing of thought. The question is simple but profound: when does fighting hate become hating dissent?

        FYGA Paul Boyne: A polite email to a Connecticut judge sparks outrage, exposing the Nutmeg State’s deep contempt for the First Amendment.

        FYGA Paul Boyne

          Paul Boyne, founder of The Family Court Circus and champion of the constitutional republic, is once again under judicial fire in Connecticut’s “Nutmeg” courts. His crime? Sending an email. Boyne’s polite but pointed message to Judges John Newson and Gerald Harmon sparked outrage among the black-robed elite, who responded not with reason—but with rage. “INAPPROPRIATE,” Newson thundered. In a state where “FYGA” (“F*** You Go Away”) is the unofficial judicial motto, Boyne’s message was treated not as a plea for justice, but as heresy against the sacred cult of Connecticut law.

          Judge Boots Black Journalist, Admits Race Was Reason?

            An Oregon administrative hearing exploded into a constitutional fight when OAH Judge Jennifer H. Rackstraw booted Black investigative reporter Rick LaRivière. According to an unofficial transcript, Rackstraw answered “Yes” when asked if she was excluding him for being Black and a journalist, then claimed Oregon law required secrecy. LaRivière refused to leave. He demanded a written order to “file an emergency petition with the Federal District Court.” The state moved to delay. Rackstraw shut it down and reset it in person—promising LaRivière “will not be allowed in.” DOJ counsel Rachel E. Bertoni stayed silent on the record as the Star Chamber vibe spread.

            Boyne's Connecticut Justice Fraud: Gag orders, illegal raids, and judicial cover-ups in a First Amendment battle shaking the state system.

            Boyne’s Connecticut Justice Fraud

              Connecticut blogger and journalist Paul Boyne has become the unlikely face of America’s First Amendment fight. Prosecutor Jack Doyle’s two-page gag motion to muzzle Boyne ignited a firestorm, barring him from publishing his own discovery. On The Unknown Podcast, Richard Luthmann and Michael Volpe shredded the move as unconstitutional overreach. Boyne accused Governor Ned Lamont’s agents of staging an illegal raid and claimed ex-Justice Joette Katz secretly pulled strings. His lawyer, Todd Bussert, offered only a half-hearted fight. Boyne calls it “pretend justice” — a system that tramples speech and proves Connecticut no longer honors the First Amendment.

              Pretend Justice Exposed

                Connecticut’s so-called “justice system” is rotting from within, and Jack Doyle is Exhibit A. Paid $215,000 a year, the New Haven State’s Attorney pretends to be a prosecutor, pretends to be a lawyer, pretends to honor the Constitution—but in reality, he’s a puppet for political bosses and outside agendas. Critics say Doyle has weaponized the courts to muzzle speech, crush dissent, and protect the powerful. From illegal warrants to gag orders, from family court tyranny to free press crackdowns, Doyle plays the role of sovereign protector while trampling the very rights he swore to uphold.

                First Amendment Allergic Reaction: Judges in the Mist

                  In Connecticut’s twisted judicial theater, Judge Peter L. Brown nearly choked on the First Amendment—triggered by blog posts and Joette Katz’s authoritarian musings. The blog that drives judges mad, The Family Court Circus, has long skewered Katz, a former justice turned censor-in-chief. Her 2022 op-ed, “When Is Enough Enough?”, drew fire for labeling satire as criminal “threats.” Now, a courtroom transcript reveals Judge Brown’s allergic meltdown over the blog’s political speech, exposing the fragile egos and coordinated efforts of Katz, Gold, Bozzuto, and their DEI-infused judicial gang to weaponize the courts against free expression. The First Amendment’s enemies wear robes.

                  Black Chief Justice Raheem Mullins

                  Judicial Speech Police

                    In the People’s Republic of Connecticut, free speech now comes with a security review. A shadowy branch within the judiciary—led by DEI apparatchiks like Chief Justice Raheem Mullins and Marshal Services Director O’Donovan Murphy—has redefined citizen dissent as “threats” against judges. Under the guise of “judicial security,” the state now spies on political speech, targeting bloggers and critics with an unaccountable Office of Protective Intelligence. But where are the arrests, prosecutions, or public threat definitions? Nowhere. The speech police are here, cloaked in robes and race-baiting rhetoric, declaring war on the First Amendment—because the judiciary can’t take the heat.

                    Ned Lamont Under Pressure: Paul Boyne exposes illegal raids, unconstitutional laws, and judicial bias in a landmark free speech battle.

                    NED LAMONT UNDER PRESSURE: BOYNE DROPS BOMBSHELLS ON THE UNKNOWN PODCAST

                      On The Unknown Podcast, Paul Boyne delivered a thunderous rebuke of Connecticut’s political and judicial elite. With hosts Richard Luthmann and Michael Volpe, Boyne detailed his civil and criminal battles against Governor Ned Lamont, exposing illegal extradition, stolen evidence, and judicial corruption. He accused state actors of violating the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, breaching the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, and suppressing constitutionally protected speech through an unconstitutional “stalking speech” law. From the Silver Platter Doctrine to Joette Katz’s behind-the-scenes influence, this episode is a masterclass in how state power can be abused to silence political dissent.

                      PAYWALL OF JUSTICE: ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

                        After stonewalling for nearly a year, the Orange County Superior Court (OCSC) has hit investigative journalist Julie M. Anderson Holburn with a stunning $4,240 fee for a single public records report. The court’s months-long delays, bogus legal excuses, false retention claims, and personal attacks reveal a disturbing pattern: deny, deflect, retaliate. Holburn’s requests—clearly protected under California Rule of Court 10.500—seek basic family court administrative data already available on courthouse terminals. But instead of compliance, OCSC has chosen obfuscation. At stake is not just transparency, but the constitutional right of every Californian to know what their courts are doing.

                        Boyne Strikes Back: Accuses CT of censorship, illegal raids, ADA abuse, and jurisdiction fraud in a landmark First Amendment battle.

                        BOYNE STRIKES BACK: IS JACK ON CRACK OR JUST PLAIN WHACK?

                          Paul Boyne is no longer just defending himself—he’s going to war. After 18 months in jail for incendiary blog posts targeting Connecticut judges, the controversial former FamilyCourtCircus.com publisher appeared on The Unknown Podcast to lay out what he calls “a federal case against the State of Connecticut.” From unconstitutional speech charges to illegal property seizures, from ADA violations to extradition fraud, Boyne names names: Jack Doyle, Joette Katz, Samantha McCord, and even Gov. Ned Lamont. Boyne demands justice. “This isn’t law,” he said. “It’s control. And it’s time for them to pay.”

                          Parental Religious Opt-Outs: Mahmoud v. Taylor and the Battle Over Books, Rights, and Belief in America’s Schools

                            A legal firestorm is brewing in Mahmoud v. Taylor, now before the U.S. Supreme Court. At stake: the right of parents to shield their children from public school lessons that clash with religious beliefs. What began as a dispute over LGBTQ+ storybooks in Maryland has exploded into a national fight over the First Amendment, diversity in education, and parental control. As the Court weighs whether public schools can deny opt-out requests, the decision could ripple across classrooms from coast to coast. It’s a defining moment in the clash between faith and curriculum—and the next landmark in America’s culture war.

                            Cinderella's Balls Get Busted: Connecticut officials target citizens for free speech under false “unauthorized practice” claims.

                            CINDERELLA’S BALLS GET BUSTED

                              Cinderella’s Balls Get Busted: Connecticut officials target citizens for free speech under false “unauthorized practice” claims.

                              Family Court Censorship Busted: Judge Farber denies gag order in explosive NJ divorce case, defending press freedom and the First Amendment.

                              Family Court Censorship Busted

                                Family Court Censorship Busted: Judge Farber denies gag order in explosive NJ divorce case, defending press freedom and the First Amendment.