child custody

Elon Musk Custody Battle: Battling exes in family court—and losing. Elon's billions can’t buy custody, control, or common sense.

Elon Musk Custody Battle: Even the Richest Man on Earth Can’t Hack Family Court

Elon Musk, the richest man on Earth, can build rockets, engineer AI, and shape global markets with a tweet. But in family court? He’s just another dad caught in the gears of a system that breaks even billionaires. With custody battles against exes Grimes and Ashley St. Clair, Musk faces accusations of neglect, court order violations, and retaliatory parenting. Despite his influence, he’s learning what millions of fathers already know: money and power don’t mean much when the judge bangs the gavel. If Musk can’t win in family court, what chance does the average dad have?

STATEN ISLAND FAMILY COURT SHAME

Marcello Roque, a Staten Island father, walked into Richmond County Family Court on May 27, 2025, to protect his daughter. Instead, he says he was assaulted, ejected, and silenced. Court staff blocked his petition. A clerk allegedly said, “This court doesn’t follow constitutional law.” When he began recording, officers swarmed him. One pushed him down the stairs despite his known injuries. Roque filed a police report—but says no action has been taken. His seven-year battle has exposed a judicial system he says protects abusers, silences whistleblowers, and tramples parental rights. Now, he’s demanding answers—and justice.

Post Malone’s Legal Encore: How Filing First in Utah Could Swing the Custody Battle

Post Malone’s custody battle has shifted to Utah, giving him an early advantage. Malone filed for primary custody in Utah just before his ex-fiancée, Hee Sung “Jamie” Park, filed in California. Under the UCCJEA, the child’s home state usually dictates jurisdiction. Malone argues that Utah is the child’s home state, leveraging his property and the child’s alleged primary residence there. Park claims California is home now. For Malone, winning jurisdiction in Utah could mean lower child support payments and better odds for primary custody. Filing first may prove decisive as this legal showdown unfolds.

Brain Scans Reveal Abuse: Oregon DHS ignores scientific evidence, punishing protective mother Martina Flanigan while endangering her children.

Brain Scans Reveal Abuse—Oregon DHS Turns Blind Eye

What may be a flashpoint case has gripped Oregon. The Amen Clinic’s SPECT imaging revealed traumatic brain injuries in Martina Flanigan’s children—evidence pointing to severe abuse. Despite this, Oregon’s Department of Human Services (DHS) and Family Court have dismissed the scientific findings, targeting Flanigan for her advocacy. Protective mothers and their families face retaliation, while abusers remain shielded. This case underscores a systemic failure where science is sidelined, and children’s safety is compromised. The question remains: when will Oregon prioritize the well-being of its most vulnerable over bureaucratic denial and institutional inertia?