DC Family Court Hands Kids to a Man Who Thinks Bestiality Laws Don’t Apply to Robot Dogs—Despite Medical Evidence of Abuse and Brain Trauma

By Richard Luthmann
Robot Dog Daddy: Deep State DHS—The Man Behind the Machine
Joseph A. Scallan III isn’t just any divorced dad in Family Court. He’s a long-serving operative of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. But this isn’t about immigration policy or border control.

It’s about a man allegedly sending a video to colleagues of a robotic dog engaging in simulated sexual acts—and then insisting that sex with such machines isn’t bestiality.
According to a source familiar with the incident, Scallan, who has served at DHS since the Obama Administration, worked as a liaison between Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on robotic canine systems.
“He actually distributed a graphic satire video discussing a robot dog being sexually used,” the source said. “He saw nothing wrong with it.”
Despite this disturbing context, Scallan now enjoys a deeply reduced child support obligation—slashed from $3,000 per month to just $75—and the backing of rookie court appointees from the global law firm Jones Day, serving pro bono as guardians ad litem.
Scallan also cut off his own kids’ health insurance.
The Jones Day attorneys’ legal inexperience may be enabling Scallan’s broader manipulation of the system.
The Science of Trauma—and the D.C. Court’s Blind Eye
Renowned neurologist Dr. S. Gregory Hipskind, MD, PhD, a nationally recognized expert in SPECT imaging and a member of the White House Brain Health in America Initiative Committee, has provided clear and damning evidence: Scallan’s children suffer from traumatic brain injury.

Hipskind’s work, done in conjunction with the Amen Clinics, involves advanced SPECT scans showing significant damage linked to environmental and emotional trauma.
“SPECT imaging allows us to observe brain function in real-time,” said Dr. Hipskind. “We’ve seen these children’s scans. Their brains show the markers of chronic abuse and toxic stress.”
Dr. Hipskind has testified in high-stakes criminal and civil cases. He’s interpreted more than 4,000 scans.
His findings are clear: the children’s brain injuries likely stem from long-term exposure to a harmful environment, one described as neurologically comparable to carbon monoxide poisoning.

Yet the DC Family Court appears determined to ignore that science.
Judges, guardians, and therapists are “blindly executing a pre-scripted plan,” said children’s advocate Jill Jones Soderman, Director of the Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts (fcvfc.org), a non-profit Family Court watchdog organization.
“They’re putting traumatized children back into a toxic household as if nothing happened,” Soderman said.
Robot Dog Daddy: The Reunification Farce—Victim Blaming in Court
Despite clear medical records and SPECT imaging showing trauma, the court has ordered “reunification” therapy between Scallan and the children—especially his son Andrew.
According to transcripts, Scallan canceled a dinner date with Andrew. Andrew cried and begged to see his father. The father’s excuse? “No Chipotle is open.”

Instead of comfort, Scallan mocked his son, saying, “What a bad example big brother is. He’s a wimp… crying because of a cancelled dinner.”
Therapist Michelle Dodge, recently appointed by the court, acknowledged that the children may not want to engage in therapy with their father. But she and her counterparts, the GALs from Jones Day, are proceeding anyway, believing it’s “what the court expects.”

Meanwhile, records show Scallan often refuses visits. When he does engage, he complains that the children are alienated.
But the reality is darker: he skips his obligations, and when his son begs for contact, Scallan belittles him.
Robot Dog Daddy: Mechanical Sex, Alcohol, and Government Secrets—But He Gets Custody?
Scallan’s government ties seem to insulate him. He’s worked at Schafer Corp., participated in DHS-sponsored biometric projects, and been listed on federal facial and iris recognition research.
Yet this man—with a documented problem with alcohol and a warped sense of sexual ethics—is being treated as a credible father figure.

“He believes sex with robotic animals isn’t bestiality,” said one source. “He thought it was funny. [Scallan] distributed that video in a professional setting while developing robot dogs for the government.”
The same man, according to family court records, neglected his children emotionally, verbally abused them, and subjected them to inappropriate sexual displays with a family pet.
Yet Jones Day’s court-appointed rookies are ignoring medical records, minimizing trauma, and treating Scallan as the victim.
“It’s a conveyor belt to abuse,” said Soderman. “And the children are the ones paying the price.”
Robot Dog Daddy: The Real Danger—Sending Kids Back into the Fire
Dr. Hipskind compared the situation to removing children from a house filled with carbon monoxide, diagnosing neurological damage, then putting them right back in.
“You wouldn’t re-expose them to that environment. But that’s exactly what this court is doing,” he said.
The children display symptoms consistent with hypercapnia—oxygen deprivation from psychological terror. Hospital records document episodes of psychogenic seizures, involuntary urination, and emotional shutdowns.
Yet none of this has swayed the court.
Instead, the court is threatening the mother, Victoria Scallan, with contempt.
Her crime? Trying to protect her children.
“The so-called professionals refuse to review the evidence,” said Soderman. “They don’t want hospital records. They want obedience.”
The conclusion? In Washington, D.C., a DHS official who believes robot-dog sex isn’t bestiality, who mocks his son for crying, and who triggered proven traumatic brain injuries in his children, is being handed his kids on a silver platter—while the protective parent is treated like a criminal.
What if there was a real dog? How could the hypothetical dog provide any consent? Would it be considered rape?
These are the same considerations that need to be made when a therapist and/ or attorney introduces a child to a sexual experience.
Valerie Houghton simply says, “My child, my rules.” She has no consideration for the needs or feelings of children. Ms. Houghton forces herself (by proxy) onto the children. Remember, she doesn’t say, “My client, their rules.” It is just as much about forcing the child to experience her sexual needs as it is about the needs of the people doing the raping.
Speaking of sex with dogs, you really need to see this video that shows Valerie Houghton talking about molesting goats [kids]. She says that it is not reportable.
She starts out by talking about a 9 year old child asking about prostitutes.
You need to see it to believe it.
https://rumble.com/v2ceev2-valerie-houghton-joke-that-kids-getting-molested-is-not-reportable.html
“Why me, why now, why is this happening?”
That is what Valerie Houghton said before speaking about children and prostitution.
You won’t know what hit you. Ms. Houghton will mock you as your kids are molested.
And all the normal rules and laws of a civil society will go out the window. She works with all the attorneys and judges involved to ensure that the abuse continues. What you see on T.V. or hear about on the news just won’t match your new reality. Any abuse will simply be “not reportable”.
This is an important read.
Veterinary Forensic Pathology of Animal Sexual Abuse (A. W. Stern and M. Smith-Blackmore 2016)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0300985816643574
These researchers go into great depth on how to investigate the sexual abuse of animals. Many of the parameters that they cite are already being used with humans, such as screening for sexually transmitted diseases. The one aspect that really differentiates human sexual abuse and animal sexual abuse is the use of classifications. If you look at table 1, you can see many of them.
Zoophile by proxy is defined as an individual forced into a sex act with an animal by a human partner. Why do we not have these kinds of classifications for sick attorneys who force children to be sexually abused? If a person does this to an animal, they are automatically classified as a “zoophile by proxy”. Why are people like Valerie Houghton not classified as a “pedophile by proxy”?
You can already see how she talks to young boys about porn and posts incessantly about sex acts with kids on her social media. Why does the public need to stop at calling her a sex trafficker?
“He actually distributed a graphic satire video discussing a robot dog being sexually used,” the source said. “He saw nothing wrong with it.”
Of course he saw nothing wrong with it. Valerie Houghton will also tell you that there is nothing wrong with raping children.
She says:
“It’s not rape if they want it.”
“She’ll [my youngest daughter] will have fun!”
“Pedophilia is not a crime.”
“Pedophilia is part of gender identity.”
The only thing wrong with pedophilia is the “stigma”.
Why does anyone say these kinds of things? These are deranged people who are justifying and normalizing their sexual obsessions.
Valerie Houghton asks an interesting question of her new website, http://www.famdynamics.com The answer that she gives to her own question is quite telling. See it below.
Have you ever wondered how you’ve gotten to where you are?
Whether it’s external – a career you don’t recognize, a relationship you don’t enjoy, a friend group that feels toxic – or internal – you are quick to anger, inexplicably tired all the time, unmotivated – you feel like at some point you reached a fork in the road and took the wrong turn. And now you don’t know how to turn it around.
This is really an insight into working with Valerie Houghton. She is going to gather as much information about your life as she can. This isn’t to improve your life. There won’t be any actual “therapy”. Valerie works to ruin your life by being that “external” force that will destroy your career and make relationships “unenjoyable” and “toxic”.
Believe her when she says that you “took the wrong turn” and that you won’t “know how to turn it around”. You have never met anyone like her before, and won’t know what to do. If I knew, I would have posted it. It will be impossible to rid her from your life.
I urge everyone to take a look at a lawsuit that I filed against Judge James Towery. If you scroll down to EXHIBIT A, you will see one of Valerie Houghton’s invoices.
https://www.calameo.com/read/006718309b846b5200bda
She could have put anything on her invoice: flowers, helping hands, a family, a house, a heart …….
Does anyone think that it is a coincidence that Valerie Houghton puts a picture of a naked boy statue on her invoices?
I certainly don’t. That is what she is into. It is what she sells.
“The so-called professionals refuse to review the evidence,” said Soderman. “They don’t want hospital records. They want obedience.”
Ms. Soderman is correct about wanting obedience. But I have to disagree about refusing to review evidence. Many of these “professionals” know about children being raped. They just preclude the evidence so that the abuse continues. For instance, I can’t get a screening for my sexually abused kids. Conducting a screening is the bare minimum when a child has reported that he has been raped since the age of 13 and other children are showing signs for the same abuse.
Valerie Houghton (my former attorney) wants the sexual abuse to continue, so she has influenced the county to deny my kids basic services. Ms. Houghton also had me hacked, stalked and assaulted when I complained about her conduct.
It is often difficult to understand these professionals. Most people who behave like Ms. Houghton are disciplined by law enforcement or not allowed to continue in their profession. Sadly, people who make a living in Family Court just don’t suffer these types of consequences. Our legal system supports sadists and sociopaths.
If you really want to understand who Valerie Houghton is, read articles on John Wayne Gacy. He is the perfect person to use for a comparison.
Both Houghton and Gacy:
1. Enjoyed sexually abusing young boys, whether directly or by proxy.
2. Derive pleasure from physical torture and killing others.
3. Had strong political ties. Read about them here: https://www.oxygen.com/martinis-murder/serial-killers-political-party-voting-records
4. They were/ are entrepreneurs that used their businesses to prey on children.
If you get off from having sex with a robot dog, it means that you get off on fucking animals. I don’t understand how it can be seen another way when human blow-up dolls exist.
I would use the same logic for lawyers and therapist that sex traffic children. They are sick pedophiles.
Just look at people who pimp out adult women. Said pimps have sex with their “employees”. The women also view their relationship with the pimps as sexual in nature. It’s simple Pavlovian math.
So I don’t think that it’s an accident when Valerie Houghton both sex traffics younger children and expresses so many positive views on pedophilia. Please read some of her own words for yourself.
https://pdfhost.io/v/Su6QiWEU8_Valerie_Houghton_posts__1_-compressed
This is an extremely sick and dangerous individual. Ms. Houghton will stop at nothing to satisfy her sexual needs with other people’s children.
Watch out. Valerie Houghton now works in all 50 states.
http://www.famdynamics.com
https://www.valeriehoughtonmft.com/
Valerie Houghton is simply a degenerate animal. If she demands that your children be raped, Ms. Houghton simply doesn’t take “no” for answer.
This is someone that is highly brazen with child molestation and violence. Ms. Houghton doesn’t belong in therapy sessions with children. Prison is the place for her.
Although Rape by Proxy laws don’t exist in every jurisdiction, it shouldn’t minimize their importance.
https://mginjuryfirm.com/understanding-what-is-rape-by-proxy-unmasking-the-complex-issue/
Theses types of laws can be highly effective at protecting children. For instance, the state of Utah convicted Warren Jeffs of the sexual abuse of a 14 year old using this law.
“This trial has not been about religion or vendetta. It was simply about child abuse and preventing abuse,” the victim, now 21, said in prepared remarks after the verdict.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna20974526
Warren Jeffs was no less of a shit-human-being than is Valerie Houghton. They both committed this type of rape on a large scale. While Ms. Houghton might claim that she is innocent because she was not physically involved, these rape by proxy laws would hold her accountable for crimes.
Hopefully, more states will adopt these rape laws.
Here are two new articles that were published yesterday on a pediatrician losing their medical license.
https://www.newsminimalist.com/articles/california-revokes-doctors-license-for-child-sex-abuse-dc10581a
https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/05/21/former-santa-clara-county-child-welfare-physician-accused-of-sexually-abusing-kids-loses-medical-license/
Dr. Patrick Clyne was long accused but never criminally charged with sexually abusing youth under his care.
Dr. Patrick Clyne used to be the Chief Pediatrician for Santa Clara County. He used to be the one to examine molested kids for Santa Clara County and testify for the prosecution in trials related to the sexual abuse of children. Over the decades, Dr. Clyne has been accused of molesting at least 12 kids that he fostered in his San Jose, CA home. He has also been accused of molesting children that were his patients.
In 2011, District Attorney Jeff Rosen put him on the Brady list. This was the statement that his office released:
[a committee of prosecutors] “feels that there is substantial evidence that Dr. Clyne committed multiple crimes involving moral turpitude, specifically sexual assault.”
https://www.mercurynews.com/2011/04/23/new-details-emerge-about-fired-santa-clara-county-pediatrician-accused-of-sexual-molestation/
With the large number of kids accusing this doctor and the drastic step that put Dr. Clyne on the Brady list, why didn’t District Attorney Rosen prosecute him? Didn’t he care that Dr. Clyne subsequently went on to molest more children in his private practice located in Watsonville?
Please watch this video:
https://youtu.be/7sy-bBU4KQs?t=893
In this video, you can see one of the many times that I ask Jeff Rosen to provide a referral for my kids to the Child Advocacy Center. He is seated 2nd from left.
This is just terrible. The District Attorney should have sent a strong message to people who sexually abuse children. Now child molesters with political connections know that the worst thing that will happen to them in the justice system is that they will be placed on the Brady List.
I don’t know if this is a coincidence, but Valerie Houghton and Dr. Patrick Clyne used to work less than 4 blocks from each other.
https://www.healthgrades.com/providers/valerie-houghton-xylh89q
https://www.yelp.com/biz/patrick-clyne-md-san-jose
https://www.mapquest.com/us/california/patrick-clyne-md-345697864
Does anyone know if they collaborated?
There is no way that Dr. Clyne could have gotten off the hook on his own. He would have needed a fixer. It would not be out of left field if Valerie Houghton was involved. Dr. Clyne would have likely first contacted a medical malpractice attorney. He could have contacted James Towery, who then (2011) was leader in the field.
https://lawyers.justia.com/lawyer/james-earl-towery-51735
Towery is the judge that is sex trafficking my kids in Family Court. During the time that he presided over my case, Valerie Houghton kept asking me if I looked at her website. When I did, I saw that Judge Towery was listed as a personal reference. Ms. Houghton used to work at his law firm.
I included screenshots from her website in the complaint that I filed in the Northern District of California. You can see them here:
https://www.calameo.com/read/006718309538d136d3b0c
Judge Towery also represented Jeff Rosen pro bono when Rosen first ran for District Attorney. I can tell you from experience that he has a lot of sway with him. You can see a reply that I got on my complaint on his Robing Room page.
“The district attorney would sooner investigate you than do anything to protect a child against a judge’s wishes. They cower in fear to these judges who control their livelihood. The common person means nothing to them.”
http://www.therobingroom.com/texas/Judge.aspx?id=15387
Maybe Towery and Houghton also influenced District Attorney Rosen to take it easy on Dr. Clyne. Rosen didn’t even bother to complain to the Medical Board. He left him free to open a private practice and abuse even more children.