Skip to content

Timely Fashion

NOTEThis piece is written in the “classical style” of The Blog and is intended to offend. Reader discretion is advised.

Grape Ape

By Grape Ape

Scrupulous exactitude of Connecticut criminal justice falls to the weighty question of what is ‘timely fashion’? Broken down to particulars, what is ‘timely’ and what is ‘fashion’? Or perhaps judicial pondering of the deep philosophical temporal question of time is just another form of trickery and deceit in the constitutional cesspool of Judge Peter Brown’s court?

Timely Fashion: Judge Peter Brown stalls justice in Connecticut, turning free speech into “stalking” while debating legal meanings.

Judge Brown attacks protected political expression for private cause in the defeat of the essence of self-government, chilling expression of all who may exercise a free press in patriotic effort to bring about a more perfect Union. Charges before his bench lack particular elements of the physical crime of ‘stalking’, where domestic terrorist SA Jack Doyle claims disliked political expression is criminal conduct, punishing protected speech on complaint of the interested but offended voluntary reader of political essays. Brown plays along, declining to specify the exact prose of the criminal ‘stalking’, but details are not the big dumb ape’s strong suit, nor is scrupulous exactitude, nor is being a judge. Brown remains faithful and obedient to his private masters, denying four demands to cite particulars of the charged speech. At the same time, the latest betrayal of Brown’s allegiance to the dark side is a necessity to argue the meaning of ‘timely fashion’. A judge entrusted by ‘we the people’ to ensure the proper administration of justice brings proceedings to a halt, demanding briefs and argument on the precise meaning of ‘timely’ and ‘fashion’. Oi vey, the rabbinical court stops at nothing to pummel the rights of the goy!

Timely Fashion: Judge Peter Brown stalls justice in Connecticut, turning free speech into “stalking” while debating legal meanings.

On behalf of the nutmeg people, an errant prosecutorial authority, the bald-headed clown Jack Doyle and his refrigerator-sized ignorant assistant, Gregory Borrelli, plead that due process rights enshrined in state and federal constitutions magically evaporate when deprivations created and ignored by the court are not raised in a ‘timely fashion’. The lawless magic sauce creates the alien concept of expiring rights, working to obscure the court’s error of bringing charges and arraignments in the wrong districts, while following a private script to suspend due process, suspend notice and cause of accusations, and suspend speedy trials. A brilliant play by judge and prosecutor to delay the impending collapse of a fabricated case, no question for a jury, nothing but interstate harassment brought on by a distraught Joette Katz, wielding ADL’s wrath, enacted through a corrupted state judiciary. The State’s position on the realization of Jack Doyle’s error is vocalized by ASA Borrelli, stating: ‘we are where we are’, as if Judge Calistro’s error of October ‘23 is somehow cured by time of being ignored by three judges, two prosecutors, and eight public defenders over the last two years. The ape on the bench issues orders:

The issue becomes what is meant by “timely fashion.”
The court directs the parties to brief this issue and to file simultaneous briefs with the court not later than September 16, 2025. The court will hear further argument on the venue issue on the next court date of September 22, 2025. The court reserves ruling on the motion for joinder until the court resolves the venue issue raised by the defendant.

Jack Doyle is paid $215k/yr for professional services. Still, he brings charges to the wrong court, in violation of the State Constitution’s Article I, Section 8, which guarantees a speedy trial in the district where the crime is committed. Still, Judge Brown is not fast nor the proper judicial district, requiring swift remedy to the deprivation, commanded by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Enforcement Act of 1871 (Ku Klux Klan Act). Still, the ape defers to contemplating ‘timely fashion’ in defeat of the rule of law, as apes lack scrupulous exactitude when picking between bananas and watermelons. Just another charade, creating an illusion of law to promote a private agenda, punishing disliked political expression by the judge club … a truly alien ideology. First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth are big numbers, well above an ape’s intellect to comprehend. The big brown ape flails desperately, grasping to salvage the fatally flawed case by combining three distinct sets of charges, on three different ‘victims’, in three distinct districts, brought under three separate arrest warrants, with no particulars, into one trial before a downtown jury, which he can manipulate from his crooked bench, simply to appease his masters, in promise of more bananas … a trained puppet of his masters, voiding rule of law, a betrayal of oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, a domestic enemy of ‘we the people’, a true domestic terrorist, an ape.

Timely Fashion: Judge Peter Brown stalls justice in Connecticut, turning free speech into “stalking” while debating legal meanings.

Judge Brown conspires with SA Jack Doyle in deprivation of rights, ignoring state agents’ violation of Virginia law, Jack’s disdain for laws of the several states, due process, the power and jurisdiction of their courts, even Judge Calistro acted in conspiracy with SA Doyle to deny redress of aggrieved person by trashing properly filed motion by the target of Joette’s wrath. No redress allowed!!! There is nowhere for these unscrupulous state actors to hide; every move made by Judge Brown is another fatal flaw, every move by SA Doyle digs a deeper hole, providing no escape. Disbarment and debenching are remedies left to ‘we the people’, where the government of the people, for the people, and by the people fails its sworn duty, while the judge club and their protected pets remain beyond reach, untouchable, inciting imminent lawless action of the sovereign, the only remedy left to save the people’s Constitution from the planet of apes. Connecticut has a truly independent judiciary, being completely independent of the law.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *