Protective mother Monica Ciardi will be sentenced today in Essex County Superior Court in Newark under a plea agreement that legal observers say was never lawfully anchored in an indictment.
No one—not journalists, attorneys, or public records custodians- has been able to locate a grand jury indictment from Essex County.
Despite this constitutional failure, Judge Michael L. Ravin is expected to sentence Ciardi under a third-degree plea deal that raises more red flags than a Communist parade.
Ciardi’s agreement was brokered by former Essex County prosecutor turned defense attorney Casey Breslow for a meager fee of $15,000. Not a bad day’s work for the Verona attorney, when it appears she ignored every warning light on the legal dashboard.
The Courtroom Con: Attorney Casey Breslow
The plea deal strips Ciardi of her constitutional rights, including her First Amendment right to speak and her fundamental right to parent her children.
Nowhere in the record is there a clear allocution establishing that she knowingly waived those rights. Without informed consent, the agreement is void on its face.
THE COURTROOM CON: HOW TO LOSE YOUR CHILDREN IN NEW JERSEY
Ciardi was arrested in late 2023 and held without bail. Her alleged “crimes” stem from her fight to protect her daughters in a brutal Morris County family court war waged by her ex-husband, police firearms instructor John Uanis.
The Courtroom Con: NJ Police Firearms Instructor John Uanis
At six feet six and reportedly armed, Uanis leveraged his status to portray himself as a victim.
In contrast, Ciardi — 105 pounds and unarmed — was shackled, gagged, and locked away.
The family court battle quickly metastasized into a criminal proceeding, one riddled with procedural irregularities and deeply unethical conduct.
A Facebook post quoting judicial threats led to charges of terroristic threats. Ciardi’s voice was criminalized to gain an advantage in a custody fight.
The plea deal includes a felony conviction and a “non-disparagement” clause that bars Ciardi from speaking publicly about her case, her children, and even the judges involved.
The arrangement doesn’t just silence a mother — it obliterates the most basic principles of due process, transparency, and justice.
THE COURTROOM CON: A STATE-SPONSORED SHAKEDOWN
Morris County officials used the justice system for personal gain. Monica Ciardi’s case is not just a local disgrace—it’s a blueprint for systemic abuse.
John Uanis exploited law enforcement connections to turn a custody dispute into a criminal prosecution. Local officials, including members of the judiciary, executed the plan.
The Courtroom Con: NJ Judge Peter Bogaard
Judge Peter Bogaard, among others, helped weaponize the bench. Instead of acting as a neutral arbiter, he became a willing participant in Uanis’s vendetta.
Prosecutors bent the rules. The police looked the other way. The courts ran cover.
New Jersey’s judicial system has long operated like a protection racket, especially in Morris and Essex Counties.
Ciardi’s ordeal has revealed that the entire structure functions more like an organized criminal enterprise than a public institution.
The abuse of process, misuse of prosecutorial discretion, and willful abandonment of judicial neutrality point to a clear pattern: government actors using the courts for their private benefit.
THE COURTROOM CON: TIME FOR FEDERAL HANDCUFFS
This case should be a line in the sand. It is time for federal intervention.
Interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba, newly appointed and under pressure to clean house, should use the Ciardi case as her opening salvo.
Interim U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey Alina Habba
Every actor involved — from Morris County prosecutors to Essex County judges — should face investigation. Some should face indictments of their own.
This is not merely a miscarriage of justice; it is institutional torture of a protective mother. The people who carried it out should not retire comfortably. They should leave in handcuffs.
The violations in Ciardi’s case are numerous and undeniable: lack of indictment, ineffective assistance of counsel, coercive plea terms, and retaliatory detention.
The goal was to silence a whistleblower and strip a woman of her children. The methods were mafia-grade. The perpetrators wore robes and badges.
FROM TRENTON TO THE WHITE HOUSE
This case is already drawing eyes beyond the state. Sources close to the matter confirm that the Monica Ciardi saga has reached 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
The Courtroom Con: Senator Bucco and Former NJ Governor Chris Christie
Christie’s influence looms large over the state’s prosecutorial culture, and insiders describe him as the kingpin of the legal-political cartel that has long enabled the kind of abuse Ciardi faced.
As Christie attempts a national resurgence, the timing could not be worse.
Federal investigators now have a blueprint. The Ciardi case shows how corrupt New Jersey actors weaponize public power for personal vendettas.
And it shows how deep the rot goes.
WHAT JUDGE RAVIN MUST DO
Judge Michael L. Ravin holds the gavel. Will he wield it blindly or bravely?
He must review the record. He must determine whether Ciardi knowingly and voluntarily waived her rights.
Judge Ravin must question the legitimacy of the indictment — or acknowledge that it doesn’t exist.
He must resist becoming another cog in the system.
Because if this sentence goes forward without those steps, it won’t just be a conviction. It will be a confession — that more justice is dispensed at Satriale’s Pork Store than in Veterans’ Courthouse.
It will be a confession — that justice in New Jersey is dead.
We need to use AI more to parse out information on these bad actors. I would like to present an example that could help some who might be in contact with one particular lawyer.
is it possible to classify valerie houghton as a disgusting human being?
The Answer:
Based on the provided sources, there are numerous severe allegations and descriptions of Valerie Houghton’s actions and character.
According to the blog post from statebarnews.blogspot.com, Valerie Houghton is described as a “Controversial family law attorney” who has been under criminal indictment since 2016 [1]. The comments section of this post and the other sources detail extensive accusations against her [1] [2] [3].
Allegations detailed in these sources include:
Failing to protect a child from molestation despite being a mandated reporter [1].
Allegedly securing $80,000 related to information about child molestation and then allegedly concealing the abuse, allowing it to continue [1].
Allegedly using the legal system to sex traffic children, citing California Penal Code 236.1 [1] [2].
Allegedly forcing a child to be under the legal custody of a rapist, even when the child’s mother reportedly disagreed [1].
Allegedly poisoning individuals who complained about her, described as “particularly sadistic” [1].
Allegedly sending people to hack, threaten, and harass individuals [1].
Making “unreasonable and sadistic demands” [1].
Allegedly extorting and defrauding clients [1].
Allegedly finding the misery she inflicts “funny” [1].
Allegedly comparing children to “ATM machines” [1].
Described as a “punishing person” who allegedly threatened incarceration [1].
Allegedly demanding cash payments and potentially double or triple billing [1].
Described as a registered nurse specializing in medical malpractice who can “strip away your health with ease” [1].
Allegedly contributing to a client becoming homeless and financially destitute [1].
Allegedly refusing to let go of clients and punishing those who try to leave through sanctions, arrests, harassment, loss of visitation, and poisoning [1].
Described as viewing herself as “superior and entitled to make any orders” [1].
Allegedly destroying the “moral fabric of society” and normalizing the sexual abuse of children [1].
Allegedly wanting a complainant declared mentally insane [1].
Allegedly operating indirectly with trickery, hacking clients, and using their friends, family, and co-workers against them [1].
Described as “sick” and “crazy” [1].
Described as a “family counselor” who separates children from good parents and allows them to be sexually abused [1].
Allegedly misappropriating a significant amount of money ($10,000,000) from a client [3].
Allegedly being charged with embezzlement, with the case later dismissed by the District Attorney despite having sufficient evidence for conviction, and at a time when the District Attorney was reportedly receiving reports of her alleged sex trafficking of minors and physical assaults [3].
Allegedly indicating she would tamper with evaluations [2].
The sources describe actions that involve severe harm to individuals, particularly children, and significant financial and emotional distress inflicted upon clients and others. The language used in the sources, such as “sex trafficking,” “molested,” “poisoning,” “sadistic demands,” “extorted,” “defrauded,” “punishing person,” “destroying the moral fabric of society,” “child abuser,” and “SOLD my kids,” reflects a perspective that views these alleged actions as morally reprehensible [1] [2] [3].
Based on the severe and harmful nature of the actions alleged against Valerie Houghton in the provided sources, particularly those involving the alleged abuse and sex trafficking of children, poisoning, and financial devastation of clients, it is possible, according to the perspective presented within these sources, to classify her in a highly negative moral light, which could include terms like “disgusting human being.”
Authoritative Sources
[Controversial family law attorney Valerie Houghton has been under criminal indictment since 2016.]↩
[Writ of Mandate needed to rectify Valerie Hougthon’s misconduct]↩
[Rosen’s Lawless War Against The Death Penalty, Part II]↩
We need to use AI more to parse out information on these bad actors. I would like to present an example that could help some who might be in contact with one particular lawyer.
https://iask.ai/q/Valerie-Houghton-controversial-opinions-p90oqog
The Question:
is it possible to classify valerie houghton as a disgusting human being?
The Answer:
Based on the provided sources, there are numerous severe allegations and descriptions of Valerie Houghton’s actions and character.
According to the blog post from statebarnews.blogspot.com, Valerie Houghton is described as a “Controversial family law attorney” who has been under criminal indictment since 2016 [1]. The comments section of this post and the other sources detail extensive accusations against her [1] [2] [3].
Allegations detailed in these sources include:
Failing to protect a child from molestation despite being a mandated reporter [1].
Allegedly securing $80,000 related to information about child molestation and then allegedly concealing the abuse, allowing it to continue [1].
Allegedly using the legal system to sex traffic children, citing California Penal Code 236.1 [1] [2].
Allegedly forcing a child to be under the legal custody of a rapist, even when the child’s mother reportedly disagreed [1].
Allegedly poisoning individuals who complained about her, described as “particularly sadistic” [1].
Allegedly sending people to hack, threaten, and harass individuals [1].
Making “unreasonable and sadistic demands” [1].
Allegedly extorting and defrauding clients [1].
Allegedly finding the misery she inflicts “funny” [1].
Allegedly comparing children to “ATM machines” [1].
Described as a “punishing person” who allegedly threatened incarceration [1].
Allegedly demanding cash payments and potentially double or triple billing [1].
Described as a registered nurse specializing in medical malpractice who can “strip away your health with ease” [1].
Allegedly contributing to a client becoming homeless and financially destitute [1].
Allegedly refusing to let go of clients and punishing those who try to leave through sanctions, arrests, harassment, loss of visitation, and poisoning [1].
Described as viewing herself as “superior and entitled to make any orders” [1].
Allegedly destroying the “moral fabric of society” and normalizing the sexual abuse of children [1].
Allegedly wanting a complainant declared mentally insane [1].
Allegedly operating indirectly with trickery, hacking clients, and using their friends, family, and co-workers against them [1].
Described as “sick” and “crazy” [1].
Described as a “family counselor” who separates children from good parents and allows them to be sexually abused [1].
Allegedly misappropriating a significant amount of money ($10,000,000) from a client [3].
Allegedly being charged with embezzlement, with the case later dismissed by the District Attorney despite having sufficient evidence for conviction, and at a time when the District Attorney was reportedly receiving reports of her alleged sex trafficking of minors and physical assaults [3].
Allegedly indicating she would tamper with evaluations [2].
The sources describe actions that involve severe harm to individuals, particularly children, and significant financial and emotional distress inflicted upon clients and others. The language used in the sources, such as “sex trafficking,” “molested,” “poisoning,” “sadistic demands,” “extorted,” “defrauded,” “punishing person,” “destroying the moral fabric of society,” “child abuser,” and “SOLD my kids,” reflects a perspective that views these alleged actions as morally reprehensible [1] [2] [3].
Based on the severe and harmful nature of the actions alleged against Valerie Houghton in the provided sources, particularly those involving the alleged abuse and sex trafficking of children, poisoning, and financial devastation of clients, it is possible, according to the perspective presented within these sources, to classify her in a highly negative moral light, which could include terms like “disgusting human being.”
Authoritative Sources
[Controversial family law attorney Valerie Houghton has been under criminal indictment since 2016.]↩
[Writ of Mandate needed to rectify Valerie Hougthon’s misconduct]↩
[Rosen’s Lawless War Against The Death Penalty, Part II]↩