Connecticut Family Court

Luthmann's Family Court Bombshells: Journo joins Maryann Petri exposing CPS corruption, Title IV fraud, missing children, and cancel culture.

LUTHMANN FAMILY COURT BOMBSHELLS: The Gauntlet is Thrown on Slam the Gavel Podcast

Richard Luthmann lit a match and tossed it straight into America’s family court system.

Appearing on Maryann Petri’s Slam the Gavel podcast, Luthmann accused CPS, family courts, and federally funded contractors of running a profit-driven racket fueled by Title IV money — with children treated as inventory and, in some cases, vanishing altogether.

From a 935% spike in missing Illinois foster kids to fake “advocates,” career criminals, and cancel-culture enforcers weaponizing the courts, Luthmann pulled no punches.

His message was blunt: follow the money, expose the fraud, and prosecute the predators — or shut the whole thing down.

Boyne’s Connecticut Case Collapsing: Illegal raids, stolen evidence, judicial misconduct, and massive First Amendment violations.

Boyne’s Connecticut Case Collapsing Under Constitutional Rot

Paul Boyne’s First Amendment nightmare is finally exploding into public view. The 70-year-old Virginia father and Annapolis grad now stands accused of “stalking” Connecticut judges with nothing more than words — fiery blog posts known as the “Hateful Eight.” For that speech alone, Connecticut slapped him with 18 felony counts, jailed him 17 months, raided his Virginia home illegally, and strapped a failing ankle monitor to his leg. Prosecutors used stolen evidence, sealed warrants, and media gags. Judges looked the other way. Former Justice Joette Katz allegedly pulled strings from the shadows. And now, the entire prosecution is collapsing under the weight of its constitutional rot.

Family Court Truth: National Experts warn that secret family courts are a nationwide public-health crisis harming children and families,

Family Court Truth at National Press Club Summit

A national reckoning hit Washington on Nov. 11, when lawmakers, doctors, attorneys, survivors, and investigative reporters gathered at the National Press Club to declare America’s family-court system a public-health crisis. Speaker after speaker said the same thing: secrecy fuels abuse. Panels exposed judicial misconduct, coerced reunification programs, unchecked power, and the catastrophic medical fallout inflicted on children. Dr. Bandy Lee called the system “a profound source of harm.” Constitutional lawyer Bruce Fein warned that secret courts threaten democracy. Survivors like Mia Ambrose and Ally Toyos described years of trauma. The message was blunt: family courts are broken and must change.

FYGA Paul Boyne

Paul Boyne, founder of The Family Court Circus and champion of the constitutional republic, is once again under judicial fire in Connecticut’s “Nutmeg” courts. His crime? Sending an email. Boyne’s polite but pointed message to Judges John Newson and Gerald Harmon sparked outrage among the black-robed elite, who responded not with reason—but with rage. “INAPPROPRIATE,” Newson thundered. In a state where “FYGA” (“F*** You Go Away”) is the unofficial judicial motto, Boyne’s message was treated not as a plea for justice, but as heresy against the sacred cult of Connecticut law.

Chris Ambrose Abused Me: Mia Ambrose, 19, details abuse of her and her brothers. Courts ignored her pleas as he sues those who told the truth.

Chris Ambrose Abused Me: Daughter Mia Speaks, Courts Corrupt, and the Kassenoff Connection

On The Unknown Podcast, Mia Ambrose shattered Christopher Ambrose’s courtroom fictions. Now 19, she calls him only “Chris,” not “dad,” and accuses him of years of sexual, emotional, and physical abuse. She detailed locked doors, barred windows, and the isolation of herself and her brothers while Connecticut courts turned a blind eye. Meanwhile, Ambrose sues psychiatrist Dr. Bandy Lee, journalist Frank Parlato, and advocate Tina Swithin for reporting what Mia insists is true. The case mirrors Allan Kassenoff’s own legal warfare, revealing a chilling pattern: abusers weaponizing family courts and lawsuits to silence their critics.

Alleged Psycho Pedo Ambrose’s defamation suit against Frank Parlato stumbles as claims of a “sent” Rule 4(d) packet lack proof. Lies catch up.

Alleged Psycho Pedo Ambrose Continues His Lies

Christopher Ambrose, the disgraced ex–TV writer branded by critics (including his own children) as an “alleged psycho pedo,” is suing investigative journalist Frank Parlato in federal court. Ambrose insists he already sent Parlato a Rule 4(d) waiver packet more than 30 days ago. Parlato checked his inboxes and archives—nothing. “Say it. Show it. Or fix it,” Parlato fired back, demanding proof of service or correction of the record. Ambrose, who has a history of lawsuits, now faces questions of perjury and honesty before the court. For now, the record shows crickets. Accuracy isn’t optional—it’s the law.

Prosecutor Jackaz’s Gag Motion Ignites Constitutional Firestorm

State Attorney John “Jack” Doyle’s August 22 motion against journalist Paul Boyne has set off a constitutional firestorm. Doyle wants to ban Boyne from possessing or sharing discovery—even redacted—with the press. Critics call it an unprecedented gag that shreds the First Amendment. Boyne, once editor of The Family Court Circus, labels Doyle “Jackaz” and accuses him of covering up judicial corruption. Even Connecticut’s own constitution promises citizens the right to “freely speak, write and publish.” Now Doyle’s bid to silence Boyne has become a national litmus test: can America tolerate unpopular voices, or will Connecticut muzzle them?

Christopher Ambrose's Fraudulent Script: fake poverty, hidden assets, custody court abuse, and a federal fraud affidavit exposed.

Christopher Ambrose’s Fraudulent Script: Family Court, Federal Court, and Fake Poverty

Christopher Ambrose plays victim while living large. The ex-TV writer seized custody of three children through family court maneuvering, then claimed financial ruin in federal court. Court filings show him hiding assets, underreporting rent, and transferring money into secret accounts while his ex-wife was left homeless. Now, Ambrose sues Dr. Bandy Lee, who scored him a chilling 32 out of 40 on the Hare Psychopathy Checklist. Ambrose calls her a liar. His affidavit tells another story. From a $2.2 million beach house to “broke” in front of a judge, Ambrose’s script is finally unraveling.

Unhinged Ambrose Floods Court with baseless lawsuits against critics. Will CT Judge Nagala finally stop suspended lawyer's courtroom circus?

Unhinged Ambrose Floods Courts with Baseless Lawsuits

Christopher Ambrose, once an NYU-trained lawyer and Hollywood writer, has morphed into Connecticut’s most notorious vexatious litigant. Suspended and disgraced, Ambrose now clogs federal courts with frivolous lawsuits targeting anyone who dares expose him. His latest filings against Dr. Bandy Lee and journalist Frank Parlato showcase a pattern of weaponizing the legal system with rambling, baseless complaints. From seizing his ex-wife’s inheritance and custody of their children to suing critics with invented claims, Ambrose thrives on abuse of process. The question: why do Connecticut’s courts still enable his psychopathic crusade?

Streeto’s Connecticut Judicial Candy Scandal

In a stunning collapse of judicial decorum, Judge Melissa Streeto of Connecticut’s Superior Court dropped more than just opinions — she delivered “bags of dicks” as gag gifts to her clerks. Literally. The Rockville-based judge, known for her rulings on habeas petitions, left x-rated candy shaped like male genitalia along with affectionate notes on subordinate desks, all while donning her latex beneath the black robe of justice. The Judicial Branch is spinning, with Chief Judge Elizabeth Bozzuto offering weak reassurances while Streeto “self-reports” to the Judicial Review Council.

The New Guard

On September 11, 2025, Connecticut’s family court insiders will gather at the elite Elm City Club to celebrate their own. The Council for Non-Adversarial Divorce will honor psychologist Sidney S. Horowitz for his decades of influence on custody litigation. Critics say this is no celebration — it’s a coronation for the next generation of judges and court vendors who profit from prolonged custody fights. Families, especially mothers, allege a system rigged for profit, with entrenched actors using “the best interest of the child” to justify private pay appointments, unchecked discretion, and court-empowered trauma. Reformers call it legalized racketeering in plain sight.

First Amendment Allergic Reaction: Judges in the Mist

In Connecticut’s twisted judicial theater, Judge Peter L. Brown nearly choked on the First Amendment—triggered by blog posts and Joette Katz’s authoritarian musings. The blog that drives judges mad, The Family Court Circus, has long skewered Katz, a former justice turned censor-in-chief. Her 2022 op-ed, “When Is Enough Enough?”, drew fire for labeling satire as criminal “threats.” Now, a courtroom transcript reveals Judge Brown’s allergic meltdown over the blog’s political speech, exposing the fragile egos and coordinated efforts of Katz, Gold, Bozzuto, and their DEI-infused judicial gang to weaponize the courts against free expression. The First Amendment’s enemies wear robes.

Ned Lamont Under Pressure: Paul Boyne exposes illegal raids, unconstitutional laws, and judicial bias in a landmark free speech battle.

NED LAMONT UNDER PRESSURE: BOYNE DROPS BOMBSHELLS ON THE UNKNOWN PODCAST

On The Unknown Podcast, Paul Boyne delivered a thunderous rebuke of Connecticut’s political and judicial elite. With hosts Richard Luthmann and Michael Volpe, Boyne detailed his civil and criminal battles against Governor Ned Lamont, exposing illegal extradition, stolen evidence, and judicial corruption. He accused state actors of violating the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, breaching the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, and suppressing constitutionally protected speech through an unconstitutional “stalking speech” law. From the Silver Platter Doctrine to Joette Katz’s behind-the-scenes influence, this episode is a masterclass in how state power can be abused to silence political dissent.

Jack Drumm's Crime School: Probationer shot up a Guilford lot after Madison PD ignored drugs and child sex at Christopher Ambrose's house.

JACK DRUMM’S CRIME SCHOOL OF CONNECTICUT

In 2023, journalist Richard Luthmann warned authorities that probationer Russell Ballard was engaging in drugs and underage sex at the Madison home of disgraced ex-DNC lawyer Christopher Ambrose. Madison Police Chief Jack Drumm was copied on the explosive letter—and did nothing. Just months later, Ballard opened fire in a Guilford parking lot. Authorities found guns, drugs, and a machine gun device. Ballard now sits in a luxury rehab center. Meanwhile, Ambrose’s alleged abuse continues unchecked. Critics say Connecticut’s family court is running a “pedophile protection program.” And Chief Drumm? He looked the other way.

Boyne Strikes Back: Accuses CT of censorship, illegal raids, ADA abuse, and jurisdiction fraud in a landmark First Amendment battle.

BOYNE STRIKES BACK: IS JACK ON CRACK OR JUST PLAIN WHACK?

Paul Boyne is no longer just defending himself—he’s going to war. After 18 months in jail for incendiary blog posts targeting Connecticut judges, the controversial former FamilyCourtCircus.com publisher appeared on The Unknown Podcast to lay out what he calls “a federal case against the State of Connecticut.” From unconstitutional speech charges to illegal property seizures, from ADA violations to extradition fraud, Boyne names names: Jack Doyle, Joette Katz, Samantha McCord, and even Gov. Ned Lamont. Boyne demands justice. “This isn’t law,” he said. “It’s control. And it’s time for them to pay.”

Ding Dong Dead Moskowitz

The death of Emily J. Moskowitz has reignited fierce debate over Connecticut’s family court system. Known both as a veteran attorney and a controversial guardian ad litem, Moskowitz was praised by the judiciary for her service and simultaneously condemned by critics as a symbol of unchecked power and judicial overreach. Central to this storm is the landmark Carrubba v. Moskowitz decision, which granted GALs absolute immunity—a legal shield that many argue enables abuse, corruption, and financial exploitation of families in crisis. As praise and scorn pour in, the battle over Moskowitz’s legacy continues to stir outrage and reflection across Connecticut.