Skip to content

First Amendment

First Amendment Allergic Reaction: Judges in the Mist

    In Connecticut’s twisted judicial theater, Judge Peter L. Brown nearly choked on the First Amendment—triggered by blog posts and Joette Katz’s authoritarian musings. The blog that drives judges mad, The Family Court Circus, has long skewered Katz, a former justice turned censor-in-chief. Her 2022 op-ed, “When Is Enough Enough?”, drew fire for labeling satire as criminal “threats.” Now, a courtroom transcript reveals Judge Brown’s allergic meltdown over the blog’s political speech, exposing the fragile egos and coordinated efforts of Katz, Gold, Bozzuto, and their DEI-infused judicial gang to weaponize the courts against free expression. The First Amendment’s enemies wear robes.

    Black Chief Justice Raheem Mullins

    Judicial Speech Police

      In the People’s Republic of Connecticut, free speech now comes with a security review. A shadowy branch within the judiciary—led by DEI apparatchiks like Chief Justice Raheem Mullins and Marshal Services Director O’Donovan Murphy—has redefined citizen dissent as “threats” against judges. Under the guise of “judicial security,” the state now spies on political speech, targeting bloggers and critics with an unaccountable Office of Protective Intelligence. But where are the arrests, prosecutions, or public threat definitions? Nowhere. The speech police are here, cloaked in robes and race-baiting rhetoric, declaring war on the First Amendment—because the judiciary can’t take the heat.

      Ned Lamont Under Pressure: Paul Boyne exposes illegal raids, unconstitutional laws, and judicial bias in a landmark free speech battle.

      NED LAMONT UNDER PRESSURE: BOYNE DROPS BOMBSHELLS ON THE UNKNOWN PODCAST

        On The Unknown Podcast, Paul Boyne delivered a thunderous rebuke of Connecticut’s political and judicial elite. With hosts Richard Luthmann and Michael Volpe, Boyne detailed his civil and criminal battles against Governor Ned Lamont, exposing illegal extradition, stolen evidence, and judicial corruption. He accused state actors of violating the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, breaching the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, and suppressing constitutionally protected speech through an unconstitutional “stalking speech” law. From the Silver Platter Doctrine to Joette Katz’s behind-the-scenes influence, this episode is a masterclass in how state power can be abused to silence political dissent.

        PAYWALL OF JUSTICE: ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

          After stonewalling for nearly a year, the Orange County Superior Court (OCSC) has hit investigative journalist Julie M. Anderson Holburn with a stunning $4,240 fee for a single public records report. The court’s months-long delays, bogus legal excuses, false retention claims, and personal attacks reveal a disturbing pattern: deny, deflect, retaliate. Holburn’s requests—clearly protected under California Rule of Court 10.500—seek basic family court administrative data already available on courthouse terminals. But instead of compliance, OCSC has chosen obfuscation. At stake is not just transparency, but the constitutional right of every Californian to know what their courts are doing.

          Boyne Strikes Back: Accuses CT of censorship, illegal raids, ADA abuse, and jurisdiction fraud in a landmark First Amendment battle.

          BOYNE STRIKES BACK: IS JACK ON CRACK OR JUST PLAIN WHACK?

            Paul Boyne is no longer just defending himself—he’s going to war. After 18 months in jail for incendiary blog posts targeting Connecticut judges, the controversial former FamilyCourtCircus.com publisher appeared on The Unknown Podcast to lay out what he calls “a federal case against the State of Connecticut.” From unconstitutional speech charges to illegal property seizures, from ADA violations to extradition fraud, Boyne names names: Jack Doyle, Joette Katz, Samantha McCord, and even Gov. Ned Lamont. Boyne demands justice. “This isn’t law,” he said. “It’s control. And it’s time for them to pay.”

            Parental Religious Opt-Outs: Mahmoud v. Taylor and the Battle Over Books, Rights, and Belief in America’s Schools

              A legal firestorm is brewing in Mahmoud v. Taylor, now before the U.S. Supreme Court. At stake: the right of parents to shield their children from public school lessons that clash with religious beliefs. What began as a dispute over LGBTQ+ storybooks in Maryland has exploded into a national fight over the First Amendment, diversity in education, and parental control. As the Court weighs whether public schools can deny opt-out requests, the decision could ripple across classrooms from coast to coast. It’s a defining moment in the clash between faith and curriculum—and the next landmark in America’s culture war.

              Cinderella's Balls Get Busted: Connecticut officials target citizens for free speech under false “unauthorized practice” claims.

              CINDERELLA’S BALLS GET BUSTED

                Cinderella’s Balls Get Busted: Connecticut officials target citizens for free speech under false “unauthorized practice” claims.

                Family Court Censorship Busted: Judge Farber denies gag order in explosive NJ divorce case, defending press freedom and the First Amendment.

                Family Court Censorship Busted

                  Family Court Censorship Busted: Judge Farber denies gag order in explosive NJ divorce case, defending press freedom and the First Amendment.

                  Under New Management

                  UNDER NEW MANAGEMENT

                    Under New Management: World-Famous The Family Court Circus Blog! Richard Luthmann leads a bold fight: free speech and exposing corruption.

                    True Threat?

                      What is a true threat? What is free speech? What is a rant? What is criminal speech? What is reckless speech? In Connecticut, criminal speech is speech that the judges don’t like. Talk about dead judges in a ditch in Connecticut, go to jail. Talk about dead judges in a ditch in Kansas, have a nice day, just another form of free expression. Such un-equal treatment of the same speech under the same Constitution is a troubling disparity in the land of the free and the home of the brave. The Great Grey Ponytail of New Haven, the Giant of the Profession, the last of the slash and burn trial… Read More »True Threat?

                      Hate Tong

                        Let’s examine what is driving the little prick of a chinaman from Stamford/Darien, Connecticut’s own William Tong.  Lately he has been shooting off his mouth about ‘hate crimes’ because of opposing political viewpoints of people he hates, expressed under the protection of the First Amendment.  Obviously, there is too much Mao in this transplanted Chinese Communist.  Some defect in his DNA makes him think he can silence political debate and make people read from the same page of a little book. Tong the constitutional clown was educated at Brown University and Chicago Law, where he learned nothing of being an American.  We the people don’t take shit from little brats… Read More »Hate Tong